2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Lmao again I love how you use the injuries as an excuse for us but blow them off when we beat the Saints the double standards with you 

I said the offense did pretty well even though we had our entire Oline starting at new positions.

22 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I’m just saying these ‘starting QBs’ you are just weeping for our opponents missing weren’t so great. Wasn’t like beating the Pack without Rodgers. You’re arguing that about Jameis Winston out. I’d argue their third stringer Trevor Simeon might be a better option.

  But really my only argument is we have improved since the first half of the season. For a new young team….pretty obvious thing….to grow.

QUICK,without looking who is our QB3??? Would we win a game with him? We played alot of teams in a similar situation,WOO HOO we beat them!!(OSU vs your HS again)

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

 It no out offense was terrible via the Bucs final score makes the game look closer then the reality of that game.

Bucs had 11 drives(one drive was at the end of the half they took a knee with 30 secs)

we had 10 drives 

Whats the difference Bucs Bucs offense moved the ball we didn’t 

Difference was mostly Brady started the game 11 of 12 scoring two TDs on the first two drives. We came back….but he finished the game unstoppable also. D couldn’t get a stop. Not the first defense to fail to stop Brady.

Like Trini said,the BS stops(not this week cause we're gonna wussie  around and play the equipment crew) but soon

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Difference was mostly Brady started the game 11 of 12 scoring two TDs on the first two drives. We came back….but he finished the game unstoppable also. D couldn’t get a stop. Not the first defense to fail to stop Brady.

Difference is we couldn’t do anything offensively see your blame the D for the final series I blame the offense for doing basically nothing the entire game.

Sorry I don’t excuse poor play for 3/4 qtrs.

4 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

 It no out offense was terrible via the Bucs final score makes the game look closer then the reality of that game.

Bucs had 11 drives(one drive was at the end of the half they took a knee with 30 secs)

we had 10 drives 

Whats the difference Bucs Bucs offense moved the ball we didn’t 

I disagree. Hurts got us down by only six with over three minutes to play. D gets a stop we have a real chance to beat them.

The bigger point of it all I’d this has been a theme of the season us not doing anything offensively for 2-3 qtrs. 
 

Again it’s fine when we play the Giants with no offense but when we have played teams that can score 

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

I disagree. Hurts got us down by only six with over three minutes to play. D gets a stop we have a real chance to beat them.

And read above post I disagree with you 100% you love to excuse the other 3 qtrs I don’t we played like crap chasing points at the end of the game… No wonder the D was having issues they spent the whole game on the field because we couldn’t keep driving going 

 

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Difference is we couldn’t do anything offensively see your blame the D for the final series I blame the offense for doing basically nothing the entire game.

Sorry I don’t excuse poor play for 3/4 qtrs.

I blamed the D for not getting a stop with over three minutes to play….to give us a chance. I blame Siri for having his head up his butt for the early part of the season offensive game plan. We are the top rushing team…..I knew we should be great at it….most knew this also. Siri didn’t….or was commanded otherwise by Rosie. And yes,… it was that glaringly obvious that many actually believed Siri was under mandate by the FO to not be a rushing team.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

 

I blamed the D for not getting a stop with over three minutes to play….to give us a chance. I blame Siri for having his head up his butt for the early part of the season offensive game plan. We are the top rushing team…..I knew we should be great at it….most knew this also. Siri didn’t….or was commanded otherwise by Rosie. And yes,… it was that glaringly obvious that many actually believed Siri was under mandate by the FO to not be a rushing team.

Lmao you love to blame everyone but the players on offense that are not executing.

Hopefully we have improved enough to cover that one score difference in the reigning SB champs through our growth improvement and self awareness.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Hopefully we have improved enough to cover that one score difference in the reigning SB champs through our growth improvement and self awareness.

That game was not nearly that close sad that you trying to push that narrative 

6 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Lmao you love to blame everyone but the players on offense that are not executing.

You love injury excuses. The Bucs game was tough for us on that front. Didn’t Goedert miss that game? New Oline across the board(Mailata played hurt but at RT). Siri hadn’t figured out we are the best rushing team yet. Good lessons for us. Losing to the best taught us some things about our identity. 

5 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

That game was not nearly that close sad that you trying to push that narrative 

If the D gets a stop with over three minutes to go…..do we? Or do we not have a chance to win the game?

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You love injury excuses.

Yup and the Bucs were missing like there entire secondary and wasn’t that like a Sherman 1st or 2nd game with them and he went out during it… 

If the offense you knows plays football the entire game we win that game not one qtr

I’ll put out the obvious that Brady could have scored again at the end instead of running the time out for their victory. So not only did the D not get a stop….they would have given up another score.

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Yup and the Bucs were missing like there entire secondary and wasn’t that like a Sherman 1st or 2nd game with them and he went out during it… 

If the offense you knows plays football the entire game we win that game not one qtr

No. They were missing their weakest corner. Which they had to sub for. Oh…nooooo

Like us losing Nelson and using McPhearson. What’s the dropoff level there? 

Their pass rush was abusing our Oline though

I think our Oline fairs much better against their front on a second go around.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

No. They were missing their weakest corner. Which they had to sub for. Oh…nooooo

Yea and Winfield didn’t play at S and Sherman wasn’t even on the team like a week…. 

Brady still picks us apart. But much tougher without Godwin and Brown. Fournette kicked butt in that game also. He won’t be a factor if we play them again.

Healthy Mailata at LT plays a much better game than he did against them last time. Lane actually plays this time. Dickerson has improved drastically. We embrace running the ball now. Wouldn’t it be an actual wise gameplan to keep Brady off the field?

Having Goedert could help the offense as well.

You know, center the offense a little less around Reagor

But yep, TB had struggles with their corner that covered Reagor. Wasn’t a big problem for them.

Reagor hasn’t turned out too great for us. Think we realize that now. But him starting obviously limited the offense. Not sure how you missed that. But blame Hurts anyway.

In a nutshell: we became physical. Started running the ball. That let our freakishly big Oline attack the D. Goedert and Stoll much more physical than Ertz. On  D we got rid of soft Wilson at LB for a very physical Edwards. Every D player is ready to play a physical style now.