March 22, 20223 yr 12 minutes ago, mayanh8 said: The Bilderbergs, dude. The F'ing Bilderbergs. I seen Build-A-Bear in the mall. Where is Build-A-Burger? I might like that better. The former was a ripoff.
March 22, 20223 yr Author 2 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: Based on a stolen, forged diary. But good job white knighting for a dude who went on a sanctimonious, conspiracy-addled rant about....the guy he plans on voting for and fully supports Nope, that diary has been verified as has hunter's laptop which also contained pictures of a naked kid on it. So, the president's son is a confirmed pedo as well.
March 22, 20223 yr 7 minutes ago, Kz! said: The dude you are going to vote for showered with his young daughter and has been caught fondling children on camera numerous times.
March 22, 20223 yr 1 minute ago, Kz! said: Nope, that diary has been verified as has hunter's laptop which also contained pictures of a naked kid on it. So, the president's son is a confirmed pedo as well. "Verified" by the guys who stole it
March 22, 20223 yr Of Course Ashley Biden’s Diary Was "Passed Around” a Trump Fundraiser, a.k.a. A Gathering of Horrible People https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/03/ashley-biden-elizabeth-fago-project-veritas These are the people you are dealing with. The sort that would do this.
March 22, 20223 yr Author I love how you retards can come into this thread, freak out with rolling emojis about the laptop at the beginning of the thread, be proven definitively wrong, then come in with more "there's no way it's real" takes in the very same thread. It's actually kind of hilarious.
March 22, 20223 yr 1 hour ago, Kz! said: I love how you retards can come into this thread, freak out with rolling emojis about the laptop at the beginning of the thread, be proven definitively wrong, then come in with more "there's no way it's real" takes in the very same thread. It's actually kind of hilarious. Let's be honest here... I could spend hours in this thread laying out the facts and argument for what is and isn't real when it comes to the Hunter Biden laptop story. I could even back all that up with my decades of experience in the technology field, case studies on this very topic within the Infragard/FBI community to which I've been party to, and the various issues raised by the chain of custody of the laptop which all end up at the oft mentioned fruit of the poisonous tree metaphor. But you'd simply do the same thing you ALWAYS do, which is: 1. Look stupid. 2. Ignore people who present salient arguments. 3. Disappear for a few hours and then pretend like the conversation never happened. 4. Start regurgitating the same copped content you always post. I don't have the strength to drag you. And in the end it would just be hours wasted. Given that, the rollies are the most accurate representation of an authentic reaction I can muster.
March 22, 20223 yr 9 minutes ago, mayanh8 said: Let's be honest here... I could spend hours in this thread laying out the facts and argument for what is and isn't real when it comes to the Hunter Biden laptop story. I could even back all that up with my decades of experience in the technology field, case studies on this very topic within the Infragard/FBI community to which I've been party to, and the various issues raised by the chain of custody of the laptop which all end up at the oft mentioned fruit of the poisonous tree metaphor. But you'd simply do the same thing you ALWAYS do, which is: 1. Look stupid. 2. Ignore people who present salient arguments. 3. Disappear for a few hours and then pretend like the conversation never happened. 4. Start regurgitating the same copped content you always post. I don't have the strength to drag you. And in the end it would just be hours wasted. Given that, the rollies are the most accurate representation of an authentic reaction I can muster. Did you use your FBI expertise in the Rittenhouse thread?
March 22, 20223 yr 11 minutes ago, mikemack8 said: Did you use your FBI expertise in the Rittenhouse thread? I'm not a law enforcement expert. To anyone with an IQ above 70 that would have been apparent. But I'm happy to provide that bit of clarity for those who don't quite make the cut.
March 22, 20223 yr Author 8 minutes ago, mayanh8 said: Let's be honest here... I could spend hours in this thread laying out the facts and argument for what is and isn't real when it comes to the Hunter Biden laptop story. I could even back all that up with my decades of experience in the technology field, case studies on this very topic within the Infragard/FBI community to which I've been party to, and the various issues raised by the chain of custody of the laptop which all end up at the oft mentioned fruit of the poisonous tree metaphor. But you'd simply do the same thing you ALWAYS do, which is: 1. Look stupid. 2. Ignore people who present salient arguments. 3. Disappear for a few hours and then pretend like the conversation never happened. 4. Start regurgitating the same copped content you always post. I don't have the strength to drag you. And in the end it would just be hours wasted. Given that, the rollies are the most accurate representation of an authentic reaction I can muster. Yes, despite the laptop being verified by multiple different sources with direct knowledge of it, you, personally, can use your decades of experience to discredit the entire story! Quick, mayanh8, call the New York Times up and let them know that they've made a huge mistake by confirming the NY Post's story.
March 22, 20223 yr 3 minutes ago, Kz! said: Yes, despite the laptop being verified by multiple different sources with direct knowledge of it, you, personally, can use your decades of experience to discredit the entire story! Quick, mayanh8, call the New York Times up and let them know that they've made a huge mistake by confirming the NY Post's story. That right there proves you have zero understanding of the topic you're speaking on. You don't even know what that simple, four word statement actually means.
March 22, 20223 yr Author 1 minute ago, mayanh8 said: That right there proves you have zero understanding of the topic you're speaking on. You don't even know what that simple, five word statement actually means. Take it up with the NY Times, *****.
March 22, 20223 yr Author I mean, this stuff is all detailed in the NY Times article on the subject. It's really absurd and hilarious when you think about it. Moron with a cat avatar bizarrely thinks he knows more about the laptop than the federal prosecutors investigating the case? Like, wtf.
March 22, 20223 yr 7 minutes ago, Kz! said: Take it up with the NY Times, *****. In case it wasn't apparent...
March 22, 20223 yr Author Just thoroughly bizarre. So I'm assuming the argument is now that because the laptop changed hands, nothing on it can be verified? Is that what we're going with? So the federal prosecutors that verified to the NYT that the emails in question were real are just... wrong? This is one of the strangest arguments I've seen in here. Truly remarkable.
March 22, 20223 yr Left- my guyzz are innocentzzzz Right- my guyzz are innocentzzz Everyone to everyone else
March 22, 20223 yr Who claims Hunter is innocent? He's a scumbag, nobody doubts that. There was supposed to be a bombshell in here. Apparently the illegal copy made by the PC repair fellow, was lost by Tucker in the mail. Did somebody find it?
March 22, 20223 yr Author 1 minute ago, Toastrel said: Who claims Hunter is innocent? He's a scumbag, nobody doubts that. There was supposed to be a bombshell in here. Apparently the illegal copy made by the PC repair fellow, was lost by Tucker in the mail. Did somebody find it? No, emails implicating Hunter and potentially Joe have been profiting off of Joe's political power have been authenticated by the NYT. But I guess the bizarre Tucker reference is what's important.
March 22, 20223 yr WW3 is squarely on the shoulders of Hunter Biden and his laptop. Franz Ferdinand eat your heart out.
March 22, 20223 yr 9 minutes ago, Kz! said: No, emails implicating Hunter and potentially Joe have been profiting off of Joe's political power have been authenticated by the NYT. But I guess the bizarre Tucker reference is what's important. There's absolutely no proof of that in your "bombshell". Meanwhile.... Trump made more than $200 million from foreign business interests since 2016 Quote Trump earned more than $200 million in income from his interests in foreign countries since 2016 and reported nearly $95 million of that income from foreign business dealings in his two most recent financial disclosures on file with the U.S. Office of Government Ethics, according to OpenSecrets analysis of data from personal financial disclosures.
Create an account or sign in to comment