4 hours ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Mmmmm honestly think this offseason will make it weird to picking guys up for different camps we don’t get to see any of them play no preseasons....Think we will see a lot of guys pass through waivers that maybe wouldn’t if we had some preseason games and film of them out there 

Killins is flat out a burner(you know like we have all wanted) he ran the same 4o as Ruggs,but was NOT invited to the combine.Someone will snag him for his speedy return ability if nothing else

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Killins is flat out a burner(you know like we have all wanted) he ran the same 4o as Ruggs,but was NOT invited to the combine.Someone will snag him for his speedy return ability if nothing else

Mmmmmm I’ll just wait and see we seem to say this all the time and then guys clear waivers.... We will find out today if someone claimed Killins 

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Mmmmmm I’ll just wait and see we seem to say this all the time and then guys clear waivers.... We will find out today if someone claimed Killins 

Cut really because of Scott.We don't need 2 with the same skill set(Killins is faster but Scott knows the plays).So possibly we pick up Killins on the PS,but still think we roster another RB

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

but still think we roster another RB

I’m iffy on this one would not shock me if we carry 4 RBs but at the same time with the new PS rules we could just call a guy up if needed 

Know cuts have to be made, but we waived guys yesterday, waivers are open for 24 hrs

185,000 deaths is BS? Lingering heart wall thickening and changes in the brains of survivors is BS?

It is what it is

We are what we are.

So if we have say Killins and Holyfield on roster.... Scott’s our one week boom call Killins up for that game... He goes back to practice after the game 

Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I’m iffy on this one would not shock me if we carry 4 RBs but at the same time with the new PS rules we could just call a guy up if needed 

Yeah thats true,but then you need to worry about IN GAME.Like say (god forbid) Sanders goes down the first play of a game.I don;t see Clement "carrying the load",so to cover I would still roster 4

Can also protect believe 4 players from getting poached... Is it weekly or do we make that known at the start not sure on that one???? 

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Yeah thats true,but then you need to worry about IN GAME.Like say (god forbid) Sanders goes down the first play of a game.I don;t see Clement "carrying the load",so to cover I would still roster 4

I mean between clement and Scott think they can handle it... Scott was our top back couple games last year when Sanders missed some time last and Howard was MIA.

1 minute ago, mjkline1958 said:

Know cuts have to be made, but we waived guys yesterday, waivers are open for 24 hrs

185,000 deaths is BS? Lingering heart wall thickening and changes in the brains of survivors is BS?

It is what it is

We are what we are.

90% of those were not directly due to covid,it was a "contributor" to other issues.Follow the science right???? The science says you have a better chance of dying in a car wreck,which I said long ago

3 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

So if we have say Killins and Holyfield on roster.... Scott’s our one week boom call Killins up for that game... He goes back to practice after the game 

I don't see us rostering 5.Holyfield may end up back on the roster,but I think possibly we have our eye on a possible cut from another

 team

Can’t we carry extra OL on roster as well I’m real iffy on the new roster rules lmao.... like we can carry 55 players but the 8 have to be OL or something or maybe that is....

I don’t know lol could be botching it I have to go read them again 

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I mean between clement and Scott think they can handle it... Scott was our top back couple games last year when Sanders missed some time last and Howard was MIA.

It would change the play calling,thats a fact.Clement is not the bruiser Sanders is

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I don't see us rostering 5.Holyfield may end up back on the roster,but I think possibly we have our eye on a possible cut from another

 team

I meant on the PS not active roster my bad lol with 16 PS spaces definitely see us carrying both of we liked them 

Right now my gut says we go with 3 RB on roster and stash 1-2 guys on PS... Take advantage of the new rule if/when we need to 

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I meant on the PS not active roster my bad lol with 16 PS spaces definitely see us carrying both of we liked them 

I could see that,still we would be looking at rostering #4 in my view.I understand you can call guys up,but not for the game you are in at the time.I would just feel better CMA.So with roster expansion why would you carry LESS than before? IDK I think 3 rostered is playing with fire.In a tight game you need someone who could step in right now.Clement can,but the plays would have to change.I would rather keep the plays the same and plug in another bruiser back.

Is Devonta Freeman still out there? How about Guice? He's young.Freeman is not that old either

5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I could see that,still we would be looking at rostering #4 in my view.I understand you can call guys up,but not for the game you are in at the time.I would just feel better CMA.So with roster expansion why would you carry LESS than before? IDK I think 3 rostered is playing with fire.In a tight game you need someone who could step in right now.Clement can,but the plays would have to change.I would rather keep the plays the same and plug in another bruiser back.

I mean Sanders isn’t really much of a bruiser either think him and Clement play similar styles. About the same sizes to.... Think Sanders is faster though more agile/wiggle in him 

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Is Devonta Freeman still out there? How about Guice? He's young

Guice is dealing with some domestic violence charges against him... Not sure on Freeman 

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I mean Sanders isn’t really much of a bruiser either think him and Clement play similar styles. About the same sizes to.... Think Sanders is faster though more agile/wiggle in him 

Guice is dealing with some domestic violence charges against him... Not sure on Freeman 

Prosise(sp) is another

Right now with how our roster breakdown is looking think it could be hard to go 4 RBs.... We have 7 WRs at the moment and honestly don’t see us cutting anymore might get little relief for couple weeks if Alshon put on PuP. Along with 3 TEs and 3 QBs.looking at 15-16 players not counting the OL.

Dougs Tendency for OL is usually 10 guys 

Also with the acqusition of Fournette I would be interested to see who TB releases

4 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Right now with how our roster breakdown is looking think it could be hard to go 4 RBs.... We have 7 WRs at the moment and honestly don’t see us cutting anymore might get little relief for couple weeks if Alshon put on PuP. Along with 3 TEs and 3 QBs.looking at 15-16 players not counting the OL.

Dougs Tendency for OL is usually 10 guys 

IDK so now the Alshon trade comes into view for a possible additional RB.Just a matter of time before he clears med.The "buying" team would have to wait a bit.So IDK,but think we go 6 WR's as has been the norm and 4 RB's.We still have time to sort this out

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

IDK so now the Alshon trade comes into view for a possible additional RB.Just a matter of time before he clears med.The "buying" team would have to wait a bit.So IDK,but thhnk we go 6 WR's as has been the norm and 4 RB's.We still have time to sort this out

That is if/when we move Alshon until then we have 7 guys at WR unless someone comes up with a mysterious injury and goes to IR lol wouldn’t be the first time teams have done it.

You know TB could maybe use Alshon. They would have time to wait a bit.They lost Perriman,so wondering before the Fournette grab who the #2 RB in TB was

I have also heard Hurts could be a reason why we could go 3 RBs... Not saying I agree just relying info. Because of what Hurts brings at the goal line as an option QB