Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

  • Replies 4.2k
  • Views 146.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

8 minutes ago, Paul852 said:

What is the story behind this exactly? I'm so confused.

Just a couple of perverts being perverts.

I really can't wait to watch this movie.

15 minutes ago, Green Dog said:

Verified?  Show me where they verified anything regarding ANY forms of files.

You clearly didn't understand when I told you this was SPYCRAFT 101.

I already did post it, within the last page. You ignored it then, you’ll ignore it now. This isn’t spycraft, it’s excusing and enabling corruption in a desperate attempt to win an election.

17 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

:roll:

No reason, except, you know the fact that she looks 15.

5f9050845de2c.image.thumb.jpg.dc8aaf0f6906f31c1ca683bae7dcb74b.jpg

acb07c1e-7b91-4949-b382-38878c466912-borat-subsequent-moviefilm-BLOODMOON_SG_00261_V2_rgb.jpg.43d45098f18171cee1d59c74fb4ee982.jpg

Guliani's an old man trying to F what appears to be a teenager.  Gross, dude.  You sound like a guy on Cops telling the police he thought the girl was 38 while he's led away in cuffs.

So you’ve got nothing. As usual. Meanwhile, Hunter and Joe’s scandal is getting deeper and deeper.

1 minute ago, The_Omega said:

So you’ve got nothing. As usual. Meanwhile, Hunter and Joe’s scandal is getting deeper and deeper.

Oh he's got plenty...

Screenshot_2020-10-20-A-New-QuickLink-Th Screenshot_2020-10-20-A-New-QuickLink-Th Screenshot_2020-10-20-A-New-QuickLink-Th Screenshot_2020-10-20-A-New-QuickLink-Th Screenshot_2020-10-21-A-New-QuickLink-Th

:lol: 

4 hours ago, Kz! said:

 

You mean, doesn't Trump's Justice Department have to address this?

 

That is how criminal proceedings work. Proof of a crime is given to Law Enforcement. They have to bring charges. There's this whole like. . . system . .. in place.

10 minutes ago, The_Omega said:

So you’ve got nothing. As usual. Meanwhile, Hunter and Joe’s scandal is getting deeper and deeper.

:lol:

Nothing?  I have eyes.  That girl looks like a freaking teenager.  If you want to defend Guiliani attempting to F a kid then have at it, but damn dude, have some self respect.

40 minutes ago, The_Omega said:

To paraphrase "the left", nobody is voting for Rudy. Are you all operating under the assumption that the actress was really 15?  That Rudy somehow thought that she was 15?  That this in anyway is supposed to deflect from Biden's worsening corruption scandal? 

You mean Biden's son's scandal, right? The one with the moving goal posts: Ukrainian skullduggery, or maybe pedophilia. Not sure. Gotta check the laptop the blind guy gave me.

2 minutes ago, The_Omega said:

I already did post it, within the last page. You ignored it then, you’ll ignore it now. This isn’t spycraft, it’s excusing and enabling corruption in a desperate attempt to win an election.

Um, nope.  You didn't. 

Files.  Emails. Actual evidence of misconduct or... LOL... illegal images, videos, etc.  IE, The CORE of this whole "scandal" that you think is real.  Show me where these things, not Laptops, have been verified.

We'll wait.

3 minutes ago, Toastrel said:

You mean Biden's son's scandal, right? The one with the moving goal posts: Ukrainian skullduggery, or maybe pedophilia. Not sure. Gotta check the laptop the blind guy gave me.

No, Biden's scandal, where he was using his son as the bagman.  Do try to keep up.  This is where we are, emails proving corruption by the Democrat Presidential candidate are pushed aside because an unmarried old man was covertly filmed trying to get some from an attractive adult woman.  And the people pretending that the old guy trying to get some is a bigger scandal than their candidates corruption actually believe themselves morally superior.  What a world.

4 minutes ago, The_Omega said:

No, Biden's scandal, where he was using his son as the bagman.  Do try to keep up.  This is where we are, emails proving corruption by the Democrat Presidential candidate are pushed aside because an unmarried old man was covertly filmed trying to get some from an attractive adult woman.  And the people pretending that the old guy trying to get some is a bigger scandal than their candidates corruption actually believe themselves morally superior.  What a world.

Oh right, I forgot where we live in a world where guilt is proved on Fox News before charges are filed.

8 minutes ago, The_Omega said:

No, Biden's scandal, where he was using his son as the bagman.  Do try to keep up.  This is where we are, emails proving corruption by the Democrat Presidential candidate are pushed aside because an unmarried old man was covertly filmed trying to get some from an attractive adult woman.  And the people pretending that the old guy trying to get some is a bigger scandal than their candidates corruption actually believe themselves morally superior.  What a world.

tumblr_inline_oob6xlOQ2H1tc2f3l_500.gif

26 minutes ago, Paul852 said:

What is the story behind this exactly? I'm so confused.

