IDK,I just don't like the exposure of this decision when we carry a few useless LB's that won't play. I would rather risk losing 2 LB's in one game than 2 RB's is all I am saying

You’d expect LB to be some good ST guys for you.

On the bright side-WE GOT YOUNGER!!!!!

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You’d expect LB to be some good ST guys for you.

I could expect Huntley to be good ST'er for me

Big thing is still this is just the initial 53 this roster will have changes tomorrow when we can make waiver claims and place guys on IR. Let’s wait for the finished product before we overreact on the 53 

Usually keep a S extra on for ST also. But it looks like they might have that in the LB room more this year.

Jack Stoll could also be a factor in the RB decision pretty sure he got FB looks. If we view him as that hybrid TE/FB type. 

3 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Big thing is still this is just the initial 53 this roster will have changes tomorrow when we can make waiver claims and place guys on IR. Let’s wait for the finished product before we overreact on the 53 

That’s what we do! Hah….nah…I think we all expect some bottom of the roster maneuvering still.

I also think they will regret keeping "Augusts darling" Jjaw

Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Jack Stoll could also be a factor in the RB decision pretty sure he got FB looks. If we view him as that hybrid TE/FB type. 

They were talking about maybe doing some Pro look two back sets. He could be interesting involved in that. Figured he’d start on the PS. But he could be a quality contributor learning all parts of Siri’s offense. Good value player that we can have longer term.

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

I also think they will regret keeping "Augusts darling" Jjaw

I don’t care for any of our backup WRs hope there is a waiver claim for a WR in the works 

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

That’s what we do! Hah….nah…I think we all expect some bottom of the roster maneuvering still.

Well if I didn't whine like a little girl  we'd have nothing to talk about 🤣

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

They were talking about maybe doing some Pro look two back sets. He could be interesting involved in that. Figured he’d start on the PS. But he could be a quality contributor learning all parts of Siri’s offense. Good value player that we can have longer term.

What surprised me(in a good way) was how fast Jackson ousted Rogers from this team

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I don’t care for any of our backup WRs hope there is a waiver claim for a WR in the works 

That last TD kept his(Jjaw) sorry butt on the roster and if Siri is that easily swayed by a play "here or there" we're going to have issues

Jjaw is the new Hollins. We have to keep one useless player around annually

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I also think they will regret keeping "Augusts darling" Jjaw

Very good ST. Hard worker. Seems like he’s a solid part of the locker room. Siri is supposed to excel in WR play. I don’t think we are looking for huge receiving numbers. He’s a very willing blocker which helps break the big plays.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Very good ST. Hard worker. Seems like he’s a solid part of the locker room. Siri is supposed to excel in WR play. I don’t think we are looking for huge receiving numbers. He’s a very willing blocker which helps break the big plays.

ZZZZZZZ that's a snoozer excuse bro

So they kept the 2 guys I don;'t like Jjaw and Dillard .. Dillard ok as a BU,and I think he likes that role, so now no need to pay him alot

8 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Jack Stoll could also be a factor in the RB decision pretty sure he got FB looks. If we view him as that hybrid TE/FB type. 

Gotta say he looked good in that one game until the muffed tip. But he tries hard. Will be interesting to see how he is used. He looked fairly effective in the RZ

Once one of the starters goes down for any period of time this will become a move of need. Probably more go to whoever we keep on the PS…like how Ward moved up.

Hightower seems like the top obvious option.

Much depends on how good a look they want to get from Hurts. Much of that I’d say depends on keeping Ertz this season.  Having him and Goedert takes much pressure off losing one WR.

Expect much from The Slim Reaper. Whether he’s a ‘go’ or not will be huge each game.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Much depends on how good a look they want to get from Hurts. Much of that I’d say depends on keeping Ertz this season.  Having him and Goedert takes much pressure off losing one WR.

It helps. SB NP going forward with Goedert and Jackson

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Expect much from The Slim Reaper. Whether he’s a ‘go’ or not will be huge each game.

He's resilient because no one can catch him lol

4 hours ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Mike Kaye

 

@mike_e_kaye

 

While doing some digging, I heard the #Eagles staff was really impressed by sixth-round pick Tarron Jackson, who had a standout performance against the #Jets Friday. I had him off the 53, but I think he makes it. Have also heard Josiah Scott impressed coaches in the final week

For what it’s worth 

Jackson was one who I think sticks

Howie kept insisting that it is NOT just about the INITIAL 53 but the best 70 in his and Nick's presser.  I suspect players like Howard, Rogers , s/b back as pointed out by ' 93 ' many of those players that were waived on this 2021 team are probably safe and could survive the waiver wire,  rookies that made the initial 53 can, like the veterans go back to the practice squad. 17 game plus season . Gonna need all 70 on the team.

Awosika and Opeta back on PS. Howard brought back after roster settles.  Jackson on IR. Hightower back on PS. Taylor on IR leaving six LB. So we need a PS corner. Probably looking for a PS Safety. Who wants the PS running back job? Stevens would be expected to be PS linebacker.  McGill will get off COVID reserve before long.

9 minutes ago, EaglesTD123 said:

Jackson was one who I think sticks

I already am getting too excited about him and Milton. Really want to see him get in the action.