1 hour ago, shlo said:

I haven't had any problems at all.

Lucky I guess. Some of us have. It's happening for me on multiple devices

6 minutes ago, 315Eagles said:

What people dont understand is that Hurts is our QB. If he makes a bad play or costly mistake to lose a game, of course the fanbase is going to be mad and complain about it.

They seem to think that if Josh Alken was our QB and did that or Herbert was our QB and did that or Stafford was our QB and did that..........that this fanbase would give those guys a free pass and not Hurts.

Some in this blog spend way too much time thinking about other teams QBs.

I would’ve been just as upset whether it was hurts, foles, McNabb, Allen, Lamar, Mahomes. Because it’s a play that was a costly mistake. Now granted they played well the rest of the game I’d still give them props for playing as well as they did, but that play was costly. You can’t just gloss it over because they played great the rest of the game.

Just like Josh Allen last night. I love Josh Allen. But 3 of those 4 turnovers are just inexcusable. The only one I can excuse would be the 3rd and 11 from the 36bwhere they decided to take a deep shot. That I didn’t mind the play call because if it’s incomplete, you’re punting it. If he catches it, you won the game. If it’s intercepted, it’s basically like a punt which you were going to do on fourth down anyways. that was a phenomenal play by mcmillain to get it from cooks.

The one that’s really bad what’s the fumble right before the half. He cannot fumble that ball. Especially knowing there’s only 16 seconds left. It is of the upmost importance to not turn the ball over there. Furthermore the other issue is the Buffalo Bills doing running a play unless it was just a deep shot. had no timeouts and 16 seconds at the 30 yard line. Which means you had to go about 30 yards just to attempt a field goal with a kicker who’s older and inconsistent from 55+. So really you needed about 35-38 yards. So had to use sidelines or just take deep shots and hope for a PI. Broncos basically played the sideline so it had to be middle of the field. As soon as that happens Allen should’ve just slid and clock runs out or thrown it away then kneeled on 2nd down.

4 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

I will say my take that Sirianni and Daboll can’t coexist is softening a bit because I didn’t realize they had worked together previously.

Yep same. And might be for the best - Sirianni was WR coach when Daboll was OC. There’s already a deferred dynamic between them when it comes to running an offense. Different times I get it, but if folks want to get Sirianni’s grubby hands off the offense, Daboll seems like a good choice.

I think Allen would be undeniable here with our personnel. Generally I’ve thought that he will only ever win a SB if he can just steamroll everybody. Winning close playoff games, etc. I don’t see it. Putting up 35+ a game with AJB/Smith/Barkley/a healthier version of this OL/not Patullo as the OC? Sure I see it.

I just get annoyed by the narrative that Josh Allen is this era defining talent who’s only not winning SBs because of Mahomes. It’s just not true.

On 1/17/2026 at 9:38 AM, SkippyX said:

Stafford's specialty this year is putting up something like 5 for 17 in the middle of games as the other team boat races him.

Absolutely false statement.

Matt Stafford's completion percentage is pretty even each quarter, and is highest in the 3rd quarter.

Meanwhile, the guy you are trying to pump up, Hurts, while saying inaccurate things about Stafford, has a major completion percentage drop off in the 3rd and 4th quarter.

Also, Rams points per quarter

1 - 6.7

2 - 8.6

3 - 7.1

4 - 8.0

Then you have Eagles points per quarter

1 - 6.1

2 - 6.4

3 - 4.6

4 - 5.1 ( 30th in the NFL )

Before making absurd statements to pump up Hurts, make sure your facts are correct so someone doesn't provide facts that make you look foolish, and your idol look worse.

1 hour ago, T-1000 said:

That loss to 49'ers wasn't as bad as Eagles fan thought. Nope, after last night it's about a million times worse. I REALLY hope the Eagles organization are aware of just how bad and utterly pathetic that was.

