10 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Doesn’t make any sense at this time. Sounds completely bogus. 

Yeah. I call BS on this too. It COULD be true, but until we hear it firsthand from the owner, I call BS.

2 hours ago, Senhorcook said:

Yeah. I call BS on this too. It COULD be true, but until we hear it firsthand from the owner, I call BS.

Oh I think it’s absolutely true that Lurie is the one who wants Hurts.  If you think about things, it absolutely makes sense.

6 hours ago, Senhorcook said:

Yeah. I call BS on this too. It COULD be true, but until we hear it firsthand from the owner, I call BS.

Sen,remember "Bradford is our QB?" That was the week before we traded him. "Wentz will be our QB for years to come" Until we drafted this clown. If they come out and say "we have full faith in Hurts to lead us in the future",he's gone lol

We have the WR's, the TE situation isn't terrible, he RB room is solid, the O line is doing well, so tell me again why we cannot put up 34 points a game

10 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Doesn’t make any sense at this time. Sounds completely bogus. 

Coming from the guy that believed every rumor on Wentz no matter what…. I mean honestly it sounds accurate we all know Howie has been doing extensive looks into numerous QBs already… Watson,Wilson attending Pitt/NC game for Pickett/Howell two of the top QB coming out 

10 hours ago, Senhorcook said:

Yeah. I call BS on this too. It COULD be true, but until we hear it firsthand from the owner, I call BS.

Yes because Lurie and Howie are going to come out directly be and say Hurts isn’t it we going to trade him lol…. These are the guys that extended Bradford then traded for Wentz then traded Bradford after saying he was the starter 7 days before the season, Said Wentz was the QB before trading him, wouldn’t name Hurts the starter until what the season started while actively trying to pursue Watson…. 
 

Fsct is we are never goin to get direct firsthand from these two 

This is one of the hardest stretches of football to me… On one hand I don’t want to just loss games can’t tell players to go out and lose just to help draft stock but on the flip if we win we hurt our draft stock and I don’t think we are go enough to go anywhere even if we make the playoffs 

1 hour ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

This is one of the hardest stretches of football to me… On one hand I don’t want to just loss games can’t tell players to go out and lose just to help draft stock but on the flip if we win we hurt our draft stock and I don’t think we are go enough to go anywhere even if we make the playoffs 

If we play like last week,there is no need to worry about adding to the loss column 🙄

Besides the offense being less than consistently functional, I really need to see this D line in the Jets backfield OFTEN. They have been a letdown for me this year. The tandem of Mailiata/Dickerson they stumbled upon seems to work. Lets leave that ALONE!!! ROT is still a sore spot for me because I don't need ahead case deciding at game time if he is playing or not,so Lane c r a p or get off the pot or that decision will be made for you(I hope)

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/nfl-defense-sacks-2021   While reviewing this please note only a few teams played 12 games,so we are farther behind than this indicates when this was done

Using the site click on the sack stat to arrange them and you will see us near the bottom WITH an extra game played. Less than middle of the pack on INT's also,but we seen to get them at opportune times

5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Using the site click on the sack stat to arrange them and you will see us near the bottom WITH an extra game played. Less than middle of the pack on INT's also,but we seen to get them at opportune times

Here is a better indicator...  5 and 7 vs the easiest schedule, with opponents missing key players.    In other words, things have gone almost perfectly for us to be 5-7.      In life, things don't always go that way.  To be only 5-7, it says all we need to know.... without looking at any stats.

18 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Here is a better indicator...  5 and 7 vs the easiest schedule, with opponents missing key players.    In other words, things have gone almost perfectly for us to be 5-7.      In life, things don't always go that way.  To be only 5-7, it says all we need to know.... without looking at any stats.

5-7 is mostly on the lack of coherent offense. Our D line is not performing up to snuff either

https://www.tankathon.com/nfl/eagles    updated. I am fine with their first 4 choices. I don't  think we need a RB that badly. S or DT there for me

I have Leal-DT,Wilson-WR,Lloyd-LB,then McCreary-CB and Carter-DE. 

7 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

We have the WR's, the TE situation isn't terrible, he RB room is solid, the O line is doing well, so tell me again why we cannot put up 34 points a game

What WR? Watkins stopped running his routes. Reagor dropped everything. What TE situation? Goedert is good. But he seemed to get lost right after he got paid here. Stoll is good….at blocking. Tyree….haven’t even seen him. Solid RB room? As in Howard is out hurt. Sanders has been hurt andtrying to play. So you love Scott as the elite Rb I guess. Oline keeps shuffling.

12 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

What WR? Watkins stopped running his routes. Reagor dropped everything. What TE situation? Goedert is good. But he seemed to get lost right after he got paid here. Stoll is good….at blocking. Tyree….haven’t even seen him. Solid RB room? As in Howard is out hurt. Sanders has been hurt andtrying to play. So you love Scott as the elite Rb I guess. Oline keeps shuffling.

LMAO oh you can do injuries all day. Assuming all are healthy our RB room is ok or as decent as most. Maybe watkins is giving up(like I said they would) because he has no QB capable of using his speed. Reagor is trash and needs replaced. Goedert/Stoll BLOCK because HURTS can't decide himself out of a paper bag and needs the added protection. Jax will be or has the potential to be a decent TE.Smith is a stud Hurts can't get the ball to. of course if you want to replace EVERY player that gets injured,you're gonna have problems

BTW it's ,not like we are working our RB's to death here either

52 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Besides the offense being less than consistently functional, I really need to see this D line in the Jets backfield OFTEN. They have been a letdown for me this year. The tandem of Mailiata/Dickerson they stumbled upon seems to work. Lets leave that ALONE!!! ROT is still a sore spot for me because I don't need ahead case deciding at game time if he is playing or not,so Lane c r a p or get off the pot or that decision will be made for you(I hope)

Has Lane even been questionable since he came back?

1 minute ago, Asg 15 said:

Has Lane even been questionable since he came back?

IDK,it has just put doubt in my head that he cannot be counted on and really that ROT position you need to have faith in IMO. I don't need to hear on Saturday that he has mental issues and won't play

26 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

What WR? Watkins stopped running his routes. Reagor dropped everything. What TE situation? Goedert is good. But he seemed to get lost right after he got paid here. Stoll is good….at blocking. Tyree….haven’t even seen him. Solid RB room? As in Howard is out hurt. Sanders has been hurt andtrying to play. So you love Scott as the elite Rb I guess. Oline keeps shuffling.

Is Sanders elite?? Not in my book. I like Howard and hope he stays,not long but long enough for us to find another young basher. it was amazingly stupid that he was stuck on the PS for so long when he could have been at LEAST been our 3rd and short guy. The stupidity here amazes me

11 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Is Sanders elite?? Not in my book. I like Howard and hope he stays,not long but long enough for us to find another young basher. it was amazingly stupid that he was stuck on the PS for so long when he could have been at LEAST our 3rd and short guy. The stupidity here amazes me

Clearly was Hurts fault to keep Howard on the PS.

Or to not realize our Oline situation or offensive situation to not start the season running the ball. Borderline criminal if you ask me.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Clearly was Hurts fault to keep Howard on the PS.

Who said that, or are you back to trying to convince yourself Hurts is not one of the main problems on offense?

But yes, other than QB I can’t think of a single offense with more talent. We should be scoring 70 points a game.

5 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

But yes, other than QB I can’t think of a single offense with more talent. We should be scoring 70 points a game.

How about 34???? If we had a QB we could