June 12, 20232 yr 8 minutes ago, DrPhilly said: They had a shot in 2016 and then again in the impeachment proceedings after the election and they failed on both accounts. They honestly have a new shot every few months and they fail every time. They could've abandoned him last fall when he embarrassed them in the midterms (this was probably the most likely time), then they could have again in April with the NY indictments, then again last week with the Federal indictments. They'll get another shot in a month or so when the GA indictments come down but of course they won't do it then either. They're going down with the ship. They're literally going to stand by his side while he campaigns from prison.
June 12, 20232 yr 1 hour ago, VanHammersly said: They honestly have a new shot every few months and they fail every time. They could've abandoned him last fall when he embarrassed them in the midterms (this was probably the most likely time), then they could have again in April with the NY indictments, then again last week with the Federal indictments. They'll get another shot in a month or so when the GA indictments come down but of course they won't do it then either. They're going down with the ship. They're literally going to stand by his side while he campaigns from prison. Which brings me to this gem (which is funny cause he's out there still lying for trump)
June 12, 20232 yr 1 minute ago, Tweek said: Which brings me to this gem (which is funny cause he's out there still lying for trump)
June 12, 20232 yr Author 1 hour ago, Toastrel said: which is stupid because between Ken Starr and "OMG Benghazi!!" Hillary is one of the most scrutinized politicians in US history. saying "nothing happened to her" is ridiculous.
June 12, 20232 yr 33 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: which is stupid because between Ken Starr and "OMG Benghazi!!" Hillary is one of the most scrutinized politicians in US history. saying "nothing happened to her" is ridiculous. didnt trump have his DOJ investigating her until he left office ?
June 12, 20232 yr 37 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: which is stupid because between Ken Starr and "OMG Benghazi!!" Hillary is one of the most scrutinized politicians in US history. saying "nothing happened to her" is ridiculous. It's even stupider because the FBI did investigate, did conclude she acted recklessly, but did not think they could prove criminal intent. Being stupid and careless may technically be a crime, but no chance a prosecutor brings a case without being able to prove intent. Trump, on the other hand, obviously acted with criminal intent in his attempts to thwart the government from getting the documents back. Graham is a lawyer. He knows better. But he is simply trying to confuse the public in order to further his orange master's agenda. It's pathetic.
June 12, 20232 yr 4 hours ago, VanHammersly said: They honestly have a new shot every few months and they fail every time. They could've abandoned him last fall when he embarrassed them in the midterms (this was probably the most likely time), then they could have again in April with the NY indictments, then again last week with the Federal indictments. They'll get another shot in a month or so when the GA indictments come down but of course they won't do it then either. They're going down with the ship. They're literally going to stand by his side while he campaigns from prison. Yep. The best shot in my opinion was Jan 2021. It was essentially a layup. It is far more difficult now.
June 12, 20232 yr 1 minute ago, DrPhilly said: Yep. The best shot in my opinion was Jan 2021. It was essentially a layup. It is far more difficult now. I think it was probably in the fall. The Republican base doesn't give a sheet about the country but they do care about losing. And they know Trump dragged the party down. What's amazing to me is that they know he keeps losing and they know he'll lose again but they really don't seem to care anymore. It's truly just a case of "Dems hate Trump so I have to love him even if it means we hand Biden another term". I've never seen anything like it.
June 12, 20232 yr 2 hours ago, vikas83 said: It's even stupider because the FBI did investigate, did conclude she acted recklessly, but did not think they could prove criminal intent. Being stupid and careless may technically be a crime, but no chance a prosecutor brings a case without being able to prove intent. Trump, on the other hand, obviously acted with criminal intent in his attempts to thwart the government from getting the documents back. Graham is a lawyer. He knows better. But he is simply trying to confuse the public in order to further his orange master's agenda. It's pathetic. Yeah I always smash ish with a hammer when I dont need it, no criminal intent. Bleach bit....no criminal intent. Oh I forgot the quotation marks...."no criminal intent" Just stop. This is obvious phony baloney kangaroo court ish. Its not that they couldn't prove anything, they didnt want to.
