October 19, 20204 yr 3 minutes ago, Diehardfan said: LIberals: It's all fake from Russia Rudy: We have an email from Hunter's attorney George Mesires to the store asking to get the drive back last week on October 13th at 6:58:59 PM Liberals: We are going to ignore that and mock Rudy, scream Russia louder, and go with the Shaggy defense You can go on and believe Rudy. Mocking us for not believing him while you swallow Trump is laughable, man. Laughable.
October 19, 20204 yr 4 minutes ago, Diehardfan said: LIberals: It's all fake from Russia Rudy: We have an email from Hunter's attorney George Mesires to the store asking to get the drive back last week on October 13th at 6:58:59 PM Liberals: We are going to ignore that and mock Rudy, scream Russia louder, and go with the Shaggy defense Putting all your trust in Rudy to deliver has worked out so well in the past, why stop now, right?
October 19, 20204 yr Just now, Toastrel said: You can go on and believe Rudy. Mocking us for not believing him while you swallow Trump is laughable, man. Laughable. LOL there is an email from Hunter's attorney to the store talking about a phone conversation where he asked for it back. Hey...can we maybe get that imaginary laptop back that doesn't exist? Thanks.
October 19, 20204 yr Just now, Diehardfan said: LOL there is an email from Hunter's attorney to the store talking about a phone conversation where he asked for it back. Hey...can we maybe get that imaginary laptop back that doesn't exist? Thanks. Another email? From an attorney? Asking for a client's property? REALLY!?!??!?!
October 19, 20204 yr 4 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: Putting all your trust in Rudy to deliver has worked out so well in the past, why stop now, right? Can we maybe get that fake thing back? Thanks 3 minutes ago, Toastrel said: Another email? From an attorney? Asking for a client's property? REALLY!?!??!?! Property that doesn't exist to liberals. The idiot actually called to ask for it back and then sent a follow up email. I am not arguing what may or may not be on there, but it obviously exists.
October 19, 20204 yr 6 minutes ago, Diehardfan said: Can we maybe get that fake thing back? Thanks Where does it say, "please return my client's property to us"? Further, why have the actual emails still not surfaced, just the images of them dated months later? If they're not trying to make it look fake, they are doing a terrible job of it.
October 19, 20204 yr 4 minutes ago, Toastrel said: Another email? From an attorney? Asking for a client's property? REALLY!?!??!?! The email doesn't even say as much. This is typically what happens you go all in on Rudy, you get hung out to dry like a moron.
October 19, 20204 yr 12 minutes ago, Diehardfan said: LIberals: It's all fake from Russia Rudy: We have an email from Hunter's attorney George Mesires after asking for the drive back on the phone last week on October 13th at 6:58:59 PM Liberals: We are going to ignore that and mock Rudy, scream Russia louder, and go with the Shaggy defense You want to back that up with a citation chief? Because I sure as hell cannot verify it. And it's a stupid claim anyway, because Rudy does not have the hard drive. The FBI does. Rudy claims to have a clone of the drive made by the shop. The only thing Mesires has said about this is that it's false. That's it. Try again sparky.
October 19, 20204 yr 9 minutes ago, Diehardfan said: LOL there is an email from Hunter's attorney to the store talking about a phone conversation where he asked for it back. Hey...can we maybe get that imaginary laptop back that doesn't exist? Thanks. Is there a recording of this phone conversation where the attorney asks for it back? Because this email makes no mention any such thing. You'll have to forgive me if I don't take Rudy's word for it.
October 19, 20204 yr 6 minutes ago, Diehardfan said: Can we maybe get that fake thing back? Thanks Property that doesn't exist. The idiot actually called to ask for it back and then sent a follow up email. This email? Quote John Paul: Thank you for speaking with me tonight. As I indicated, I am a lawyer for Hunter Biden and I appreciate you reviewing your records on this matter. Thank you. George This doesn't confirm anything that you allege that was said on the prior phone call. Nothing about returning laptops. E-mails can be easy to fake. Come back when you have some actual proof.
October 19, 20204 yr 9 minutes ago, Diehardfan said: Can we maybe get that fake thing back? Thanks Property that doesn't exist. The idiot actually called to ask for it back and then sent a follow up email. LOLOLOLO this email is the lawyer "asking for the laptop back": breathes..