Yup

Whether Sirianni and the OC can coexist is the last thing on my mind. I want the best offensive mind. That's all I care about. It's hard to judge Daboll given the circumstances he's coached in. And as we've learned in the past with Steichen and Reich, the success an OC's offense has in previous stops is not necessarily an indicator on how bright they are. Daboll's offenses have been up and down, so it's hard to judge him.

Patriots have the weakest path in history

https://x.com/RapSheet/status/2012956006846796130?s=20

45 minutes ago, Eriv20 said:

Yeah one is a journeyman backup and the other is an mvp. I see the correlation

But that’s the point. You can have similar molds with varying degrees of success. They are very similar. And Wentz was an MVP favorite once too.

11 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

Still not used to seeing that much green distributed around the field on an eagles passing chart.

I look at this play and say it should have been reviewed. It’s way too pivotal of a play at too big of a moment to not have it at least reviewed. But whatever they called on the field was going to stand. Because if you look at it from one angle, it could be one thing and you could go with that ruling. But if you look at it from this angle, it looks like it should be an interception.

Ultimately there wasn’t gonna be conclusive evidence to overturn what they called on the field. However, I do think you should’ve reviewed it considering the fact what is that stake

imo McDermott crying about it being a catch is laughable. The bigger issues for me coming out of this game if I’m Buffalo and their front office, we need better wide receivers to make it easier on the offense, can’t turn the ball over 5 times and expect to win a football game and our defense consistently when having a chance to close out a game or in our biggest games, comes up small. it feels like every year the bills when they lose shift to some sort of blame besides what the players and coaches did. A couple years ago oh, we didn’t get to touch the ball in overtime. Last year oh he definitely got that first down on that sneak. This year that play. At some point in time if you coach better and your players played better you’re not in the position to rely on reviews, rules and officials

3 hours ago, Cliftoma said:

That guy is good. Blazing fast get off.

Yup I watched him and that Texas Tech Defense destroy BYU twice.

21 minutes ago, Sack that QB said:

Whether Sirianni and the OC can coexist is the last thing on my mind. I want the best offensive mind. That's all I care about. It's hard to judge Daboll given the circumstances he's coached in. And as we've learned in the past with Steichen and Reich, the success an OC's offense has in previous stops is not necessarily an indicator on how bright they are. Daboll's offenses have been up and down, so it's hard to judge him.

To be fair to Sirriani there's no history of him not being able to coexist with coaches. That's all projection from this board

Daboll is not my first choice, BUT he has experience with the spread, play-calling and working with different styles of QBs. We could do much, much worse.

2 minutes ago, Eriv20 said:

I’d say mahomes and Stafford are pretty good at that. Allen when he has some help.

1 minute ago, jojodancer said:

Broncos will eek this out. Have done so all year.

36 minutes ago, Saltpeter said:

I think Allen would be undeniable here with our personnel. Generally I’ve thought that he will only ever win a SB if he can just steamroll everybody. Winning close playoff games, etc. I don’t see it. Putting up 35+ a game with AJB/Smith/Barkley/a healthier version of this OL/not Patullo as the OC? Sure I see it.

I just get annoyed by the narrative that Josh Allen is this era defining talent who’s only not winning SBs because of Mahomes. It’s just not true.

Allen would be sick at running 4 hitches

10 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

I look at this play and say it should have been reviewed. It’s way too pivotal of a play at too big of a moment to not have it at least reviewed. But whatever they called on the field was going to stand. Because if you look at it from one angle, it could be one thing and you could go with that ruling. But if you look at it from this angle, it looks like it should be an interception.

