21 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

I forget which beat writer it was but someone was saying recently when talking to Ojomo he has a very business savy mind and he's already mentioned testing free agency even though he's a year away still. You probably aren't getting him cheap or on a team friendly deal. With big contracts going to Carter and Davis, he's probably walking.

Cant blame him or Milton. Short careers. Secure the bag

Unbelievable that Moorehead is returning lmao. What in the hell is going on down there at the Novacare. Also Parks Frazier is staying. and some others. Still no word on Patullo. He probably stays, because all the worst coaches seem destined to stay.

Just now, pgcd3 said:

@LeanMeanGM

1 hour ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Lane seems like the guys that's always going to be working out and will get incredibly ripped once he does stop playing and stops worrying about his bodyweight. He doesn't strike me as a guy whose going to completely stop and get fat.

Don't get too excited.

2 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

@LeanMeanGM

Yep dude has nine lives. I’ll be honest I don’t know if he’s good or bad but he’s goofy

If there’s ever a nuclear event in this country, if I’m in the same room as Aaron Moorehead I know I have a chance

2 hours ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

No one‘s giving them a trophy. We also never said they were a juggernaut or some great team. All people said was the Super Bowl was determined by the Rams and the Seahawks playing in the NFC championship game because people thought they were the two best teams. Which kind of played itself out as all their games against each other were close and came down to the wire. Literally the point differential in those games that they played were three points in three games. Which means the grand total of margin of victory for the Seahawks in the three games they played against Rams was one point per game.

Furthermore, it wasn’t the patriots as the second best team. The Patriots had one of the easiest schedules in the last 30 years. It’s why Maye and their offense never looked good all playoffs and probably fortunate Bo nix broke his ankle cause scoring 1 TD because of stidham doesn’t make them look much better than the rams in Chicago. Furthermore they had more turnovers than tds on offense in their run. They had 8 turnovers and 7 total offensive tds in 4 games.

Or maybe even when the Rams were playing well against Seattle in Seattle, he still was finding ways to crap on Matt Stafford. Literally Seahawks defense from mid October (jags game Oct 13th) onward gave up 25 or more points just twice. Both times to rams and stafford. Furthermore Stafford threw for 457 yards and 3 tds in a loss scoring 37 and 374 yards and 3 tds scoring 27. No INTs. Qb ratings of 110.7 and 127.5. So he wasn’t great against the Bears. Although 4th quarter he left the field giving them a touchdown lead when they had to have it. Ditto twice in Carolina. Meanwhile hurts wasn’t great against the niners who were far more banged up on defense then any team in the field and was at home. Meanwhile go constant Stafford bashing as he’s playing better than any other Qb vs. Seattle over the last 3 months.

I don’t know maybe the glazing of Matt Stafford was warranted as he threw for 4700 yards, 46 touchdown passes which led the league and had a quarterback rating of 109.5 which was second in the league. He went against 6 defenses who were top 10 in points allowed, he averaged 26.7 ppg in those 6 contests. I don’t know might be warranted. Instead of every time we come on here it’s Matt Stafford nitpicking and Stafford constant obsession to bash him even when he plays well. Meanwhile if that were hurts he gets very quiet or goes off on tangents not associated with his bad performance. and I’m not somebody who hates hurts. But if we’re gonna be Matt Stafford nitpick all the time and hurts tangents not associated with his poor performance in a game we are discussing then you better expect people to do the same nitpicking skippy does with Stafford to Jalen hurts.

Furthermore, biggest issue is this nobody on here said the Rams were some juggernaut or great team. Like he seems to imagine everyone saying. He puts words in people’s mouth and went off on a tangent about it. All people said was the Super Bowl was determined in the NFC title game because people thought those were the two best team teams. Which this year isn’t some grand accomplishment. Really hard to not say that when the Broncos lost the starting quarterback. He told us all year that the bills weren’t any good so they nearly lost to that bills team at home (which he told me repeatedly told me bills have no chance to win it all and were not good). And the Patriots just got their ass kicked by Seattle. Meanwhile, the Rams every time they played Seattle, it was down to the wire. Furthermore every loss ths rams had was by 1 score. Only seattle and the rams managed to do that all year including the playoffs. Seattle being the best team and arguably their biggest challenge was rams. Heck some of their own players said it. If you wanna say the Rams aren’t second best team is fine but acting like the rams getting to nfc title game and weren’t one of 4 best teams in the NFL is just naive or foolishness.

However, if skippy is gonna make the argument, there’s no way the Rams were while having top 3 strength of schedule and the top strength of victory all while scoring the most points in the league, but then tell me all season that the Eagles were one of if not still the best team. That’s a problem especially while losing to a banged up niners team that got smoked a week later by 35 against the team who were in dogfight against the rams.

