January 15Jan 15 Author 8 minutes ago, DEagle7 said: It's only real to people who aren't retarded and actually understand what happened. Libtards are excluded, obviously.
January 16Jan 16 6 hours ago, paco said: Yeah! Do your research bro! it's so damn cute to watch a poster cling to this bombshell and defend the stupid thread that they have locked multiple times. btw - paco, do you presently own, or have you ever owned a laptop?
January 16Jan 16 Author 7 hours ago, paco said: Yeah! Do your research bro! As a non-libtard, what about the story is fake to you? The laptop was verified. Discussion of the NY Post story was censored at the behest of taxpayer funded intelligence agencies for the sole purpose of helping democrats in a presidential election. This is all well-documented.
January 16Jan 16 Author 38 minutes ago, Tnt4philly said: Well documented I tell you!!!!! Have you seen all the tweets? 22 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said: I have trouble getting into the minds of libtards because of healthy testosterone levels, but I always wonder which part of the story they push back on. Is it that they think the laptop wasn't confirmed as real? It was. Is it because they think the story wasn't censored off social media prior to the election? It was. Or is it because they think our well-respected intelligence agencies didn't run cover to help democrats win an election? Because they did. Or do they acknowledge all that, but just think none of it is a big deal? These are rhetorical questions because I know Tnt4philly is too cracked out to answer coherently, and Beta is too retarded to form sentences without communicating through gifs.
January 16Jan 16 7 minutes ago, Kz! said: I have trouble getting into the minds of libtards because of healthy testosterone levels, but I always wonder which part of the story they push back on. Is it that they think the laptop wasn't confirmed as real? It was. Is it because they think the story wasn't censored off social media prior to the election? It was. Or is it because they think our well-respected intelligence agencies didn't run cover to help democrats win an election? Because they did. Or do they acknowledge all that, but just think none of it is a big deal? These are rhetorical questions because I know Tnt4philly is too cracked out to answer coherently, and Beta is too retarded to form sentences without communicating through gifs. When was Hunter Biden running for President?
January 16Jan 16 Author 14 minutes ago, DiPros said: When was Hunter Biden running for President? Right, so I guess you fall under the "all of it is true, it's just not a big deal" umbrella of libtards. I mean, wild that taxpayer funded intel and law enforcement agencies are acting as pr firms for democrats and encouraging online censorship of true stories in an election year, but it's just not a heckin big deal because no one is voting for Hunter, after all.
January 16Jan 16 7 minutes ago, Kz! said: Right, so I guess you fall under the "all of it is true, it's just not a big deal" umbrella of libtards. I mean, wild that taxpayer funded intel and law enforcement agencies are acting as pr firms for democrats and encouraging online censorship of true stories in an election year, but it's just not a heckin big deal because no one is voting for Hunter, after all. I don't believe any of it, just like you don't believe your guy is a complete idiot.
January 16Jan 16 Author 11 minutes ago, DiPros said: I don't believe any of it, just like you don't believe your guy is a complete idiot. Oh, in that case lol, lmao even. OK.
January 17Jan 17 On 1/16/2025 at 1:25 PM, Alpha_TATEr said: btw - paco, do you presently own, or have you ever owned a laptop? I have never owned a laptop. I have been using laptops exclusively for 23 years.
January 18Jan 18 Mostly laptops as well. During Covid though I built a gaming rig for the first time since maybe 2000. It was too powerful to resist as a workstation, but I'm back now to the laptop for work and the desktop is pretty much gaming again (though I do some side work on it still)
March 6Mar 6 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 "JUST IN: Hunter Biden asks judge to drop his laptop lawsuit, claiming he's "millions in debt"—worsened by LA wildfires. In court filings, he blames dwindling art and book sales for his financial woes, saying his rented home became "unlivable." The lawsuit targeted Trump aide Garrett Ziegler for exposing his laptop data, but Hunter now says he can't afford to litigate. He's also tied up in another case over the laptop’s leaked contents. Now he's out of cash - NYP"
March 6Mar 6 Wasn’t there an official investigation into this that resulted in charges filed and a conviction? Surely all the verified evidence was submitted then, right?
March 6Mar 6 21 minutes ago, MidMoFo said: Wasn’t there an official investigation into this that resulted in charges filed and a conviction? Surely all the verified evidence was submitted then, right? Lawyers don't work for free. Especially the caliber that he's probably using.
March 6Mar 6 17 minutes ago, rambo said: Lawyers don't work for free. Especially the caliber that he's probably using. Do you have to be a high paid lawyer to present evidence that’s supposedly "verified” and apparently just accepted as public knowledge? What does how much Hunter Biden pays for a lawyer have to do with prosecution presenting evidence in court?
March 7Mar 7 20 hours ago, It Hurts said: 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 "JUST IN: Hunter Biden asks judge to drop his laptop lawsuit, claiming he's "millions in debt"—worsened by LA wildfires. In court filings, he blames dwindling art and book sales for his financial woes, saying his rented home became "unlivable." The lawsuit targeted Trump aide Garrett Ziegler for exposing his laptop data, but Hunter now says he can't afford to litigate. He's also tied up in another case over the laptop’s leaked contents. Now he's out of cash - NYP" wow man, what a bombshell. thank god they got hunter out of the WH.
Create an account or sign in to comment