October 19, 20204 yr 13 minutes ago, Diehardfan said: LIberals FBI: It's all fake from Russia and we warned you last spring - via YOUR OWN NSA - Giuliani was targeted to feed false information to spread to the WH. Rudy: We have an email from Hunter's attorney George Mesires after asking for the drive back on the phone last week on October 13th at 6:58:59 PM Liberals: We are going to ignore that and mock Rudy, scream Russia louder, and go with the Shaggy defense fyp
October 19, 20204 yr 1 minute ago, we_gotta_believe said: Where does it say, "please return my client's property to us"? Further, why have the actual emails have still not surfaced, just the images of them dated months later? If they're not trying to make it look fake, they are doing a terrible job of it. It's referencing a phone call the store owners said was to ask for it back. I'm not arguing what is in the emails, if there is video of him engaging in things with possibly under age teens, etc. We will find that out down the line, but it physically exists. The Biden camp isn't even arguing that, so it's physical existence isn't some Russian conspiracy that it is all made up. He obviously left it at the store. We won't find out until after the election what is on there probably. You all can argue about the content I'm not in that mix. Will it matter in this election? Probably not. You all can argue about that too, but if I'm on the left I'm not mocking this as some totally fake story yet because nobody knows. Same goes for people saying there is absolutely child sex acts on there or other incriminating things. We will have to wait and see.
October 19, 20204 yr Just now, toolg said: This email? This doesn't confirm anything that you allege that was said on the prior phone call. Nothing about returning laptops. E-mails can be easy to fake. Come back when you have some actual proof. Yes, it is all fake. The store owner claims he called to ask for it back. We have an email proving they spoke. That collaborates what the owner said IMO. Again, I'm not arguing about the content you all can have fun with that, but it physically exists and the owner made a copy Rudy has. So you all can dance around like idiots mocking it as being fake. People can dance around claiming there is damming evidence on there. Both sides shouldn't be dancing about anything yet because we don't know, but there is a drive. Videos and pictures would be pretty hard to fake if true. We will see.
October 19, 20204 yr 2 hours ago, Diehardfan said: It's referencing a phone call the store owners said was to ask for it back. I'm not arguing what is in the emails, if there is video of him engaging in things with possibly under age teens, etc. We will find that out down the line, but it physically exists. The Biden camp isn't even arguing that, so it's physical existence isn't some Russian conspiracy that it is all made up. He obviously left it at the store. We won't find out until after the election what is on there probably. You all can argue about the content I'm not in that mix. Will it matter in this election? Probably not. You all can argue about that too, but if I'm on the left I'm not mocking this as some totally fake story yet because nobody knows. Same goes for people saying there is absolutely child sex acts on there or other incriminating things. We will have to wait and see. Let's hear a recording of this call or have Mr. Magoo go under oath. Until then, it's not moving the needle. And proving it's his laptop still does not prove the emails in question are real. Only the original email files themselves can do that.
October 19, 20204 yr 4 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: LOLOLOLO this email is the lawyer "asking for the laptop back": breathes.. Yeah, it collaborates what the store owner said happened on the phone. What records would the store owner have to review? If it was a stop immediately phone call there wouldn't be anything to check into. So you can post the rolling eyes emoji all you want.
October 19, 20204 yr Holy s*** dude, this is spycraft 101. It's basic. You realize Rudy was just the cherry on top. He is the textbook profile of what the CIA terms an asset. And this operation has been going on for months. All of these "documents" were fabricated. How do you not see this? You're smarter than this.
October 19, 20204 yr 1 minute ago, Diehardfan said: Yes, it is all fake. The store owner claims he called to ask for it back. We have an email proving they spoke. That collaborates what the owner said IMO. Again, I'm not arguing about the content you all can have fun with that, but it physically exists and the owner made a copy Rudy has. So you all can dance around like idiots mocking it as being fake. People can dance around claiming there is damming evidence on there. Both sides shouldn't be dancing about anything yet because we don't know, but there is a drive. Videos and pictures would be pretty hard to fake if true. We will see. The word, Mr. Grad-Level Statistics Course Wizard, is corroborates. And no, the email absolutely does not corroborate that the attorney asked for the computer back. You are doing it again, lalone.
