October 18, 20205 yr 31 minutes ago, EaglesRocker97 said: In an ideal world, yes, but the people have proved incapable of doing that. I'm not suggesting and indefinite lockdown, but another 6-8 week lockdown is what is needed right now to get things back under control. We need to mitigate the impact of economic hardship. A lot of the population can work from home, but for those who can't and for the small businesses affected, we need to make them the monetary priority instead of the corporations. It's time to bailout the American people and actually give them benefits in return for their tax dollars. No that’s completely idiotic. The WHO has specifically said lockdowns aren’t the way to go. You’re a science denier.
October 18, 20205 yr 38 minutes ago, Phillyterp85 said: Well you are correct that masks aren’t a magical shield. There’s nothing magic about it, it’s strictly science. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newyorker.com/science/medical-dispatch/amid-the-coronavirus-crisis-a-regimen-for-reentry/amp "So how effective are surgical masks? A study published in Nature last month shows that, if worn properly and with the right fit, surgical masks are effective at blocking ninety-nine per cent of the respiratory droplets expelled by people with coronaviruses or influenza viruses. The material of a double-layered cotton mask—the kind many people have been making at home—can block droplet emissions as well. And the sars-CoV-2 virus does not last long on cloth; viral counts drop ninety-nine per cent in three hours. Cloth masks aren’t as breathable as surgical masks, though, and that’s important. Surgical masks are made of a melt-blown polypropylene fibre fabric, which, under magnification, looks like cotton candy. Most of the filtration this material provides isn’t from direct blockage but from an electrostatic charge applied to the fibre using a machine called, aptly enough, a corona charger. The static electricity captures viral particles the same way that a blanket in the dryer catches socks. This allows the material to breathe more freely” Yup, it still doesn’t prevent the spread of the disease. Listen, we can’t pick and choose which times we feel like following pandemic guidelines and only take it seriously when it’s convenient for us. Liberals flat out don’t care or are too selfish to worry about the people they’re literally killing by gathering in crowds of thousands. They’re murderers plain and simple.
October 18, 20205 yr 8 minutes ago, Kz! said: "Millions” lmfao Almost a quarter million in one year in this country alone. What are you laughing at? Your poor math skills?
October 18, 20205 yr Just now, EaglesRocker97 said: Almost a quarter million in one year in this country alone. What are u out laughing at? You.
October 18, 20205 yr Just now, Kz! said: You. You are one of the most laughable characters on here, so I'll take that as a compliment. Anything even somewhat logical is laughable to you because your reasoning skills are severely deficient.
October 18, 20205 yr I see more and more people not wearing masks in the last week. Wonder why that is?🤔. We were dealing with maybe 2-3 people now it's 20-30 a day
October 18, 20205 yr 59 minutes ago, EaglesRocker97 said: You are one of the most laughable characters on here, so I'll take that as a compliment. Anything even somewhat logical is laughable to you because your reasoning skills are severely deficient. You’re a Bernie bro who wants to lockdown businesses for 8 weeks while the government prints trillions to keep people alive. Lmao, at your superior reasoning skills.
October 18, 20205 yr Nope, if I was a Bernie bro, I wouldn't be voting for Biden. Hey, genius, you're ignoring the point I've : The government is going to print trillions of dollars either way. Better to print it for the people and the working class instead of the oligarchy. We've just chosen to do so for billionaires over the common man. These measures are extreme, yes, but desperate times call for desperate measures. This exigency demands a robust federal response. In the interest of both our long-term public and economic health. We will see more death and suffering from the virus and the economy will suffer for a longer period of time if we don't step in now and provide assistance. The problem last time was that we shut down but did nothing or next to nothing to help the small businesses and individuals who were most significantly affected. You ignoring that other wealthy nations have done this already and it has proven much more successful than our response. The actual level of assistance is something that you can debate, but the evidence shows that deaths could well reach the millions, as well as the evidence that we can and must provide greater intervention and economic assistance where it is most needed to both mitigate the virus and limit the economic hardship occurred.https://www.businessinsider.com/countries-offering-direct-payments-or-basic-income-in-corona-crisis-2020-4#germany-is-offering-aid-to-small-employers-and-to-freelancers-and-freelancers-in-berlin-can-get-over-5000-in-assistance-2 As an educator, it's pretty easy to spot poor reasoning skills when conversing with someone. You couldn't pass a middle school essay. Trumpbots are basically a case study in cognitive deficiency.
