October 28, 20204 yr 30 minutes ago, Toty said: I just wanted throw a hypothetical but plausible scenario out there for you folks to chew on (not taking sides, I have no targ in this hunt). Let's say that there is something to this story AND that the media is doing their best to keep a lid on the worst parts of it until after the election. Then let's say that the facts and rumors as they stand aren't enough to move the electoral needle and Biden goes on to win. Afterward, previously "suppressed" facts make their way to the surface and an investigation ensues. Biden is forced to resign and um, good morning Madame President. To quote Happy Gilmore, "Talk about your all time backfires."
October 28, 20204 yr 15 minutes ago, The_Omega said: Democrats then: No man is above the law and anonymous sources and claims without supporting documentation are good enough for impeachment. Democrats now: Ignore these claims against Joe Biden, and emails, texts, recordings, and witness statements are not evidence. Neither anonymous, nor lacking supporting documentation: As a reminder, Vindman testified in front of congress under oath, meanwhile Tony Bubbles over there went on Tucker Carlson's show which Fox News argued in court that no reasonable viewer takes seriously. Yeah the situations are totally the same, Sarah.
October 28, 20204 yr When you go crazy about a question like this it typically means you know the jig is up (in Fox interview no less). You hate to see it.... https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/giuliani-gets-irate-after-fox-newss-kennedy-questions-his-hunter-biden-allegations-you-better-apologize-070119082.html
October 28, 20204 yr 3 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: Neither anonymous, nor lacking supporting documentation: As a reminder, Vindman testified in front of congress under oath, meanwhile Tony Bubbles over there went on Tucker Carlson's show which Fox News argued in court that no reasonable viewer takes seriously. Yeah the situations are totally the same, Sarah. I've been reading Zuker's posts for over 16 years. In that time I haven't quite pinpointed whether he is extremely dimwitted, a stark raving lunatic, or a combination there of. He will believe anything put out by Fox News, and wouldn't believe in gravity if he thought it somehow benefitted democrats.
October 28, 20204 yr 4 minutes ago, barho said: When you go crazy about a question like this it typically means you know the jig is up (in Fox interview no less). You hate to see it.... https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/giuliani-gets-irate-after-fox-newss-kennedy-questions-his-hunter-biden-allegations-you-better-apologize-070119082.html Then you can come to my office and apologize to me! ...while I lay down on my bed and repeatedly "tuck in my shirt."
October 28, 20204 yr 2 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: Then you can come to my office and apologize to me! ...while I lay down on my bed and repeatedly "tuck in my shirt." She should have turned right around and shouted "no thank you!"
October 28, 20204 yr 5 minutes ago, Kz! said: Ya hate to see it. hmmm...this was last night. you'd think the "proof" would be all over the news this morning....but....nothing.
October 28, 20204 yr The jacka** is outdated (although still accurate), here's the new symbol of the Democrat party
October 28, 20204 yr 18 minutes ago, The_Omega said: The jacka** is outdated (although still accurate), here's the new symbol of the Democrat party It's like you people have no self-awareness. How can you be so blissfully ignorant?
October 28, 20204 yr 57 minutes ago, Kz! said: Are you still salty about your faceplant in the conservative thread. It'll be OK, man. you're a man who knows about MB faceplants better than any other so im sure you'll give him some pointers on how to recover. 22 minutes ago, The_Omega said: The jacka** is outdated (although still accurate), here's the new symbol of the Democrat party where are the tapes meg ?
October 28, 20204 yr 1 hour ago, Kz! said: Are you still salty about your faceplant in the conservative thread. It'll be OK, man. I understand that you still think Tucker is news. You don't believe the court documents and you are all out of cool ranch doritos so you're just squirting ranch dressing down your gullet.
October 28, 20204 yr Author Just now, Toastrel said: I understand that you still think Tucker is news. You don't believe the court documents and you are all out of cool ranch doritos so you're just squirting ranch dressing down your gullet. lmao, what?
October 28, 20204 yr 2 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: This Tucker Carlson interview is gonna end Sleepy Joe for sure! i've been googling "how to change my vote" all morning!
October 28, 20204 yr Wow, so even Fox and OAN are shying away from this dumpster: "The Wall Street Journal and Fox News have both reported finding no evidence that former Vice President Joe Biden benefited from the Hunter Biden business dealings that have drawn scrutiny. More explicitly pro-Trump media outlets — OAN, Breitbart, Newsmax — have mostly shied away from publishing fresher, more salacious allegations. And conservative talking heads — pundits, politicians and loud MAGA Twitter personalities alike — have been more focused on the meta narrative around the laptop, arguing that mainstream media, social media companies and the deep state are conspiring to prevent President Donald Trump’s reelection by suppressing the story." https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/28/trump-conspiracy-theoryhunter-biden-433131
Create an account or sign in to comment