October 19, 20204 yr 2 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: Let's hear a recording of this call or have Mr. Magoo go on oath. Until then, it's not moving the needle. And proving it's his laptop still does not prove the emails in question are real. Only the original email files themselves can do that. We aren't arguing about that. You can fight it out with others over that one. My point is a drive exists, we have to wait about the content. People mocking it are silly to me the same as people dancing about what is on there. We don't know.
October 19, 20204 yr 4 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: The word, Mr. Grad-Level Statistics Course Wizard, is corroborates. And no, the email absolutely does not corroborate that the attorney asked for the computer back. You are doing it again, lalone. I don't see why an attorney would ask someone to check records about an imaginary event. That doesn't sound like a cease and desist or we are suing you kind of email to me, but whatever. You all are in the 100% fake camp. Fine. Others are in the 100% true on the content. I don't' know personally because I'm waiting to see.
October 19, 20204 yr 1 minute ago, Diehardfan said: Yes, it is all fake. The store owner claims he called to ask for it back. We have an email proving they spoke. That collaborates what the owner said IMO. Again, I'm not arguing about the content you all can have fun with that, but it physically exists and the owner made a copy Rudy has. So you all can dance around like idiots mocking it as being fake. People can dance around claiming there is damming evidence on there. Both sides shouldn't be dancing about anything yet because we don't know, but there is a drive. Videos and pictures would be pretty hard to fake if true. We will see. You realize that the way misinformation campaigns like this work is to mix in false information with a whole bunch of true information, giving the impression that everything is true? If they released a hard drive with just a few incriminating emails and some pictures that could be harvested from any social media site it would be VERY obviously false. So if you're going to feed fake information to Rudy you do so in this manner. That doesn't make it false, but to date NOBODY has produced the original emails with header data intact so that some amount of authenticity can be verified. The fact that even editors and writers at the NY Post had reservations about this data and refused to have their names on the byline suggests this data is crap. I have acted as a witness in corporate cases that required me to attest to the authenticity of, among other things, emails. What amounts to a picture of an email that is clearly not in its original format is not evidence. It would be laughed out of court in the same manner a contract written in crayon would.
October 19, 20204 yr 3 minutes ago, Diehardfan said: We aren't arguing about that. You can fight it out with others over that one. My point is a drive exists, we have to wait about the content. People mocking it are silly to me the same as people dancing about what is on there. We don't know. A drive exists, but whether it belonged to Hunter is still in question, because this email hardly proves what you think it does. The request to check their records could simply be something along the lines of, "whose name and credit card was used to pay for this repair?" Which could simply be the attorney attempting to find a way to clear his client's name. If the shop can't produce records of payment, then it further casts doubt on the whole thing.
October 19, 20204 yr 5 minutes ago, Diehardfan said: Yeah, it collaborates what the store owner said happened on the phone. What records would the store owner have to review? If it was a stop immediately phone call there wouldn't be anything to check into. So you can post the rolling eyes emoji all you want. I think you mean "corroborates", and again it's stupid to begin with - the FBI has the hard drives. Not Guiliani, or the shop owner. The FBI has had the drives for almost a year.
October 19, 20204 yr Just now, JohnSnowsHair said: You realize that the way misinformation campaigns like this work is to mix in false information with a whole bunch of true information, giving the impression that everything is true? If they released a hard drive with just a few incriminating emails and some pictures that could be harvested from any social media site it would be VERY obviously false. So if you're going to feed fake information to Rudy you do so in this manner. That doesn't make it false, but to date NOBODY has produced the original emails with header data intact so that some amount of authenticity can be verified. The fact that even editors and writers at the NY Post had reservations about this data and refused to have their names on the byline suggests this data is crap. I have acted as a witness in corporate cases that required me to attest to the authenticity of, among other things, emails. What amounts to a picture of an email that is clearly not in its original format is not evidence. It would be laughed out of court in the same manner a contract written in crayon would. I'm in the wait and see camp. You are in the 100% false. We are going to find out down the line and either way I don't see this really swinging many voters. Liberals will cry Russia. Conservatives will talk about it constantly. I see why both would take those positions.
Create an account or sign in to comment