28 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

I meant for Biden Derangement Syndrome, not covid. The next life you save could be your own.

appears me and bout 67% of Americans fall into that category since his approval rating is only 33%.. so anything you say slick

22 minutes ago, Toty said:

It seems the progress we've made in the decades since that photo was taken is astounding; namely the expulsion of three extraneous letters from the the word donut.

For this, I credit one Albert Horan - the greatest bailiff in the history of jurisprudence (no offense, Rusty).

I still spell it "doughnut," cuz I'm that guy.

Just got back from the grocery store. I gotta be honest, I dont think I've ever seen so much chicken in one place! Bought a few dozen wings to cook for Sundays game.

19 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

Just got back from the grocery store. I gotta be honest, I dont think I've ever seen so much chicken in one place! Bought a few dozen wings to cook for Sundays game.

 

2 minutes ago, MidMoFo said:

 

We did it bud. And no one can ever take it away from us.

24 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

Just got back from the grocery store. I gotta be honest, I dont think I've ever seen so much chicken in one place! Bought a few dozen wings to cook for Sundays game.

We need photo proof otherwise I don't believe it. 

Just now, DEagle7 said:

We need photo proof otherwise I don't believe it. 

Does it have to be a photo I actually took, or can I just download a picture of really full meat cases?

1 minute ago, Boogyman said:

Does it have to be a photo I actually took, or can I just download a picture of really full meat cases?

Saw this brave soul in town this morning refusing to comply with Biden's mask mandates

🙏

1 hour ago, Ipiggles said:

appears me and bout 67% of Americans fall into that category since his approval rating is only 33%.. so anything you say slick

Make sure to get regular boosters for it as well. 

 

3 hours ago, Ipiggles said:

 

I'm sure this number is totally legitimate.............

spoiler: it's not. we actually don't have any idea how many illegal immigrants come in, because ... they come in illegally. the 2M number is actually how many contacts border patrol made with undocumented immigrants, most of which were turned back. in fact the unique number of individuals is 1.15 million, because so many turned back try again.

That's not to say that we don't have a problem at our southern border. We absolutely do. But the above is another example of stupidity through misinformation. And those who continue to share BS unverified and ultimately inaccurate information do so willfully, purposely painting an inaccurate picture of the world to fit their political agenda.

3 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

I'm sure this number is totally legitimate.............

spoiler: it's not. we actually don't have any idea how many illegal immigrants come in, because ... they come in illegally. the 2M number is actually how many contacts border patrol made with undocumented immigrants, most of which were turned back. in fact the unique number of individuals is 1.15 million, because so many turned back try again.

That's not to say that we don't have a problem at our southern border. We absolutely do. But the above is another example of stupidity through misinformation. And those who continue to share BS unverified and ultimately inaccurate information do so willfully, purposely painting an inaccurate picture of the world to fit their political agenda.

Do you feel that current policy entices more to try?

39 minutes ago, Ipiggles said:

 

The Supreme Court already stopped Trump from being a dictator

Quote

The U.S. Supreme Court late Friday officially put to rest a brazen eleventh-hour attempt by the state of Texas and Republican allies of President Donald Trump to throw out millions of votes in four states and overturn Democrat Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 presidential election.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/supreme-court-denies-texas-challenge-overturn-2020-election/story?id=74680935

 

i wonder if president joe uses shampoo and conditioner on his leg hair.     

1 minute ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Gross.

 

More importantly what does he use on Ashley's legs?  

keep your hands above your desk please. 

7 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Gross.

 

More importantly what does he use on Ashley's legs?  

is that his daughter's name?  is she the one who was dancing all sexxy at his victory speech?    

i don't know enough about biden's family...f'n hunter stole all the attn from the rest of them....and for some reason joe hasn't given any of them cabinet positions yet. 

The good news for Biden is things can't get much worse.....probably

41 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Just think for a second and realize who you're asking.....

 

 

You should read her diary about ........ what she was doing while she was listening to Mr. and Mrs. POP POP bump uglies......She def. has daddy issues.  Standing face to face with your dads--------  in the shower as a little girl might do that to you.  

 

a weirdo...i asked a weirdo.     

 

35 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

"Was I molested...."

"@ a young age showers with my dad (probably not appropriate)....."

 

THAT Ashley Biden.....

 

 

you should get that BDS treated, brah!     

55 minutes ago, mr_hunt said:

i don't know enough about biden's family...f'n hunter stole all the attn from the rest of them....and for some reason joe hasn't given any of them cabinet positions yet. 

Seriously, what a cuck. Real men install their kids in roles they have no business being in and override security protocols so their sons-in-law can improve business relations with Saudi kings known for hacking journalists to death.

1 hour ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Where does one acquire a "Build Back Better" hat?  Asking for a friend.  

amount of political merch owned definitely says a lot about a person's...umm....enthusiasm....just not in the way you guys think.   

 

Quote

 

About That Speech …

As his presidency spirals downward, Joe Biden lashes out.

Jonah Goldberg

Jan 12

Hey,

I’m going to try to not lose my temper, but I make no promises.

This is from Joe Biden’s inaugural address, which is eight days shy of exactly a year ago.

We can join forces, stop the shouting and lower the temperature. For without unity there is no peace, only bitterness and fury. No progress, only exhausting outrage. No nation, only a state of chaos. This is our historic moment of crisis and challenge, and unity is the path forward. And we must meet this moment as the United States of America. If we do that, I guarantee you we will not fail. We have never ever, ever, failed in America when we’ve acted together.