The whole who's best thing is mostly subjective, and more often than not the "best" teams don't even face off in the super bowl, let alone the playoffs or conference championship games. Also, matchups are a thing, and Seattle was just a really bad matchup for the Pats. I think had they faced the Rams it would've been a much more competitive game that they have a good shot at winning. Sure, the Patriots had a weak schedule, but that's out of their control and they can only play who's in front of them. We had the third easiest schedule in 2022 when we made it to the Super Bowl, so were we frauds then too since we fell short?

You can't discredit the Pats' playoff run either due to poor QB play from their opponents, or unfortunate injuries. I mean, the Patriots defense had something to do with Stroud giving away INTs, and I don't recall anyone here complaining about the Eagles making it to the super bowl when we knocked Brock Purdy out. Maye didn't play well all postseason, but it wouldn't have mattered had they won it all - go and look at Peyton Mannings postseason stats when he won his first Super Bowl. I don't view the Pats as frauds; they just fell short.

In regard to the Rams/Seattle, I don't really know if either were hands down the best team this season. I do know I certainly didn't view either as a clear 1 or 2, but none of that even matters. The Patriots were pretty clearly viewed as the best team in 2007 when they went undefeated during the regular season, yet they lost to a Giants wild card team in the Super Bowl. Again, matchups matter.

I don’t know what to make of Patullo still being around. What the hell could his role possibly be? He’s s job would be at least a couple of rungs down. Credit to him for swallowing his ego, or maybe no one else in the league was willing to give him a decent job.

As for Moorehead, he must have some sort of role with the game plan that is invaluable because he hasn’t developed anyone or led a group that appeared well coached during his time here.

Very happy to see that Loeffler appears to be returning.

2 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

I don’t know what to make of Patullo still being around. What the hell could his role possibly be? He’s s job would be at least a couple of rungs down. Credit to him for swallowing his ego, or maybe no one else in the league was willing to give him a decent job.

As for Moorehead, he must have some sort of role with the game plan that is invaluable because he hasn’t developed anyone or led a group that appeared well coached during his time here.

Patullo will be the Hype Man to Sirianni

30 minutes ago, ToastJenkins said:

Cant blame him or Milton. Short careers. Secure the bag

Yep, plus they already got a ring, so might as well protect their future financially now that they can.

2 hours ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Lane seems like the guys that's always going to be working out and will get incredibly ripped once he does stop playing and stops worrying about his bodyweight. He doesn't strike me as a guy whose going to completely stop and get fat.

Yeah that's what I was thinking. He's a workout warrior whether he retires or not, he'll keep going. I wonder if he has a future in coaching strength and conditioning.

27 minutes ago, pgcd3 said:

Are you F'ing with me, Howie? Who the hell does Moorehead have pictures of? Unbelievable

I think Loeffler is going to be out once a new QB coach will be hired. But Parks Frazier will be staying. If he's not PGC, then what is he? Just offensive assistant?

28 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

Very happy to see that Loeffler appears to be returning.

I'm not sure that will hold.

Parks Frazier and Montgomery DaGorder are both still on the club

19 hours ago, ToastJenkins said:

At least we have the Olympics

And the Italian woman in mixed doubles curling is a 10

A 10?

Former offensive coordinator Kevin Patullo’s future with the team also remains uncertain. He was removed from the job last month by Sirianni following his first season as a play-caller, but he currently remains with the Eagles.

This part is just so weird to me. Why?

13 minutes ago, MF POON said:

The whole who's best thing is mostly subjective, and more often than not the "best" teams don't even face off in the super bowl, let alone the playoffs or conference championship games. Also, matchups are a thing, and Seattle was just a really bad matchup for the Pats. I think had they faced the Rams it would've been a much more competitive game that they have a good shot at winning. Sure, the Patriots had a weak schedule, but that's out of their control and they can only play who's in front of them. We had the third easiest schedule in 2022 when we made it to the Super Bowl, so were we frauds then too since we fell short?

You can't discredit the Pats' playoff run either due to poor QB play from their opponents, or unfortunate injuries. I mean, the Patriots defense had something to do with Stroud giving away INTs, and I don't recall anyone here complaining about the Eagles making it to the super bowl when we knocked Brock Purdy out. Maye didn't play well all postseason, but it wouldn't have mattered had they won it all - go and look at Peyton Mannings postseason stats when he won his first Super Bowl. I don't view the Pats as frauds; they just fell short.

In regard to the Rams/Seattle, I don't really know if either were hands down the best team this season. I do know I certainly didn't view either as a clear 1 or 2, but none of that even matters. The Patriots were pretty clearly viewed as the best team in 2007 when they went undefeated during the regular season, yet they lost to a Giants wild card team in the Super Bowl. Again, matchups matter.