June 13, 20232 yr Not all are MAGA. GOP senator censured by his state party Over the weekend, Republican delegates in North Carolina voted at their annual convention to censure Thom Tillis, the state’s senior U.S. senator, for backing LGBTQ+ rights, immigration and gun violence policies. As Sen. Tillis has gained influence in Congress for his willingness to work across the aisle, his record of supporting some key policies has raised concerns among some state Republicans that the senator has strayed from conservative values. Several delegates in Greensboro criticized Tillis, who has held his seat in the Senate since 2015, for his work last year on the Respect For Marriage Act, which enshrined protections for same-sex and interracial marriages in federal law. Both the state and national GOP platforms oppose same-sex marriage. But Tillis, who had opposed it earlier in his political career, was among the early supporters of the law who lobbied his GOP colleagues in Congress to vote in favor of it. Wire reports
June 13, 20232 yr 13 hours ago, Mike31mt said: Yeah I always smash ish with a hammer when I dont need it, no criminal intent. Bleach bit....no criminal intent. Oh I forgot the quotation marks...."no criminal intent" Just stop. This is obvious phony baloney kangaroo court ish. Its not that they couldn't prove anything, they didnt want to. Wonder why all the plumbing got clogged with paper and phones and the secret service server "accidentally" got destroyed after he lost the election two years ago.
June 13, 20232 yr 26 minutes ago, DaEagles4Life said: Wonder why all the plumbing got clogged with paper and phones and the secret service server "accidentally" got destroyed after he lost the election two years ago. The same reason Hillary was purposefully destroying servers with hammers and using software to erase data. Right?
June 13, 20232 yr 8 minutes ago, Mike31mt said: The same reason Hillary was purposefully destroying servers with hammers and using software to erase data. Right?
June 13, 20232 yr 13 minutes ago, Mike31mt said: The same reason Hillary was purposefully destroying servers with hammers and using software to erase data. Right? Lock them both up
June 13, 20232 yr 18 hours ago, VanHammersly said: I think it was probably in the fall. The Republican base doesn't give a sheet about the country but they do care about losing. And they know Trump dragged the party down. What's amazing to me is that they know he keeps losing and they know he'll lose again but they really don't seem to care anymore. It's truly just a case of "Dems hate Trump so I have to love him even if it means we hand Biden another term". I've never seen anything like it. I don’t think enough of them blamed Trump about the Senate and state elections to make a difference but maybe I’m wrong
June 13, 20232 yr Author 14 minutes ago, toolg said: The real work doesn't make headlines. I'd buy that guy a beer
June 13, 20232 yr 5 hours ago, we_gotta_believe said: So you guys all now agree, that this has been done over and over and yet the only one indicted is Trump. Thanks
June 13, 20232 yr Just now, Mike31mt said: So you guys all now agree, that this has been done over and over and yet the only one indicted is Trump. Thanks If you stopped to wipe the tears from your eyes, you'd recognize that it's a meme, dude. It's already been explained to you why the two situations are different and how the severity of crimes differ, but being that you're from the dumbest state in the country, it's not surprising why you continue to be perplexed at why Trump was indicted but not Hillary.
June 13, 20232 yr 7 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: If you stopped to wipe the tears from your eyes, you'd recognize that it's a meme, dude. It's already been explained to you why the two situations are different and how the severity of crimes differ, but being that you're from the dumbest state in the country, it's not surprising why you continue to be perplexed at why Trump was indicted but not Hillary. There was an attempt to explain how theyre different. The attempt failed basic logic, and that's where this exchange started with my response to vikas. Maybe you should move to WV and enroll in kindergarten. It would be a massive step up in your education and ability to comprehend what youre trying to read.
June 13, 20232 yr 10 minutes ago, Mike31mt said: So you guys all now agree, that this has been done over and over and yet the only one indicted is Trump. Thanks
June 13, 20232 yr 32 minutes ago, Mike31mt said: So you guys all now agree, that this has been done over and over and yet the only one indicted is Trump. Thanks The Trump administration was too incompetent to accomplish the Ish he repeated over and over again like getting Mexico to pay for a wall and locking Hillary up. I couldn’t care less if she were indicted
June 13, 20232 yr Let’s face it, Dark Brandon is just a more gangsta president than the great pumpkin. He didn’t have to hold giant rallies with chants of lock him up. Dude ran from his basement, won, and is getting trump arrested like a boss
Create an account or sign in to comment