This is from his speech in Georgia yesterday:

So, I ask every elected official in America: How do you want to be remembered? At consequential moments in history, they present a choice: Do you want to be on the side of Dr. King or George Wallace?  Do you want to be on the side of John Lewis or Bull Connor?  Do you want to be on the side of Abraham Lincoln or Jefferson Davis?

So, what changed? To listen to Biden, Kamala Harris, Chuck Schumer, most Democrats, and a whole bunch of journalists, what changed was an existential threat to democracy. "Voter suppression” is a plague sweeping across the land that literally threatens to end democracy in America. Biden & Co. base this grave appraisal on three distinct claims.

The first is that there has been an epidemic of laws "making it harder to vote.”

The second is that Georgia is at the bleeding edge of this effort with voter suppression laws so heinous that they, by themselves, represent "Jim Crow 2.0.”

Last is that Trump loyalists are in the process of rigging the 2024 presidential election by preparing an end run on legitimate vote counts.

So, here’s my grading of these claims: The first is very, very weak. The second is shameful, demagogic, ahistorical garbage. The third is incomplete.

Restricting the right to vote.

So let’s start with the first claim. It comes almost entirely from an accounting by the Brennan Center for Justice.

As Joe Biden said yesterday, "Last year alone, 19 states not [only] proposed but enacted 34 laws attacking voting rights.”

Here’s how the Brennan Center put it October:

In all but seven states, regular legislative sessions are now over. Between January 1 and September 27, at least 19 states enacted 33 laws that make it harder for Americans to vote. At the same time, lawmakers in many states responded to Americans’ eagerness to vote by making it easier for eligible voters to cast their ballots. Between January 1 and September 27, at least 25 states enacted 62 laws with provisions that expand voting access.

I don’t know which state got in a restrictive law to bump up the tally to 34, but it doesn’t matter. As you can see, nearly twice as many laws enacted expanded voting as restricted it.

Now, the Brennan folks make a perfectly fine point that not all voting rights laws are equal. If, for example, a state banned absentee voting—which hasn’t happened—that wouldn’t cancel out a state expanding absentee voting by another week.

But here’s the first problem. Many of these laws essentially repealed the changes made to account for the pandemic. A reasonable person can argue that they should all be made permanent, I suppose. But a reasonable person cannot plausibly argue that returning our voting practices to those in effect in 2018—when Democrats had sweeping victories—is proof that democracy is on the cusp of being eliminated and that anyone who supports the status quo ante of 2018 is taking the side of Jefferson Davis and Bull Connor. (Heck, voter laws were much more restrictive across the country a decade earlier, according to the criteria pushed by Democrats. Does that mean Barack Obama was elected our first black president in a Jim Crow country? Big, if true.)

Now, some laws went further than that, and I am entirely open to arguments that some of those changes were ill-advised. Heck, I agree that some were ill-advised and unnecessary. But none of these changes amount to "Jim Crow 2.0.” One reason I know this is because nobody—including Joe Biden—has been able to point to a single example of a law that comes within miles of Jim Crow restrictions. If they had such an example, you can be sure they wouldn’t be keeping it secret.

Consider voter ID laws, which are constantly cited as part of this racist, undemocratic tsunami. Tightening voter ID laws may or may not be a good idea. Personally, I think they’re fine in principle. But let’s concede that they’re bad. You know who else thinks they’re fine? A very large majority of Americans, including a majority of black Americans. A Monmouth poll this year found that 80 percent of Americans support voter ID requirements and only 18 percent oppose them. That’s not a new finding. In 2016, Gallup also found that 4 in 5 Americans support voter ID requirements, including 77 percent of nonwhite voters.

Again, are the majority of Americans siding with Jefferson Davis? Really?

And just to be clear, not all of the laws expanding the "right to vote” are good. Democrats have been pushing to make ballot harvesting (allowing individuals to collect ballots from others and drop them off at polling locations or early-voting drop boxes) easier. I think that’s wrong. If you disagree with me, that’s fine. But if you think that makes me a racist, my response is, "Go to Hell.”

Georgia, out of their minds.

More on that in a moment. Let’s move on to Georgia, which, we are told over and over again, is slipping back into Jim Crow because of an election law, SB 202, passed in March. The next day Biden called the law "un-American” and "Jim Crow 2.0.” Again, I don’t think the law was necessary and there are parts of it that I think are bad, but there are also parts of it that are good. Or, more to the point, good from the perspective of making it easier to vote. It expanded early voting to 17 days, including two Saturdays. It did tighten the window to get an absentee ballot in the first place to … 67 days prior to the election. The horror.

A lot has been made of the law’s "ban” on bringing food and water to people waiting in line to vote. But it does allow for polling places to provide water and says this restriction applies only: “(1) Within 150 feet of the outer edge of any building within which a polling place is established; (2) Within any polling place; or (3) Within 25 feet of any voter standing in line to vote at any polling place.” More horror.

By the way, the average wait time to vote in 2020 was less than three minutes.

Again, reasonable people can disagree about all of these provisions. But Biden is trying to bully reasonable people, especially reasonable Democratic senators, with accusations of racism. That’s grotesque.  

Jim, what now?

Let’s pause to talk about Jim Crow for a moment. When assessing the very real evils of Jim Crow, restrictions on voting are pretty low on the list. I’m not saying they weren’t evil, but the root of their evil was that they were a means to an end to secure far greater evils—like the ability to beat or lynch blacks, often with impunity. Jim Crow impoverished generations of blacks by preventing them from participating in the economy, traveling, or utilizing their constitutional and God-given rights. Jim Crow was a form of apartheid.

 

 

i admit it, i laughed at the herbert hat. am i going to hell ?