Quez Watkins 6th rounder- 43catches 647 yards 1 td

Edwards- 3rd rounder- 34 catches 571 yards 3 tds 

How is Edwards getting credited as a starter for the raiders if Quez is only started cuz we have no one else???? 

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Wallace being hurt is why Epps was better Wallace was solid when he was healthy maybe not special… Dickerson was going to end up a starter it was only a matter of time and the fact Driscoll can start and play at a high level is a knock because we had Brooks who if even was healthy is out the door for us???

The pick isn’t bad just because we have someone ahead of the player look I know Howie has bad picks but Mayock wasn’t good either is the point 

  OK, Moreau is a starting TE, but Waller is better. Gellespie and Abram are a starting Caliber S but Moehrig is better... It works both ways...

     I will say Mayock did not do as well as I thought he would until Last year, his 3rd. 4 of the 6 players drafted are starters and Gillespie could start for us.

 

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Quez Watkins 6th rounder- 43catches 647 yards 1 td

Edwards- 3rd rounder- 34 catches 571 yards 3 tds 

How is Edwards getting credited as a starter for the raiders if Quez is only started cuz we have no one else???? 

OK I will give you Watkins.  What about Reagor? LOL

1 minute ago, stine said:

Gellespie and Abram are a starting Caliber S but Moehrig is better... It works both ways...

 

If they are starting caliber then why did they draft someone to replace one as the starter see the issue there

Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said:

If they are starting caliber then why did they draft someone to replace one as the starter see the issue there

  No, I see them drafting the best available player. Remember, the Raiders are 2-3 players away for contention. Eagles are like 8-9 away. Huge difference there.

1 minute ago, stine said:

  No, I see them drafting the best available player. Remember, the Raiders are 2-3 players away for contention. Eagles are like 8-9 away. Huge difference there.

Raiders barely snuck into the playoffs just like us raiders have a terrible defense and a meh offense. Think you are vastly overrated the Raiders compared to us. 

15 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Might have gotten him mistaken with different guy but #4 pick is a rotational end???? That’s success to you????

Ruggs isn’t playing and Arnette the CB is gone.

He got Maxx in the fourth that is leading them. Hunter Renfrow he picked up day three.

Lets move on BG.... I see your point as far as 2020 draft goes. A terrible draft from Mayok

  Hr has been doing the draft for a long time, so he has no excuse. We need to hit this year. That I think we can both agree on

 

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

He got Maxx in the fourth that is leading them. Hunter Renfrow he picked up day three.

Not saying Mike didn’t have some good picks but overall he wasn’t good.

by that logic Howie got Mailata, got Maddox 

Hell Josh Sweat had 7.5 sacks to Crosbys 8 

3 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Raiders barely snuck into the playoffs just like us raiders have a terrible defense and a meh offense. Think you are vastly overrated the Raiders compared to us. 

No way are the Eagles close to the Raiders depth on either side of the ball. They played in the second toughest division in the NFL and won 10 games. We Beat no play-off teams in the NFC east, one of the weakest divisions in the NFL. only reason we made the play-offs was the Schedule. You think our defense is as good as the Raiders?  Their offense is much better.

It has come to me now that pick 15 is the one we are selling.

We control 16 and 19. Basically looking at these teams left playing. If you want to get inside the top twenty you come through us.

Only 15 for sale

4 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Only 15 for sale

When was this announced?

Just now, joemas6 said:

When was this announced?

We are going to know who they are picking to trade up to get 15. So 16 would still be who we got at 15 anyway. We’d even know those two picks. Then it’s just pick 17 and 18. Before 19. We should have a real good read on that situation.trading pick 15 we can still know our two other first round picks. Could help us fleece somebody in the process.

14 minutes ago, stine said:

No way are the Eagles close to the Raiders depth on either side of the ball. They played in the second toughest division in the NFL and won 10 games. We Beat no play-off teams in the NFC east, one of the weakest divisions in the NFL. only reason we made the play-offs was the Schedule. You think our defense is as good as the Raiders?  Their offense is much better.

