April 29, 20214 yr Michael Collins takes photo of the Moon Lander taking off to dock with the orbiter. What is the Orb in the background. 1973The first use of CGI in a movie came in 1973 during a scene in "Westworld." Until the late 1990s CGI was used sparingly, but in 1995 Toy Story became the first full-length CG feature
May 8, 20214 yr Author On 4/9/2021 at 3:17 PM, Toastrel said: Just because you are ignorant and do not understand the forces involved, does not make them imaginary. Just your ability to reason. That seems to be imaginary. @Seventy_Yard_FG What forces involved? You gonna make some up?? We already have enough made up forces as it is, we don't need anymore. Problem is, you know that photograph is ridiculous but unfortunately for you globers that would absolutely have to be the case if we lived on a sphere. The nasholes could easily prove that we're on a globe by turning the hubble telescope or shuttle around and zooming in on ships, buildings, mountains, airplanes and whatever else you can thing of being upside down. They can't/won't do that for several reasons, one of which is because there is no hubble telescope in outerspace and another is because we don't live on a spinning sphere. I hate to be the one to tell you toasty, but you're the ignorant one.
May 8, 20214 yr On 4/29/2021 at 2:14 PM, jsdarkstar said: Michael Collins takes photo of the Moon Lander taking off to dock with the orbiter. What is the Orb in the background. 1973The first use of CGI in a movie came in 1973 during a scene in "Westworld." Until the late 1990s CGI was used sparingly, but in 1995 Toy Story became the first full-length CG feature It's the flat Earth under the dome. DO YOUR RESEARCH!!
May 8, 20214 yr 8 hours ago, EagleVA said: @Seventy_Yard_FG What forces involved? You gonna make some up?? We already have enough made up forces as it is, we don't need anymore. Problem is, you know that photograph is ridiculous but unfortunately for you globers that would absolutely have to be the case if we lived on a sphere. The nasholes could easily prove that we're on a globe by turning the hubble telescope or shuttle around and zooming in on ships, buildings, mountains, airplanes and whatever else you can thing of being upside down. They can't/won't do that for several reasons, one of which is because there is no hubble telescope in outerspace and another is because we don't live on a spinning sphere. I hate to be the one to tell you toasty, but you're the ignorant one. These are all excellent points
May 8, 20214 yr 5 minutes ago, Seventy_Yard_FG said: These are all excellent points You’re joking, right?
May 8, 20214 yr 5 minutes ago, EagleJoe8 said: You’re joking, right? Which points do you disagree with and where are your facts to back them up?
May 8, 20214 yr 1 minute ago, Seventy_Yard_FG said: Which points do you disagree with and where are your facts to back them up? They don’t turn the Hubble around because it’s purpose is to look into deep space, not to prove anything to idiotic flat earthers. What "facts” did he present? Zero. He gave conjecture and nothing more. Proof we live on a globe? The bottom of boats and ships being cut off by the horizon. Not possible on a flat earth. How about flat earthers themselves proving we live on a globe? Ever looked at the stars? How can we get varying constellations throughout the year if we are on a stationary plane that sits in one place? Seriously man, EagleVa is an idiot that blocks people who prove him wrong.
May 8, 20214 yr 3 minutes ago, EagleJoe8 said: They don’t turn the Hubble around because it’s purpose is to look into deep space, not to prove anything to idiotic flat earthers. What "facts” did he present? Zero. He gave conjecture and nothing more. Proof we live on a globe? The bottom of boats and ships being cut off by the horizon. Not possible on a flat earth. How about flat earthers themselves proving we live on a globe? Ever looked at the stars? How can we get varying constellations throughout the year if we are on a stationary plane that sits in one place? Seriously man, EagleVa is an idiot that blocks people who prove him wrong. Well your first point about the Hubble scope is also mere conjecture not supported by facts, but I’d grant the second picture with the boat on the horizon does raise an eyebrow with me tldr on the videos. the argument about the stars moving doesn’t change anything for me
May 8, 20214 yr 2 minutes ago, Seventy_Yard_FG said: Well your first point about the Hubble scope is also mere conjecture not supported by facts, but I’d grant the second picture with the boat on the horizon does raise an eyebrow with me tldr on the videos. the argument about the stars moving doesn’t change anything for me https://asd.gsfc.nasa.gov/archive/hubble/a_pdf/news/facts/FS14.pdf Tells you the purpose of the Hubble in the first paragraph. So how do you explain varying constellations throughout the year if we don’t move, and the sky just spins in one place? We should see the same star formations throughout the year. As for the videos, the first one is only a few minutes, and the 2nd one makes it’s point in roughly half the 27 minutes. You don’t need to watch the whole thing.