First the 2022 eagles played the chiefs and weren’t blown out in that game. Matchup or not. Add on the eagles blew out two playoff teams til the Super Bowl.

Furthermore the 2022 eagles also didn’t have more turnovers than touchdowns on offense that entire playoff run. you have be pretty bad offensively to accomplish more turnovers on offense then tds.balso the analytics didn’t show our Qb to be one of the worst all time playoff performers over an entire playoffs.

The fact of matter is the best team New England faced in the afc the way was missing their starting Qb and struggled to even win that game. Heck the only reason they scored a TD in the broncos game and the following 3 quarters of the Super Bowl was stidham being horrible at his job. Furthermore NE’s schedule was an all time worse. Like the worst in the last two decades. A softer schedule is one thing, but it was analytically the EASIEST in the entire nfl and in a very long time for a SB team.

This isn’t anything against NE defense. That unit i actually thought was good. Actually showed they could play well against a top tier offense. Held Buffalo to 20 earlier in the year. NE offense faced no top 10 defenses in ppg til the playoffs. Guess what happened? Dramatically fell off a cliff. They went from top scoring offenses at 26.5 ppg (8th) to offense avg 15 ppg (that’s even worse than the eagles who were 20.6 ppg vs. top 10 defenses and NE got a garbage time td vs seattle). Thats not fraudulent but does tell me that NE didn’t lived up to their offensive standards they had shown against inferior competition. It wasn’t just a drop off it was 11 ppg drop.

Injuries or not, every team has injuries. don’t want to hear about injuries, hurts in 2022 was dealing with a shoulder injury. They scored 38, 31 and 35 points. Granted lesser defenses outside of SF that year. Furthermore eagles in 2022 didn’t see dramatic fall of the cliff offensive numbers as soon as the playoffs started with a Qb with an injured shoulder. Literally New England went from top 10 offense to a team barely managing to score 15ppg on offense. I don’t want to hear oh matchups or injuries. If Maye is an mvp caliber Qb and that offense was truly dynamic as they showed in the regular season then shouldn’t see an 11 point drop off and one of the worst analytical displays of QBing and postseason offenses since 2000.

So let me put this all together: New England had the easiest strength of schedule in the league, second worst strength of victory (Dallas worse lol) in the nfl, analytically worst QB performance in a playoff run since 2000, barely beat a broncos team with Jared stidham starting his first game all season, got blown out by 16 (frankly garbage td made it look better) a Seahawks team which is the best team analytically/statistically they faced all (with their Qb healthy) year. But they just came up short…. They aren’t frauds but they also could very very VERY well been a benefactor of fortuitous circumstance and maybe the argument has some validity to it that the rams/Seahawks nfc tittle game may very well have been for the Super Bowl…

Discredit or not, I’m not buying they were the second best team because they won the AFC especially when they barely beat a broncos team who just lost their starting Qb a week before. you wanna talk matchups matter, the rams had the toughest strength of schedule of any playoff team and best strength of victory of any playoff team. They only got slotted to the 5th seed cause the number one seed was there with 14 wins and played in the toughest division in football. Yeah matchups mattered as NE benefited from a fortuitous schedule, bo nix breaking his ankle then getting punked by best team they faced all year that had their Qb. Can say they can only play the schedule they are given, that’s accurate. However it also means they might very well have not been nearly as good as their record indicated and were super fortuitous until they faced the best team and looked like they didn’t belong on offense much like most of the postseason. We’ve seen this also with other teams in the past. Vikings in 2017 come to mind

Seattle wasn’t the best team? They tied for most wins in the nfl, won arguably the hardest division, had a top 10 defense (1st in ppg), had a top 10 offense (2nd in ppg), second highest strength to victory of any playoff team besides the rams and top 5 SOS of all playoff teams. NE losing to a giants team that got hot is one thing. Happens best team may not win that singular game. However resumes for Seattle speak volumes for how good Seattle was this year. Feels very disingenuous to not say they were the best when their resume, analytics and performance showed otherwise

So if we are coming to the conclusion that Seattle wasn’t the best team after blasting the patriots in the SB while having all those accolades then i guess we should make the same argument for the 2024 eagles based on your logic. I’m guessing you aren’t going to do that but you will for Seattle…

At this point not responding anymore. It’s been ridiculous all year with skippy downplaying everyone else in the nfl but the eagles. There’s other good teams on this league whether he wants to accept it or not.

4 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

This part is just so weird to me. Why?

How can the two besties have sleepovers all the time if Patullo is an assistant WR coach at Butte Community College?

58 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

@LeanMeanGM

10 minutes ago, Outlaw said:

A 10?

Well I mean if she's Italian then yeah, she's a 10. .......jk

1 hour ago, pgcd3 said:

1 hour ago, pgcd3 said:

What in the actual F?