March 2, 20232 yr On 3/1/2023 at 3:33 AM, DrPhilly said: Updated recommendations now in Sweden from the government. Under 18 - No special recommendation 18-49 - Booster shot recommended between now and the onset of winter late next fall for "risk groups only" ; min 9 months since the previous booster 50-78 - Booster shot recommended for all between now and the onset of winter late next fall ; min 9 months since the previous booster (6 months min for peeople with special risks) 80+ - Two booster shots between now and the onset of winter late next fall ; min 6 months between shots Note: 94% of people tested over the last months have immunity via anti-bodies My last booster was 12/21. I chose not to get any more because the the virus was less lethal. It may not be as lethal, and a booster may or may not have kept me from getting it, but the inconvenience of getting it has been substantial. It couldn’t have been worse timing for me. I will go back to getting vaccinated for the seasonal flue as well as covid once the smoke clears.
March 2, 20232 yr 36 minutes ago, Tnt4philly said: My last booster was 12/21. I chose not to get any more because the the virus was less lethal. It may not be as lethal, and a booster may or may not have kept me from getting it, but the inconvenience of getting it has been substantial. It couldn’t have been worse timing for me. I will go back to getting vaccinated for the seasonal flue as well as covid once the smoke clears. I've had some trouble with both the 2nd and 3rd boosters with chest pain and fluttering heart beat so I may wait. I'm good now still since I have COVID over the summer. Probably going to start to be an issue in some months though. I'll have a tough decision at that point.
March 2, 20232 yr 1 hour ago, Tnt4philly said: The Mises caucus are right wing clowns and one of the many reasons keeping the LP from being a party or more than a groups of crackpots. So far the "left wing clowns" keep getting it wrong. If they were getting it right you might have an argument. The Fauci god is a false god.
March 2, 20232 yr To be honest, I'm kinda impressed with how much they were able to tie together into this yarn... Hunter Biden, the CIA, Fauci, Ukraine, smuggled bioweapons, Big Pharma, global elites, and the great reset. We're one George Soros reference away from a full bingo card!
March 2, 20232 yr 3 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: To be honest, I'm kinda impressed with how much they were able to tie together into this yarn... Hunter Biden, the CIA, Fauci, Ukraine, smuggled bioweapons, Big Pharma, global elites, and the great reset. We're one George Soros reference away from a full bingo card! Kz reading those tweets
March 3, 20232 yr As far as credible sources go, the gold standard is definitely Rob Schneider quoting twitter rando named TexasLindsey posting a video of a rando UK news channel with an unnamed woman spouting anti-vax gibberish.
March 3, 20232 yr 6 hours ago, we_gotta_believe said: As far as credible sources go, the gold standard is definitely Rob Schneider quoting twitter rando named TexasLindsey posting a video of a rando UK news channel with an unnamed woman spouting anti-vax gibberish.
March 6, 20232 yr Nothing wrong with a little biological attack on your own citizens to force compliance with government mandates now is there? https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/03/04/project-fear-covid-variant-lockdown-matt-hancock-whatsapp/ Quote [Secretary of State for Health and Social Care] Matt Hancock wanted to "deploy” a new Covid variant to "frighten the pants off” the public and ensure they complied with lockdown, leaked messages seen by The Telegraph have revealed. *** In a WhatsApp conversation on Dec 13, obtained by The Telegraph, Damon Poole – one of Mr Hancock’s media advisers – informed his boss that Tory MPs were "furious already about the prospect” of stricter Covid measures and suggested "we can roll pitch with the new strain”. The comment suggested that they believed the strain could be helpful in preparing the ground for a future lockdown and tougher restrictions in the run-up to Christmas 2020. Mr Hancock then replied: "We frighten the pants off everyone with the new strain.” Mr Poole agreed, saying: "Yep that’s what will get proper bahviour [sic] change.” *** Mr Hancock expressed his worry that talks over Brexit would dominate headlines and reduce the impact, and probed Mr Poole for his media advice. "When do we deploy the new variant,” asked Mr Hancock.
March 8, 20232 yr On 3/6/2023 at 10:34 AM, The_Omega said: Nothing wrong with a little biological attack on your own citizens to force compliance with government mandates now is there? https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/03/04/project-fear-covid-variant-lockdown-matt-hancock-whatsapp/ I don't think they were talking about deploying a new strain of COVID in the sense of somehow deliberately releasing the virus into the population. It seems to me that they were discussing talking up a newly detected variant before it started to ramp up. It was about the messaging.
March 8, 20232 yr 16 minutes ago, Arthur Jackson said: I don't think they were talking about deploying a new strain of COVID in the sense of somehow deliberately releasing the virus into the population. It seems to me that they were discussing talking up a newly detected variant before it started to ramp up. It was about the messaging. You think Zuker actually read the entire story?
March 9, 20232 yr 2 hours ago, lynched1 said: I don’t know the exact details of the laws in question but I don’t necessarily have a problem with defanging the health department. They are scientists not legislators.
March 9, 20232 yr 1 hour ago, Tnt4philly said: I don’t know the exact details of the laws in question but I don’t necessarily have a problem with defanging the health department. They are scientists not legislators. This is part of the problem. The health guys should have the biggest say on topics like COVID but they shouldn't have the final word.
March 9, 20232 yr 21 hours ago, Arthur Jackson said: I don't think they were talking about deploying a new strain of COVID in the sense of somehow deliberately releasing the virus into the population. It seems to me that they were discussing talking up a newly detected variant before it started to ramp up. It was about the messaging. I thought about that, but decided that can't be it.
March 9, 20232 yr 10 minutes ago, The_Omega said: I thought about that, but decided that can't be it. It's often worth one's while to apply skepticism to one's skepticism. Something to consider.
March 9, 20232 yr 16 minutes ago, Arthur Jackson said: It's often worth one's while to apply skepticism to one's skepticism. Something to consider. I’m skeptical of every post I’ve ever made, and read. You can be certain of that.
March 9, 20232 yr Just now, The_Omega said: I’m skeptical of every post I’ve ever made, and read. You can be certain of that. Good. Be even more so of mine, I have issues.
March 10, 20232 yr Define propaganda...... Cover up the truths that are inconvenient to government truth. "F that population, we got money to make".
March 10, 20232 yr 13 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: He's now claiming Stanford is a "government proxy?" Taibbi's lost the thread. It gets even better
Create an account or sign in to comment