October 18, 20205 yr 1 hour ago, Kz! said: Yup, it still doesn’t prevent the spread of the disease. Listen, we can’t pick and choose which times we feel like following pandemic guidelines and only take it seriously when it’s convenient for us. Liberals flat out don’t care or are too selfish to worry about the people they’re literally killing by gathering in crowds of thousands. They’re murderers plain and simple. Yes it does. You cannot possibly be this stupid in real life. This has to be an act.
October 18, 20205 yr 10 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: Yes it does. You cannot possibly be this stupid in real life. This has to be an act. No, it can hinder the spread but it doesn’t stop it you Fing imbecile. Riot kitchen, Portland protests.
October 18, 20205 yr 27 minutes ago, EaglesRocker97 said: Nope, if I was a Bernie bro, I wouldn't be voting for Biden. Hey, genius, you're ignoring the point I've : The government is going to print trillions of dollars either way. Better to print it for the people and the working class instead of the oligarchy. We've just chosen to do so for billionaires over the common man. These measures are extreme, yes, but desperate times call for desperate measures. This exigency demands a robust federal response. In the interest of both our long-term public and economic health. We will see more death and suffering from the virus and the economy will suffer for a longer period of time if we don't step in now and provide assistance. The problem last time was that we shut down but did nothing or next to nothing to help the small businesses and individuals who were most significantly affected. You ignoring that other wealthy nations have done this already and it has proven much more successful than our response. The actual level of assistance is something that you can debate, but the evidence shows that deaths could well reach the millions, as well as the evidence that we can and must provide greater intervention and economic assistance where it is most needed to both mitigate the virus and limit the economic hardship occurred.https://www.businessinsider.com/countries-offering-direct-payments-or-basic-income-in-corona-crisis-2020-4#germany-is-offering-aid-to-small-employers-and-to-freelancers-and-freelancers-in-berlin-can-get-over-5000-in-assistance-2 As an educator, it's pretty easy to spot poor reasoning skills when conversing with someone. You couldn't pass a middle school essay. Trumpbots are basically a case study in cognitive deficiency. Long diatribe, no one cares. You’re a moron if you think shutting down businesses for 8 weeks is an actual option. Full stop.
October 18, 20205 yr 8 minutes ago, Kz! said: Long diatribe, no one cares. You’re a moron if you think shutting down businesses for 8 weeks is an actual option. Full stop. I know, a couple of paragraphs is too "long" for your short-circuiting brain to comprehend. Again, with the poor reasoning skills and inability to debate someone who uses evidence to support a claim. I know you're just flailing about from a place of deep-seated insecurity. It's ok. Stay in school and study hard, kids, or you'll end up a pathetic loser who can't form a basic argument like Kz!
October 18, 20205 yr 3 minutes ago, EaglesRocker97 said: I know, a couple of paragraphs is too "long" for your short-circuiting brain to comprehend. Again, with the poor reasoning skills and inability to debate someone who uses evidence to support a claim. Stay in school and study hard, kids, or you'll end up a pathetic loser who can't form a basic argument like Kz! You’re a literal Bernie bro who wants to shut businesses for 8 weeks. You have 0 experience or knowledge of the private sector. You have the mentality of a naive child, mr. brilliant history teacher.
October 18, 20205 yr 11 minutes ago, Kz! said: You’re a literal Bernie bro who wants to shut businesses for 8 weeks. You have 0 experience or knowledge of the private sector. You have the mentality of a naive child, mr. brilliant history teacher. More evidence for you:https://www.aa.com.tr/en/americas/canada-to-pay-can-2-000-monthly-to-those-out-of-work/1779497https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/06/business/europe-coronavirus-labor-help.html I know, it hurts you so much that someone can use evidence to support a position that refutes your nonsense, so you just ignore it and "REEEEEEEE" like a helpless moron in response. You're so f***ing stupid it's hilarious.
October 18, 20205 yr 26 minutes ago, Kz! said: No, it can hinder the spread but it doesn’t stop it you Fing imbecile. Riot kitchen, Portland protests. Hindering the spread MEANS it stops it. Just because it doesn't stop it 100% doesn't mean it's ineffective. It's VERY effective at preventing the spread of the disease. If everybody wore masks consistently we'd be living much more normal lives.
