Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

The Eagles Message Board

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

cheeto the pedo thread - epstein’s bestie! another wonderful secret!

Featured Replies

1 minute ago, Toastrel said:

There is voting for the best candidate, and ignoring party.

You don't say?  Really?  You would vote for an actual person based on their qualifications and not because you're a D or R?  

What a concept.  Very Amercian.  Thank you, sir.

  • Replies 17.2k
  • Views 991.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

1 minute ago, DiPros said:

You don't say?  Really?  You would vote for an actual person based on their qualifications and not because you're a D or R?  

What a concept.  Very Amercian.  Thank you, sir.

I know it is a radical concept. In PA, by not having a party, I can't vote in primaries, but I refuse to dirty myself by associating with either face of our one party system.

8 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Others named were Powell, Eastman, Chesebro, Clark and one other person yet to be named.

"The best people"

1 minute ago, Toastrel said:

I know it is a radical concept. In PA, by not having a party, I can't vote in primaries, but I refuse to dirty myself by associating with either face of our one party system.

Me as well.  Makes us the difference in the general whether PA goes Red or Blue though.  At least the last few times.

4 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

They won't because you won't allow it.

He's incapable of realizing his "wait and see" attitude regarding Trump's crimes is the same sentiment shared by primary voters and the exact reason why Trump will win the nomination thereby destroying any chance of winning back the white house.

4 minutes ago, DiPros said:

You don't say?  Really?  You would vote for an actual person based on their qualifications and not because you're a D or R?  

What a concept.  Very Amercian.  Thank you, sir.

@Captain F votes for colors and letters, it's almost as if all he knows is what he learned on Sesame Street lmao.

1 minute ago, we_gotta_believe said:

He's incapable of realizing his "wait and see" attitude regarding Trump's crimes is the same sentiment shared by primary voters and the exact reason why Trump will win the nomination thereby destroying any chance of winning back the white house.

Naahhh he wants Trump to run in and win the election and just doesn't want to say it publicly. A bunch of them are taking the cowardly route.

I can't wait to see what best and brightest lawyers he has signed up for this. 

Just now, DaEagles4Life said:

I can't wait to see what best and brightest lawyers he has signed up for this. 

Would it be Joe TacoPenis again? 

31 minutes ago, DaEagles4Life said:

I can't wait to see what best and brightest lawyers he has signed up for this. 

A writer for The Simpsons has revealed a never-before-seen storyline with  Lionel Hutz - The Irish News

 

1 hour ago, VanHammersly said:

IMG_8097.jpeg

IMG_8098.jpeg

IMG_8099.jpeg

IMG_8100.jpeg

IMG_8101.jpeg

Moar

The last one really says it all 

IMG_8102.jpeg

IMG_8103.jpeg

IMG_8104.jpeg

 

 

 

1 hour ago, Toastrel said:

There is voting for the best candidate, and ignoring party.

This is certainly true but it's a very sad situation when the best candidate is a terrible choice.  It's like having to choose whether your left or right leg should be amputated.

Just now, GreenReaper said:

This is certainly true but it's a very sad situation when the best candidate is a terrible choice.  It's like having to choose whether your left or right leg should be amputated.

Maybe the Republicans should start having primaries again?

4 minutes ago, GreenReaper said:

This is certainly true but it's a very sad situation when the best candidate is a terrible choice.  It's like having to choose whether your left or right leg should be amputated.

Anyone who thinks Trump is the best candidate has a serious mental issue. He is not a terrible choice. He is a con man who tried to overthrow our government, because he's a sore loser.

image.jpeg.89ab9c66c5351cd450bd33c15cc431ab.jpeg

 

Come on you suckers, step up and send this snake oil salesman more of your money. Morons.

:roll:

May be an image of 1 person and text that says 'There are three main reasons lawyers quit cases. 1.Client won't accept their advice. 2. Client instructs the lawyer to do something which would compromise their professional duty i.e. lying in court. 3.The client won't pay. I suspect we've got the holy trinity here.'

 

Yup, grave offenses against the USA.

> with the possible exception of treason 

Just give it time.

Honesty if you look at it this is the late 19th century politics all over again. 
 

I hate it. 

2 hours ago, DaEagles4Life said:

I can't wait to see what best and brightest lawyers he has signed up for this. 

Fox was asking just yesterday why it seemed like Trump did not have the best lawyers. Not seriously. Not in prime time,but asking.

Mugshotz!

The 45 pages that skewer Trump’s bid to destroy American democracy

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/aug/02/donald-trump-indictment-pages-jack-smith-january-6-election-2020

Quote

"Why didn’t they do this 2.5 years ago?” the former president asked peevishly on Tuesday, shortly before the indictment came down. The answer lies in the document itself: in its painstaking command of detail and in the cool, crisp legal language deployed by special counsel Jack Smith to make his case.

This is the third time that Trump has been criminally indicted, and to some extent the shock value has worn off. Much of the content of the grand jury indictment filed in a federal court in Washington DC is familiar.

But no one can doubt the significance of its contents. For the first time in US history, legal charges have been brought against a president for attempting to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power that until 6 January 2021 had stood as a pillar of American values since a defeated John Adams quietly snuck out of the capital on 4 March 1801.

It’s taken two and a half years, sure, but Smith wastes no time in getting to the point. The second sentence of the indictment reads: "The defendant lost the 2020 presidential election”, taking us straight to that place where Trump so consequentially refused to go – the acceptance that he was a loser.

By the fourth sentence, it is clear that Smith has no intention of mincing his words. He rolls out the L-word – "lies” – with an ease which belies the months of angst that the editors of American newspapers went through before they felt comfortable enough to attach it to Trump.

Later, he accuses the former president of "fraud”, a charged word given the sequence of events. It was precisely that word that Trump used as the foundation stone of his bid to overturn the election – his lie that the 2020 election was riddled with fraud –and now it was being directed back at him.

Smith portrays the former president as a man who was prepared to tear down everything to stay in office. "Despite having lost, the Defendant was determined to remain in power.”

Why did Smith wait 2 1/2 years? Unlike the idiotic Democrat rush to impeach, doomed to failure, Smith is meticulous, and dotted every i, and crossed every t.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.