Is that actually Trump -- I think it may not be?  There is some look-a-like who goes to his rallies.  

Just now, caesar said:

Is that actually Trump -- I think it may not be?  There is some look-a-like who goes to his rallies.  

It was some comedy video Trump and Guiliani did like 10-15 years ago. It made the rounds during 2016 as well.

It's really not a big deal, but in contrast with the Borat 2 video it's pretty funny :roll: 

Ok, so let's reset.

If the FBI/CIA has determined that the contents of the laptop are NOT part of a Russian disinformation scheme, then the only thing that is proven is just that: that it's not part of a Russian disinformation scheme.

It does not prove that the contents of the drive/laptop are authentic. Its contents were not "verified". It does not prove that there was any wrongdoing.

People are just going to continue to believe what they want to believe. Trump supporters are going to embrace the whole thing as some big story that the evil liberal media is suppressing, and Biden supporters are going to laugh at trying to tie some mediocre corruption to Biden via his son when there is a mountain of corruption happening in the White House every day.

If it proves true that Biden was corrupt, then we impeach him. But this isn't moving the needle.

This really is the best scandal.

A laptop, acquired by Rudy Giuliani months ago - the guy they got it from has some 'splainin' to do and he has contradicted himself.

The blind PC repair guy who got three laptops in April of 2019 he says that were never picked up and paid for. He is concerned with crime? Not sure, turns it over to Rudy Giuliani months ago - not sure why him? Also the FBI, he says, although a computer repair person who goes through emails on a client's laptop is already violating all basic PC repair ethics.

And with the laptop and a copy of the hard drive, he offers a picture of an email. A photo of an email, the ONE WAY to guarantee you cannot prove an email's authenticity.

Clearly, this all must be true, It is logical.

34 minutes ago, Paul852 said:

What is the story behind this exactly? I'm so confused.

It was supposed to some joke filmed for a bunch of smarmy rich guys at a dinner 20-something years ago. It's pretty awkward. A couple of dudes acting gay and dressing in drag is supposed to be funny?

 

22 minutes ago, The_Omega said:

No, Biden's scandal, where he was using his son as the bagman.  Do try to keep up.  This is where we are, emails proving corruption by the Democrat Presidential candidate are pushed aside because an unmarried old man was covertly filmed trying to get some from an attractive adult woman.  And the people pretending that the old guy trying to get some is a bigger scandal than their candidates corruption actually believe themselves morally superior.  What a world.

WHERE?  What emails?  Show us these emails!

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.  No criminal activity has been proven, and no evidence has emerged that Joe Biden did anything to intentionally benefit his son.  Stop being a sheep.

4 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

Ok, so let's reset.

If the FBI/CIA has determined that the contents of the laptop are NOT part of a Russian disinformation scheme, then the only thing that is proven is just that: that it's not part of a Russian disinformation scheme.

It does not prove that the contents of the drive/laptop are authentic. Its contents were not "verified". It does not prove that there was any wrongdoing.

People are just going to continue to believe what they want to believe. Trump supporters are going to embrace the whole thing as some big story that the evil liberal media is suppressing, and Biden supporters are going to laugh at trying to tie some mediocre corruption to Biden via his son when there is a mountain of corruption happening in the White House every day.

If it proves true that Biden was corrupt, then we impeach him. But this isn't moving the needle.

Actually, if elected, it wouldn't be a cause for impeachment if true.  I think it would have to be something he did as President.

25 minutes ago, The_Omega said:

No, Biden's scandal, where he was using his son as the bagman.  Do try to keep up.  This is where we are, emails proving corruption by the Democrat Presidential candidate are pushed aside because an unmarried old man was covertly filmed trying to get some from an attractive adult woman.  And the people pretending that the old guy trying to get some is a bigger scandal than their candidates corruption actually believe themselves morally superior.  What a world.

i see you're still cucking for daddy. 

56 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

 :roll: nails it

Yep... spiderman really hits the nail on the head.

3 minutes ago, caesar said:

Actually, if elected, it wouldn't be a cause for impeachment if true.  I think it would have to be something he did as President.

There are no distinctions made about when a crime has to be committed for impeachment to be used as a remedy to remove a president. 

1 minute ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

There are no distinctions made about when a crime has to be committed for impeachment to be used as a remedy to remove a president. 

Nancy waited patiently until he did something while president but you are correct, there is no requirement in the law.  But... the house isn't moving off dem any time soon so i wouldn't expect any impeachment unless you saw joe snorting some crack.  

3 minutes ago, Smokesdawg said:

Yep... spiderman really hits the nail on the head.

You have to be one miserable person with no sense of humor to not laugh at that. You must be fun at parties hahahahaha

Create an account or sign in to comment