October 18, 20205 yr 1 minute ago, JohnSnowsHair said: Hindering the spread MEANS it stops it. Just because it doesn't stop it 100% doesn't mean it's ineffective. It's VERY effective at preventing the spread of the disease. If everybody wore masks consistently we'd be living much more normal lives. So it doesn’t prevent the spread, right? You agree that wearing masks doesn’t completely stop it, correct? So you knew exactly what I meant, you just wanted to call me a moron because you’re probably still butthurt from one of our exchanges weeks ago. Probably over riot kitchen or something
October 18, 20205 yr 3 hours ago, EaglesRocker97 said: I'm not suggesting and indefinite lockdown, but another 6-8 week lockdown is what is needed right now to get things back under control. And that really wouldn’t do anything. People who aren’t going to wear a mask when around others, are still going to not wear a mask when around others during a lockdown and Still will hang around other people and spread the virus. In the meantime you’re causing hardship on people who WOULD be wearing a mask when around others.
October 18, 20205 yr 13 minutes ago, EaglesRocker97 said: More evidence for you:https://www.aa.com.tr/en/americas/canada-to-pay-can-2-000-monthly-to-those-out-of-work/1779497https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/06/business/europe-coronavirus-labor-help.html I know, it hurts you so much that someone can use evidence to support a position that refutes your nonsense, so you just ignore it and "REEEEEEEE" like a helpless moron in response. You're so f***ing stupid it's hilarious. 8 week lockdown Bernie bro. I literally need no argument because you’re such a gigantic moron that no serious person would ever suggest shutting down the economy for that long over a virus that 99% of people will recover from. It’s so ridiculous only an adult socialist no experience outside the public sector would suggest it. Lmfao
October 18, 20205 yr 4 minutes ago, Kz! said: 8 week lockdown Bernie bro. I literally need no argument because you’re such a gigantic moron that no serious person would ever suggest shutting down the economy for that long over a virus that 99% of people will recover from. It’s so ridiculous only an adult socialist no experience outside the public sector would suggest it. Lmfao Blah, blah, blah. You still haven't addressed the fact I've shown that multiple countries have already done some version of what I'm suggesting (and they're probably going to do it again). Democratic socialism is right around the corner, and I can't wait to watch you and all the other pathetic right-wing scumbags like you cry like little b*tches when the people finally take back the reins of government. Now, I'm gonna enjoy the game. Have fun being an idiot!
October 18, 20205 yr 2 minutes ago, EaglesRocker97 said: Democratic socialism is right around the corner, and I can't wait to watch you and all the other pathetic right-wing scumbags like you cry like little b*tches when the people finally take back the reins of government. "Socialism is coming, yay!" Oh, sorry, wait. "Democratic socialism is coming, yay!"
October 18, 20205 yr Just now, hukdonfoniks said: "Socialism is coming, yay!" Oh, sorry, wait. "Democratic socialism is coming, yay!" I know, we never recovered from the New Deal. Europe is in shambles, too.
October 18, 20205 yr 2 hours ago, Kz! said: Yup, it still doesn’t prevent the spread of the disease. Listen, we can’t pick and choose which times we feel like following pandemic guidelines and only take it seriously when it’s convenient for us. Liberals flat out don’t care or are too selfish to worry about the people they’re literally killing by gathering in crowds of thousands. They’re murderers plain and simple. Yes, it absolutely DOES prevent the spread of the virus. It’s why infections among hospital workers plummeted to almost after hospitals instituted 24/7 mask policies. where have I said we should pick and choose when we feel like following guidelines? People shouldn’t be engaging in large gatherings without physical distancing, and people shouldn’t be around others without wearing masks s. It’s pretty simple Kz.
October 18, 20205 yr Lmao a literal socialist wants businesses locked down for 8 weeks, and is calling other people morons. This is the content I’m here for.
October 18, 20205 yr 18 minutes ago, Kz! said: So it doesn’t prevent the spread, right? You agree that wearing masks doesn’t completely stop it, correct? So you knew exactly what I meant, you just wanted to call me a moron because you’re probably still butthurt from one of our exchanges weeks ago. Probably over riot kitchen or something
October 18, 20205 yr Just now, Phillyterp85 said: Yes, it absolutely DOES prevent the spread of the virus. It’s why infections among hospital workers plummeted to almost after hospitals instituted 24/7 mask policies. where have I said we should pick and choose when we feel like following guidelines? People shouldn’t be engaging in large gatherings without physical distancing, and people shouldn’t be around others without wearing masks s. It’s pretty simple Kz. Again, masks don’t completely prevent the spread. Didn’t think I needed the qualifier "completely” but I guess I did. All I’m saying is that the leftists who defied social distancing recommendations to pile on top of each other in the thousands are complete morons who are murdering people by spreading this disease. They’re disgusting killers. Sorry if you want to defend them.
Create an account or sign in to comment