June 5, 20241 yr Just now, DrPhilly said: Isn’t that her exact point? She’s asking for some clarity for private individuals. Her example may be ridiculous I grant you. https://www.atf.gov/firearms/docs/undefined/atfpublication53102pdf/download Quote Federal law does not establish a "bright line” rule for when a federal firearms license is required for a dealer in firearms. In the federal statute, there is no specific threshold number or frequency of sales, quantity of firearms, or amount of profit or time invested that triggers the licensure requirement. Determining whether you are engaged in the business of dealing in firearms requires looking at the specific facts and circumstances of your activities.
June 5, 20241 yr I listen to English with accents and broken accents all the time so maybe that isn’t an issue for me.
June 5, 20241 yr 3 minutes ago, DrPhilly said: I listen to English with accents and broken accents all the time so maybe that isn’t an issue for me.
June 5, 20241 yr 6 minutes ago, toolg said: https://www.atf.gov/firearms/docs/undefined/atfpublication53102pdf/download Exactly, she’s making the point that the policy is too ambiguous. One may not think that’s a problem but there shouldn’t be any issue in understanding her. She was clear.
June 5, 20241 yr 6 minutes ago, DrPhilly said: I listen to English with accents and broken accents all the time so maybe that isn’t an issue for me. so, this is why you are far more fluent in hamoss.
June 5, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, mr_hunt said: Funny, the one group without the big accents are the Swedes.
June 5, 20241 yr Just now, Alpha_TATEr said: so, this is why you are far more fluent in hamoss. No, that’s because I took the time to learn about all that woke crap.
June 5, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, DrPhilly said: Exactly, she’s making the point that the policy is too ambiguous. One may not think that’s a problem but there shouldn’t be any issue in understanding her. She was clear. It is not ambiguous There is 100+ pages in the Final Rule detailing what activities a firearms dealer does. Either you are or you are not. Ignorance doesn't get you around the law.
June 5, 20241 yr 25 minutes ago, mr_hunt said: That's about what Haley got. 23% of Republicans won't vote for Trump. That's a death blow, Jean.
June 5, 20241 yr 4 hours ago, toolg said: Yesterday, MTG put forth a motion to defund our military overseas. Here they are, the Russian-compromised caucus. And look at who was just put on the House Intelligence committee.
June 5, 20241 yr 3 minutes ago, toolg said: And look at who was just put on the House Intelligence committee. Quote Perry participated in attempts to overturn the 2020 United States presidential election. Perry attempted to replace Pennsylvania's electors.The House committee investigating the January 6 Capitol attack called for an interview with Perry, the first time it publicly sought to question a sitting member of Congress. Perry declined the request the next day. The panel's chairperson said it had evidence from several witnesses that Perry had "an important role" in efforts to install Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Clark as acting attorney general as part of attempts to overturn the 2020 United States presidential election.[8] According to the committee, Perry introduced President Donald Trump to environmental lawyer Jeffrey Clark. The committee subpoenaed Perry on May 12, 2022, and Perry declined to participate, citing legal authority. After the November 2022 elections, the committee referred Perry to the House Ethics Panel for refusing their subpoena; it is unclear whether the panel will support any action.
June 5, 20241 yr 4 hours ago, toolg said: It is not ambiguous There is 100+ pages in the Final Rule detailing what activities a firearms dealer does. Either you are or you are not. Ignorance doesn't get you around the law. Should have a very simple answer then.
June 5, 20241 yr The first step to removing our right to vote. The Kansas Supreme Court has ruled that voting is not a fundamental right. What's next for voters? A split Kansas Supreme Court ruling last week issued in a lawsuit over a 2021 election law found that voting is not a fundamental right listed in the state Constitution's Bill of Rights. The finding drew sharp criticism from three dissenting justices on the high court. The Associated Press looks at what the ruling might mean for Kansas residents and future elections. WHAT IS THE ISSUE? The ruling itself is wide-reaching, combining different lawsuits at various stages of litigation that challenge three different segments of a 2021 election law passed by the Kansas Legislature. It was a lawsuit challenging a ballot signature verification measure in which a majority of the high court found there is no right to vote enshrined in the Kansas Constitution’s Bill of Rights. The measure requires election officials to match the signatures on advance mail ballots to a person’s voter registration record. The high court reversed a lower court’s dismissal of that lawsuit and instructed the lower court to consider whether the measure violates the equal protection rights of voters. But four of the court's seven justices rejected arguments that the measure violates voting rights under the state's Bill of Rights.
June 5, 20241 yr 46 minutes ago, Toastrel said: TIRED OF LEFTIST MISINFOMATION https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N3590Z4/
June 5, 20241 yr 29 minutes ago, Bear Grylls said: TIRED OF LEFTIST MISINFOMATION https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N3590Z4/ Ooh, do this one now!
June 6, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, mr_hunt said: I don't know. I didn't hear it. The cheers far outweigh the jeers. I can hear some yelling but I can't make it out.
June 6, 20241 yr Trump loses support in wake of his criminal conviction. https://www.yahoo.com/news/27-percent-trump-conviction-makes-161631847.html A third of them, 33 percent, said the Manhattan jury’s decision to convict him makes them less likely to back the Republican Party’s leader. With independents, 41 percent said it made an impact. Around 38 percent said they are less likely to vote for the former president
June 6, 20241 yr 3 hours ago, mr_hunt said: That Maga cult is so extreme they can't support the Police.
Create an account or sign in to comment