Ultimately there wasn’t gonna be conclusive evidence to overturn what they called on the field. However, I do think you should’ve reviewed it considering the fact what is that stake

imo McDermott crying about it being a catch is laughable. The bigger issues for me coming out of this game if I’m Buffalo and their front office, we need better wide receivers to make it easier on the offense, can’t turn the ball over 5 times and expect to win a football game and our defense consistently when having a chance to close out a game or in our biggest games, comes up small. it feels like every year the bills when they lose shift to some sort of blame besides what the players and coaches did. A couple years ago oh, we didn’t get to touch the ball in overtime. Last year oh he definitely got that first down on that sneak. This year that play. At some point in time if you coach better and your players played better you’re not in the position to rely on reviews, rules and officials

IMO, the spirit and flow of the play are both "INT" and the rule book interpretation of the play is impossible to determine. Rule book is that the play dies the second his body hits the ground and whomever has possession keeps the football. It's impossible to know who had more possession of the football when they first met the ground. It was all one smooth motion that resulted in the defender ending up with the ball...not the defender yanking it out on the ground. That's why I think the refs made the best possible call on the field and, had it gone to replay, you have to stick with the call on the field.

8 minutes ago, pgcd3 said:

To be fair to Sirriani there's no history of him not being able to coexist with coaches. That's all projection from this board

Sirriani is tough to evaluate as a CEO head coach. On the surface, he's immature and not exactly an even keeled steady hand. Looking beyond that...this team has done pretty well managing personalities.

McDermott became a whiny little B the minute he got a little cachet in the league. F that guy, I’m glad he’s upset

3 minutes ago, eagle45 said:

IMO, the spirit and flow of the play are both "INT" and the rule book interpretation of the play is impossible to determine. Rule book is that the play dies the second his body hits the ground and whomever has possession keeps the football. It's impossible to know who had more possession of the football when they first met the ground. It was all one smooth motion that resulted in the defender ending up with the ball...not the defender yanking it out on the ground. That's why I think the refs made the best possible call on the field and, had it gone to replay, you have to stick with the call on the field.

Yup. It’s why I hate fans complaining about it and McDermott crying about it. There was no conclusive evidence that they were going to be able to overturn it either way. Should they’ve looked at the replay? Yeah, but I don’t think it makes any difference on the outcome of what the call would’ve been. Whatever the officials called it was what it was going to be after review.

But then again, I feel like this is a deflection for Sean McDermott for the fact that his team did things that they normally do in playoff losses. And he’s trying to deflect and shift blame from things he could control to things he can’t

Ah yes the Allen excuses are out in full force, nothing about the two reckless fumbles that lost the game.

See the agenda?

13 minutes ago, eagle45 said:

IMO, the spirit and flow of the play are both "INT" and the rule book interpretation of the play is impossible to determine. Rule book is that the play dies the second his body hits the ground and whomever has possession keeps the football. It's impossible to know who had more possession of the football when they first met the ground. It was all one smooth motion that resulted in the defender ending up with the ball...not the defender yanking it out on the ground. That's why I think the refs made the best possible call on the field and, had it gone to replay, you have to stick with the call on the field.

The problem is that they have ruled otherwise in other situations.

Stafford:

Kyler Murray (finished 1-5 and only beat Dak in those 6)

44 year old Brady (because Todd Bowels called a stupid blitz with 15 seconds left)

Jimmy G (because Jaquiski dropped the ball)

Burrow with no OL

Darnold who had a 55 rating the week before vs Detroit for the bye.

Bryce Young on an 8-9 team

I will take Josh Allen, thank you

7 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Yup. It’s why I hate fans complaining about it and McDermott crying about it. There was no conclusive evidence that they were going to be able to overturn it either way. Should they’ve looked at the replay? Yeah, but I don’t think it makes any difference on the outcome of what the call would’ve been. Whatever the officials called it was what it was going to be after review.

But then again, I feel like this is a deflection for Sean McDermott for the fact that his team did things that they normally do in playoff losses. And he’s trying to deflect and shift blame from things he could control to things he can’t

Honestly this whole sequence highlights how badly the rules on a catch are written. Which takes precedence? What is the sequence? It’s pretty clear that both players had hands on the ball when Cooks knee goes down. Now…do we go with split possession goes to the O or pivot to surviving the ground?