4 minutes ago, DEagle7 said:

I mean besides this whole thing being easily refutable nonsense, I thought private businesses were supposed to be able to regulate their business as they see fit?  Bakers can't be forced to make cakes for gay weddings but Twitter should allow you to spread whatever BS conspiracy theory you want on their platform? 

Who cares? I think Trump supporters are going to be pretty disappointed to find out how little this stuff registers now. Biden can stand in the middle of 5th avenue and shoot someone and I'm still voting for him.

10 minutes ago, Paul852 said:

Mad..... I'd stand in line for HOURS to vote for him.

With a large coke and a side of COVID!

2 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Bs CoNsPiRaCy ThEoRy

Honeybuns I already gave you several examples about why the premise of the story is nonsense and how the source of the story completely and utterly unreliable, including direct audio of his interview.  I know you like to troll but this is getting sad, even for you.  

3 minutes ago, The_Omega said:

So since lying about it before didn’t squash the stories, telling the same lies again is sure to do the trick.  Go with that.

They're still going

is crap real yet?

3 hours ago, we_gotta_believe said:

So you're just gonna play the hits? Fine. Can you at least figure out a way to work in Crooked Hillary while you're at it.

And pizza.  Once you've had conspiracy theory with pizza it's kinda hard to go back.

33 minutes ago, mr_hunt said:

is crap real yet?

Only if your name is...

 

 

 

 

THE BETA!!!!

And...bust. 
 

 

1 hour ago, vikas83 said:

And...bust. 
 

 

Oof.  First the unmasking case had no merit and now this.  It is almost like the republicans are untrustworthy.

 

7 hours ago, Dave Moss said:

Facebook and Twitter are going to be banned after Trump wins re-election.  Maybe this place too, who knows...

I blame Moss

6 hours ago, The_Omega said:

The same people who demanded that anonymously sourced stories about Trumps taxes, or him calling soldiers names, must be taken seriously, suddenly don’t believe this? Shocking. Clap for that you stupid ****.

Cry me a river and go vote to balance out one of Moss’ multiple votes. 

7 hours ago, Smokesdawg said:

oy, again the alleged "emails” aren’t even email file that can be reviewed for their metadata. The "emails” are a picture file. There is literally nothing about this that can verified. 

All files can have metadata

1 hour ago, DrPhilly said:

All files can have metadata

You mean they might be able to see my sacred boobs files?   ......................

 

Hi, Doc. 

1 hour ago, Cthulhu said:

You mean they might be able to see my sacred boobs files?   ......................

 

Hi, Doc. 

Well they can probably see when and maybe where the pic was taken. Good chance there is some info about the camera as well. 
 

Did you know that generally camera’s have their own equivalent to a fingerprint? So you can often tell if pics were taken by the same camera. 

8 hours ago, DEagle7 said:

I mean besides this whole thing being easily refutable nonsense, I thought private businesses were supposed to be able to regulate their business as they see fit?  Bakers can't be forced to make cakes for gay weddings but Twitter should allow you to spread whatever BS conspiracy theory you want on their platform? 

But weren’t they forced to bake a cake? 

4 hours ago, DrPhilly said:

All files can have metadata

A picture of the file has metadata regarding being a picture.

The metadata of a photograph says zero about what was being imaged, other than when and with what it was imaged.

27 minutes ago, Toastrel said:

A picture of the file has metadata regarding being a picture.

The metadata of a photograph says zero about what was being imaged, other than when and with what it was imaged.

Yes, thank you. That’s what I was trying to say.... poorly. 

Shapiro nails it here.

6 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Shapiro nails it here.

USA VP has no authority over Ukraine.

 

13 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Shapiro nails it here.

Based on reporting from a laptop somebody has held for a year and then just before the election it gets turned over to Giuliani.

Is the reporting accurate? Sadly for people like you, the AG, armed with instructions from the President was unable to prove anything at all unsavory.

 

Other than the AG performing a witch hunt for the president to influence the election.

Burisma is the current Benghazi. We've been through this over and over. Nothing is there, but Repugnants will keep beating the drum as long as somebody is listening. Yes, it appears there was conflict of interest when your dad is VP of a country, and you sit on a board of a company that is being investigated. It was looked at, and found no conflict. LINK

Quote

"It can’t be that because your dad is the vice president, you can’t do anything,” said Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.

So now tell me about the Trumps and all of their foreign business dealings. The President is actively involved in his own company while leading the country simultaneously. How is that no conflict?

8 hours ago, vikas83 said:

And...bust. 
 

 

     

At least come up with something actually newsworthy if you're gonna create fake emails 

literally the dumbest people on this planet

 

5 hours ago, DrPhilly said:

All files can have metadata

Correct, and technically these could've been second hand copies of the files instead of the originals, but if you're trying to prove something is real, you send the friggin originals so as to not cast doubt over your own story. So either they're fake  and these guys are incredibly stupid for making fake nothing berder emails (which is what I'm leaning towards) or these guys are so stupid they sent second hand copies and in the process made them look fake (still entirely possible, and still not moving the needle.)