We are spending plenty on WR in draft capital. But we aren’t choosing wisely OR developing that talent. 

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I said "or” ….just feels like we need to bring in a proven vet. He’ll likely really help our youngsters in house by showing them some of his learned craft. Because we obviously aren’t getting that part done.

To develop WR's you need  QB. We lack that and I can't see forking out big bucks with a running style QB who targets them 2 times a game for 5 yards. IMO it's a waste of resources at this time

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

We are spending plenty on WR in draft capital. But we aren’t choosing wisely OR developing that talent. 

Smith is fine,Quez was a surprise,he is fine.If you put Smith in TB  or LA he would be kicking arse

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Dickerson was a C. We draft C's and make them G's,but the fact is they were C's in college

Dickerson was everything. So….What’s your point? Dickerson next to Mailata is looking very good right now. Dickerson looks like he might even earn some honors as a LG over his career.

I would rather spend draft capital than monetary capital if I can avoid it

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

To develop WR's you need  QB. We lack that and I can't see forking out big bucks with a running style QB who targets them 2 times a game for 5 yards. IMO it's a waste of resources at this time

Like your boy Wentz? Well that already failed to develop any receivers.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Dickerson was everything. So….What’s your point? Dickerson next to Mailata is looking very good right now. Dickerson looks like he might even earn some honors as a LG over his career.

So do you draft a C or a G? Maybe Dickerson would kill it at C? We don't know

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Like your boy Wentz? Well that already failed to develop any receivers.

LMAO what did he have to develop???? We had no decent rook WR's Fulgham?? Ward?? please that is a lousy example. Most others were FA's we BOUGHT(no development needed)

56 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Yes, he’s a beast! He has almost a thousand yards already and 8 TDs.

Ok. Was he worth  the Bungles not getting a stud O lineman to protect their franchise QB?

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So do you draft a C or a G? Maybe Dickerson would kill it at C? We don't know

LMAO what did he have to develop???? We had no decent rook WR's Fulgham?? Ward?? please that is a lousy example

Agholor, JJAW, Quez, Hightower Reagor….all failed under Wentz

5 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

We are spending plenty on WR in draft capital. But we aren’t choosing wisely OR developing that talent. 

Thsi doesn't surprise anyone.

Even Mack Hollins is having a respectable year in Miami

As far as the O line I would be more concerned for a ROT than a G or C. Lane is becoming unreliable as far as playing staus. When he plays he's great,but how often is he going to take games off for his mental issues?

1 minute ago, Asg 15 said:

Ok. Was he worth  the Bungles not getting a stud O lineman to protect their franchise QB?

Yes. Chase is a beast! They need Oline. But if they didn’t take chase….we wouldn’t have traded back. We definitely would have taken him.

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

As far as the O line I would be more concerned for a ROT than a G or C. Lane is becoming unreliable as far as playing staus. When he plays he's great,but how often is he going to take games off for his mental issues?

So Lane missing a few games with mental problems is a bigger issue than Kelce being ready to retire this offseason? I disagree.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Agholor, JJAW, Quez, Hightower Reagor….all failed under Wentz

Agholor was a fail since day 1-another Reagor head case. Jjaw is Jjaw,he's never going to be a star,Quez is fine, Hightower is a BU you have no point here either. How does a QB suceed with 4th string O linemen?

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

So Lane missing a few games with mental problems is a bigger issue than Kelce being ready to retire this offseason? I disagree.

Disagree all you want, a GOOD ROT is harder to find than a G. Herbig took some C snaps. We can find "Herbigs" all day long

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Agholor was a fail since day 1-another Reagor head case. Jjaw is Jjaw,he's never going to be a star,Quez is fine, Hightower is a BU you have no point here either. How does a QB suceed with 4th string O linemen?

How many excuses you have for us not developing WR? So many that…..we probably should just pick up a quality vet FA. Maybe his experience will help the youngsters.

Unfortunately Ham we have played our way out of the top  line guys by winning in a season that means nothing vs the worst teams in the NFL

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

How many excuses you have for us not developing WR? So many that…..we probably should just pick up a quality vet FA. Maybe his experience will help the youngsters.

RIght,so you want Hurts throwing to a 12 million dollar WR 2 times a game for 10 yards. he RUNS, why are you wasting money on a top FA WR?

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Disagree all you want, a GOOD ROT is harder to find than a G. Herbig took some C snaps. We can find "Herbigs" all day long

Herbig came in at C and the O went to crap. That’s why watching the games is important. Herbig came in and called for a hold first okay negating a thirty yard Hurts play. Then got called again for a hold negating a long Scott TD. Herbig was decent at RG against the Jets at least. He’s the fourth option at best though you do realize.

Why I want Wilson and Strong because we need a QB who THROWS the ball(and this costs basically nothing to do)

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Herbig came in at C and the O went to crap. That’s why watching the games is important. Herbig came in and called for a hold first okay negating a thirty yard Hurts play. Then got called again for a hold negating a long Scott TD. Herbig was decent at RG against the Jets at least. He’s the fourth option at best though you do realize.

So get a C,in round 4 or 5. Good C's fall down the list because noone needs many of them. Supply and demand

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

RIght,so you want Hurts throwing to a 12 million dollar WR 2 times a game for 10 yards. he RUNS, why are you wasting money on a top FA WR?

He threw to Reagor eight times against the Giants. Reagor crapped the bed. Wonder if Hurts throws were to Godwin instead of Reagor what the results would be? Hmmmmm…..I don’t think you’d have much ammo to complain about hurts is what I think.

Obviously you and I have a totally opposite view of how to rebuild a team. You want to buy a team(like the dream team we tried once). I do not

27 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

already is an elite runner. No question there.

Never denied Hurts being a great runner his passing though is the issue and as I have said numerous times the most important part for a QB is being a passer 

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Why I want Wilson and Strong because we need a QB who THROWS the ball(and this costs basically nothing to do)

So get a C,in round 4 or 5. Good C's fall down the list because noone needs many of them. Supply and demand

Maybe….but not what I’m seeing. And when Kelce goes down our team falls to crap. I think I can easily make a case for trading  up for Linderbaum being the wisest move of all. Maybe we’ll get lucky and he’ll fall to us.

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Obviously you and I have a totally opposite view of how to rebuild a team. You want to buy a team(like the dream team we tried once). I do not

I think to build a team you have to use both effectively FA and the draft…. I mean 2017 doesn’t happen for us if not for some good FA additions and some good draft picks.