May 8, 20214 yr 14 minutes ago, EagleJoe8 said: They don’t turn the Hubble around because it’s purpose is to look into deep space, not to prove anything to idiotic flat earthers. What "facts” did he present? Zero. He gave conjecture and nothing more. Proof we live on a globe? The bottom of boats and ships being cut off by the horizon. Not possible on a flat earth. How about flat earthers themselves proving we live on a globe? Ever looked at the stars? How can we get varying constellations throughout the year if we are on a stationary plane that sits in one place? Seriously man, EagleVa is an idiot that blocks people who prove him wrong. Well now you are arguing with someone who thinks the election was stolen and now possibly what shape the earth is. Also Brett Farve looks like.he put some weight on
May 8, 20214 yr 1 minute ago, Bwestbrook36 said: Well now you are arguing with someone who thinks the election was stolen and now possibly what shape the earth is. Also Brett Farve looks like.he put some weight on Haha.
May 8, 20214 yr 1 minute ago, EagleJoe8 said: Haha. Have you checked out the corona thread? Things took a turn for the flat over there too.
May 8, 20214 yr 4 minutes ago, Bwestbrook36 said: Have you checked out the corona thread? Things took a turn for the flat over there too. No, I don’t read that thread.
May 8, 20214 yr 11 hours ago, EagleVA said: @Seventy_Yard_FG What forces involved? You gonna make some up?? We already have enough made up forces as it is, we don't need anymore. Problem is, you know that photograph is ridiculous but unfortunately for you globers that would absolutely have to be the case if we lived on a sphere. The nasholes could easily prove that we're on a globe by turning the hubble telescope or shuttle around and zooming in on ships, buildings, mountains, airplanes and whatever else you can thing of being upside down. They can't/won't do that for several reasons, one of which is because there is no hubble telescope in outerspace and another is because we don't live on a spinning sphere. I hate to be the one to tell you toasty, but you're the ignorant one. You should check out google earth. It’s pretty swell
May 8, 20214 yr 5 minutes ago, paco said: You should check out google earth. It’s pretty swell What was really silly about this comment he made, is even if NASA did exactly what he said and it showed a globe earth, he wouldn't believe it anyway.
May 8, 20214 yr 32 minutes ago, paco said: You should check out google earth. It’s pretty swell They are not upside down!
May 8, 20214 yr 40 minutes ago, Boogyman said: What was really silly about this comment he made, is even if NASA did exactly what he said and it showed a globe earth, he wouldn't believe it anyway. Exactly.
May 8, 20214 yr 2 hours ago, Boogyman said: What was really silly about this comment he made, is even if NASA did exactly what he said and it showed a globe earth, he wouldn't believe it anyway. They don’t have to turn the Hubble around there’s plenty of cameras on the ISS looking right back at us. "Oh it’s CGI” right? Well damn they have some great LIVE CGI technology then. Their budget must be yuge!
May 8, 20214 yr 11 minutes ago, DBW said: They don’t have to turn the Hubble around there’s plenty of cameras on the ISS looking right back at us. "Oh it’s CGI” right? Well damn they have some great LIVE CGI technology then. Their budget must be yuge! Yeah. WE know that. But these weirdos don't follow logic. They just want to feel like they know and have an understanding of things the rest of "us" dont. It's kinda sad.
May 8, 20214 yr 3 hours ago, paco said: You should check out google earth. It’s pretty swell Wait hold up, so he is admitting that space does exist and there are things floating in space that came from earth??
May 9, 20214 yr 19 hours ago, Seventy_Yard_FG said: Well your first point about the Hubble scope is also mere conjecture not supported by facts, but I’d grant the second picture with the boat on the horizon does raise an eyebrow with me tldr on the videos. the argument about the stars moving doesn’t change anything for me Or just lack of understanding how that marvel of technology works on your part.
May 9, 20214 yr On 4/29/2021 at 8:45 PM, mr_hunt said: https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/04/15/987164563/scientists-create-early-embryos-that-are-part-human-part-monkey
Create an account or sign in to comment