I’d say Derek Carr is the huge difference give us Carr and I’d say we look like a drastically different team. But rest of the roster raiders have some edges Eagles win some neither is overly impressive in my book 

7 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

We are going to know who they are picking to trade up to get 15. So 16 would still be who we got at 15 anyway. We’d even know those two picks. Then it’s just pick 17 and 18. Before 19. We should have a real good read on that situation.trading pick 15 we can still know our two other first round picks. Could help us fleece somebody in the process.

So it's a planet Ham theory,  nothing that was announced?

6 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I’d say Derek Carr is the huge difference give us Carr and I’d say we look like a drastically different team. But rest of the roster raiders have some edges Eagles win some neither is overly impressive in my book 

Agree for the most part. Raiders have an edge though.  The thing to look at was where both teams started 3 years ago.  Eagles going backwards,  Raiders getting better.   

Also... remember the Eagles have all the intangibles... Raiders had all the distractions.  

I would leave the TV guy for doing TV though. 

3 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

So it's a planet Ham theory,  nothing that was announced?

Rosie did go through the whole thought of trading back to get picks for next year in his presser.

  Next year is supposedly loaded with QBs. Not sure even one this year should be rated first round. But I’m looking at how we control the draft in our little certain area.

I’m feeling 80 percent we trade back one of our first round picks. By trading 15 we have a real good idea of whom will be there at 19 still. Theoretically trading our top pick but still getting our guys.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I’m feeling 80 percent we trade back one of our first round picks. By trading 15 we have a real good idea of whom will be there at 19 still. Theoretically trading our top pick but still getting our guys.

Think we all feel like there will be a trade back think Joe getting at the fact your saying it’s 15 like it’s some guarantee….I mean does it make a huge difference if we take pick 15 then trade pick 16 we would still know those two picks the only have 17-18 until we pick at 19.

I’m figuring we should be getting top 15 guys on the Big Board with the 16th and 19th picks. At 16 hopefully a top 10.

6 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Think we all feel like there will be a trade back think Joe getting at the fact your saying it’s 15 like it’s some guarantee….I mean does it make a huge difference if we take pick 15 then trade pick 16 we would still know those two picks the only have 17-18 until we pick at 19.

Doesn’t make much sense. Your going to know who they are trading up to 15 for. So your getting your guy at 16. Tiny but slightly cheaper pay. You are selling a slightly better pick as well. Selling 15 not 16. If they want to take our guy that we think massively slid….then we aren’t trading anyway. If we want the same guy….they won’t be so interested in 16 anyway.

https://heavy.com/sports/philadelphia-eagles/jalen-hurts-devonta-smith-2/?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Philadelphia Eagles Jan 20&utm_content=Philadelphia Eagles Jan 20+CID_a59a49a3cfde4e1f187fef9fd16c44f0&utm_source=Campaign Monitor&utm_term=Click here for all the details    YAY except for me reagor rides pine in a rotational role.Siri didn't go far enough(but he will when we draft a legit WR). Quez at #2 is a mere placeholder. I am happy to see Siri "coaching"

2 hours ago, stine said:

I asked my wife about King. Quote: He is always hurt. When he is healthy, his play is poor and causes stupid penalties. That is her opinion.... FWIW...

 

 BTW- My wife hates women Announcers! She says they don't know crap and shouldn't be on the field... She is fun to listen to about this stuff lol

Gotta love women with "spirit"

8 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Doesn’t make much sense. Your going to know who they are trading up to 15 for. So your getting your guy at 16. Tiny but slightly cheaper pay. You are selling a slightly better pick as well. Selling 15 not 16. If they want to take our guy that we think massively slid….then we aren’t trading anyway. If we want the same guy….they won’t be so interested in 16 anyway.

Makes perfect sense if we pick at 15 and trade 16th pick your idea of knowing the draft outcomes is the same.

my guess is numerous teams will be calling to see what we will sell picks for and the value for the 15th pick vs the 16th pick will be basically the same.  Soooo again your logic of it has to be 15th vs 16th doesn’t make sense he’ll we could trade 19th and use both 15 &16