3 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Texans definitely not going to trade him to a division rival lol 

if they get good enough picks they sure could… they would even have the added bonus if he still gets some type of suspension. 

1 minute ago, Cheesteakitis said:

if they get good enough picks they sure could… they would even have the added bonus if he still gets some type of suspension. 

I’d 99.99% guarantee Texans will refuse to trade him to the Colts. They would take a slightly lesser offer from any other team first 

5 minutes ago, Cheesteakitis said:

if they get good enough picks they sure could… they would even have the added bonus if he still gets some type of suspension. 

What picks do the Colts have?  

Lol media is all over the place with the Eagles and Watson. Some saying we have no interest and have moved on the others saying we are still inquiring about him. 

57 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Lol media is all over the place with the Eagles and Watson. Some saying we have no interest and have moved on the others saying we are still inquiring about him. 

They " called it" ... this way they put it out there and make themselves seem knowledgeable and important.   

Rosie been studying all up in the Watson situation. Now that no charges are pressed …he’s not interested? Right

Panthers might go crazy here. Not sure where the cutoff is for this trade. If he comes in and performs like a top five QB……that’s worth three firsts and three seconds

I was looking forward to adding a bunch of young talent in this draft. Watson is going to eat up a bunch of that.

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Panthers might go crazy here. Not sure where the cutoff is for this trade. If he comes in and performs like a top five QB……that’s worth three firsts and three seconds

Was Watson a top 5 QB before?    What success did the team have?    You want to give away your 1st two picks for 3 consecutive years for that?  Carolina is that good elsewhere?  

Who are your top 5 QBs?   Would you trade three firsts and three seconds for all those guys?

I believe Watson is one of the most dangerous weapons in the NFL. Pure athletics and on the field play? I think he can stand up to anybody.

Just now, joemas6 said:

Who are your top 5 QBs?   Would you trade three firsts and three seconds for all those guys?

You think that price too high for a top QB in his prime? What’s a top five QB worth to you(max)?

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You think that price too high for a top QB in his prime? What’s a top five QB worth to you(max)?

My question to you.   For these teams... for who would you give the first 2 picks in your next 3 drafts.    

My answer ...  Watson didn't win did he.   Idk...  do you want to win, or just have a good QB?    Who are the WRs he has played with so far?   Mahomes... how did he look in the SB last year... how did he produce in games Kelce or Hill missed.  

It's a team sport... if other pieces are in place and you want to give up picks like that....sure, it can make sense.  For a team that needs a ton of help...not so much.

9 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You think that price too high for a top QB in his prime? What’s a top five QB worth to you(max)?

My answer to this.. it's different for each team.  Where are they.  Denver,  it was a good move, they have other pieces in place...WRs, defense...  QB is the issue there.   With a team like Carolina... they are decent, I don't think you give an extra 1st and 2nd to what Denver did though.

For the Eagles... they need everything. The big factor people miss...the positions they are solid... Slay, Cox, Kelce, Lane... older guys.  You can really build around them.  That's more pieces that you need, and you give away 6 premium picks plus the cap space?     I don't see it.  Not for winning a SB.  Fantasy maybe...highlights sure... Superbowl no.

Meant to say...you can't build around the old guys.

10 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

My question to you.   For these teams... for who would you give the first 2 picks in your next 3 drafts.    

My answer ...  Watson didn't win did he.   Idk...  do you want to win, or just have a good QB?    Who are the WRs he has played with so far?   Mahomes... how did he look in the SB last year... how did he produce in games Kelce or Hill missed.  

It's a team sport... if other pieces are in place and you want to give up picks like that....sure, it can make sense.  For a team that needs a ton of help...not so much.

Watson isn’t a one year rental. Draft isn’t the only way

21 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

My question to you.   For these teams... for who would you give the first 2 picks in your next 3 drafts.    

My answer ...  Watson didn't win did he.   Idk...  do you want to win, or just have a good QB?    Who are the WRs he has played with so far?   Mahomes... how did he look in the SB last year... how did he produce in games Kelce or Hill missed.  

It's a team sport... if other pieces are in place and you want to give up picks like that....sure, it can make sense.  For a team that needs a ton of help...not so much.

Watson won their division in 2019

22 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

My question to you.   For these teams... for who would you give the first 2 picks in your next 3 drafts.    

My answer ...  Watson didn't win did he.   Idk...  do you want to win, or just have a good QB?    Who are the WRs he has played with so far?   Mahomes... how did he look in the SB last year... how did he produce in games Kelce or Hill missed.  

It's a team sport... if other pieces are in place and you want to give up picks like that....sure, it can make sense.  For a team that needs a ton of help...not so much.

So only trade for Tom Brady if you have a great team. Don’t try and build around him or think longer term. Giving up picks hurts. No doubt. If we spent all three first rounders on QBs would we get one better than Watson? I don’t think so.

18 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

My answer to this.. it's different for each team.  Where are they.  Denver,  it was a good move, they have other pieces in place...WRs, defense...  QB is the issue there.   With a team like Carolina... they are decent, I don't think you give an extra 1st and 2nd to what Denver did though.

For the Eagles... they need everything. The big factor people miss...the positions they are solid... Slay, Cox, Kelce, Lane... older guys.  You can really build around them.  That's more pieces that you need, and you give away 6 premium picks plus the cap space?     I don't see it.  Not for winning a SB.  Fantasy maybe...highlights sure... Superbowl no.

Meant to say...you can't build around the old guys.

We have three firsts this year. Give up all three or even better give up one each year. We do need more pieces. But there are other ways. Ideally you draft a stud QB and role with his rookie cap the first four years. Have we ever had a QB of Watson’s level?

Three first and three seconds is the max I can conceive. It would hurt for sure.

Two firsts and two seconds I’m not even hesitating.

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Two firsts and two seconds I’m not even hesitating.

For Watson? Given this roster that's too much for any player. 

Texans won the division in 2018 also. 

someone is smoking crack!!! let watson stay in the massage parlor 

1 minute ago, UK_EaglesFan89 said:

For Watson? Given this roster that's too much for any player. 

You could be right. We could use more Dillard, Reagor and JJAW. 

3 minutes ago, UK_EaglesFan89 said:

For Watson? Given this roster that's too much for any player. 

You could look at it as Wentz and the trade back for Smith ….that’s two first rounders right there. Think we got a third not a second for a Wentz….but pretty close.

I’ve been leaning away from giving up all our picks and rolling with Hurts. Seems like I was by far in the minority