May 19, 20214 yr 18 minutes ago, toolg said: Yeah? But there were no moon landing pics in existence before 1969. Explain that! Maybe it took you guys in the US a little longer to get them ( not sure how, seeing as it was your country that did it ) Here is the West Australian newspaper from July 22, 1969. So no one had seen these pictures before the 90's, but here it is in a newspaper two days after it happened.
May 19, 20214 yr Oh, boy. Ted Aranda. THE APOLLO MOON LANDING HOAX: ABSOLUTE PROOF, PART 1 OF 6 Can't find anything about this guy on the Internet. But his video says he's an Advanced Amateur Astronomer. Yeah he's qualified. In the first 5 minutes, he mentions mass shooting hoaxes. I stopped the video after that. Tell the parents of Sandy Hook that there children aren't really dead. People Like Alex Jones furthers that conspiracy and he was ruined financially because of it. That's a red line for me. Eagle VA I'll tell you why they haven't done it, because they can't, they've never been to the Moon.....EVER!!'
May 19, 20214 yr 43 minutes ago, downundermike said: @LeanMeanGM you should ask @EagleVA about this seeing as he has everyone else on ignore. If the moon landing photos were not available until the 90's, how did they end up in a book published in the 70's ?? @EagleVA
May 19, 20214 yr So this is a fake photo according to the video because the horizon behind Buzz is at his head, when the camera mounted is Neil's chest. What the conspiracy Freak blows off, is that Buzz is standing in a crater that's at least a foot deep. We don't know what Neil was standing on that was never mentioned. But let me guess. Neil was standing on higher ground resulting in the elevation of the camera, and the horizon being at his head. But the Conspiracy Freak never brings this up as a possibility. He just states it's fake as if it's a Fact. Weak. Eagle VA I'll tell you why they haven't done it, because they can't, they've never been to the Moon.....EVER!!'
May 19, 20214 yr 3 minutes ago, jsdarkstar said: So this is a fake photo according to the video because the horizon behind Buzz is at his head, when the camera mounted is Neil's chest. What the conspiracy Freak blows off, is that Buzz is standing in a crater that's at least a foot deep. We don't know what Neil was standing on that was never mentioned. But let me guess. Neil was standing on higher ground resulting in the elevation of the camera, and the horizon being at his head. But the Conspiracy Freak never brings this up as a possibility. He just states it's fake as if it's a Fact. Weak. He’s using a selfie stick, obviously.
May 19, 20214 yr Author 1 hour ago, jsdarkstar said: Yeah, its not like photos of the moon landing aren't in Magazines and books pre Internet. LOL. Here's one from a Special Issue of Life Magazine 1969. But hey these photos can't be found anywhere pre 1990. August 11, 1969 I'm thinking maybe you should re-read what I posted, I didn't say no photos of the Moon Landing hoax were posted.
May 19, 20214 yr Author 1 hour ago, toolg said: Yeah? But there were no moon landing pics in existence before 1969. Explain that! Yep, this site is full of jackarses.
May 19, 20214 yr 1 minute ago, EagleVA said: Yep, this site is full of jackarses. Bucking for a leadership position?
May 20, 20214 yr 11 hours ago, downundermike said: It would be impossible to continue a conspiracy of this magnitude. To many moving parts and people involved. False. Anyone who is about to blab goes over the ice wall. Do your research
May 20, 20214 yr 11 hours ago, paco said: False. Anyone who is about to blab goes over the ice wall. Do your research Eagle VA I'll tell you why they haven't done it, because they can't, they've never been to the Moon.....EVER!!'
May 21, 20214 yr On 5/19/2021 at 12:11 AM, EagleVA said: No, the reason they won't do it is because they know they'll get busted, that's why they didn't show stars on the Moon, astronomers would have pointed out their fakery just like professional photographers pointed out their fake photos. It's a damn shame to see so many brainwashed fools on this site. So to fool everyone, instead of putting stars in the background of the set to fake the moon landing because they might get that detail wrong, they just left them out and hoped no one would notice. That’s your take?
May 21, 20214 yr Maybe I missed it over the past 50 pages (or forgot) but since gravity is a farce to them, was there a Flat Earth explanation for the tides?
May 21, 20214 yr Author 24 minutes ago, PoconoDon said: Maybe I missed it over the past 50 pages (or forgot) but since gravity is a farce to them, was there a Flat Earth explanation for the tides? Ahh yes, the magical force of gravity. It's so funny, as a child I had issues with the idea that one object's gravity can grab a hold of another object and have it orbit itself. Think about the Moon landing hoax, so we had one spacecraft on the Moon's surface while another spacecraft is orbiting the Moon, you gotta ask, if the Earth's gravity can make the Moon orbit itself, why didnt it grab the much smaller object (the Moon orbiting spacecraft) and do some things to it, like yank it out of orbit around the Moon, or pull it back to Earth? As for the tides, the Earth's gravity grabs the Moon but yet the Moon's gravity is grabbing our oceans causing the tides......it's a magic show guys and the magician is the one and only NASA.
May 21, 20214 yr Hey Pocono, take notice how he didn't answer. Apparently, no YouTuber has an answer for him. He must not have time for your silliness.
May 21, 20214 yr 3 minutes ago, EagleJoe8 said: Hey Pocono, take notice how he didn't answer. Apparently, no YouTuber has an answer for him. He must not have time for your silliness. No, the answer is there 1 hour ago, EagleVA said: Ahh yes, the magical force of gravity. It's so funny, as a child I had issues with the idea that one object's gravity can grab a hold of another object and have it orbit itself. Think about the Moon landing hoax, so we had one spacecraft on the Moon's surface while another spacecraft is orbiting the Moon, you gotta ask, if the Earth's gravity can make the Moon orbit itself, why didnt it grab the much smaller object (the Moon orbiting spacecraft) and do some things to it, like yank it out of orbit around the Moon, or pull it back to Earth? As for the tides, the Earth's gravity grabs the Moon but yet the Moon's gravity is grabbing our oceans causing the tides......it's a magic show guys and the magician is the one and only NASA. NASA causes the tides. Is there anything they cant do?
May 21, 20214 yr Just now, paco said: No, the answer is there NASA causes the tides. Is there anything they cant do? Get Howie Roseman fired I guess.
May 21, 20214 yr On 5/19/2021 at 12:11 AM, EagleVA said: No, the reason they won't do it is because they know they'll get busted, that's why they didn't show stars on the Moon, astronomers would have pointed out their fakery just like professional photographers pointed out their fake photos. It's a damn shame to see so many brainwashed fools on this site. If the stars and galaxies and planets and moons are all fake, why do we need astronomers to study them?
May 21, 20214 yr 2 minutes ago, DBW said: If the stars and galaxies and planets and moons are all fake, why do we need astronomers to study them? To legitimize the lie. Duh!
May 21, 20214 yr 2 minutes ago, DBW said: If the stars and galaxies and planets and moons are all fake, why do we need astronomers to study them? He'll tell you we don't need them. They're government plants to help the lie, or he'll try to tell you they're falling for the lie just like everyone else.
May 21, 20214 yr If you guys are amused by @EagleVA’s fantasies about the flat earth, you should head over to the corona thread and read about vaccine shedding.
May 21, 20214 yr 10 hours ago, paco said: No, the answer is there NASA causes the tides. Is there anything they cant do? I dare not bring multiple body astrophysics into the discussion.
May 21, 20214 yr 3 minutes ago, BBE said: I dare not bring multiple body astrophysics into the discussion. Anything he doesn’t have an answer to, he calls a NASA lie then puts you on ignore.
Create an account or sign in to comment