Here's the snap counts.

https://www.bleedinggreennation.com/2020/10/5/21502027/eagles-vs-49ers-snap-counts-travis-fulgham-impact-debut-philadelphia-jordan-mailata-genard-avery-wr

Some thoughts.

The team isn't getting much from Scott and even less from Clement. I wish they would give Holyfield a chance. Huntley hasn't even played and Killins was underwhelming.

Avery, Singleton and Strap all made impact plays despite not getting many snaps. I like Avery as a situational pass rusher but Singleton and Strap have earned more playing time.

For those begging for a 3wr offense, you got it. Rodgers only played 35 percent of the snaps, but had a good game.

We played seven DBs. Strap and NRC both played 40 percent of the snaps. Epps and Wallace split time at SS. Will have to wait for the film to see how each guy did. We know how Epps did on one play, though. Aiyuck? Jesus.

Fulgham getting more snaps than Burnett was a surprise, but he made them count. He could be a keeper.   

8 hours ago, jsb235 said:

The difference between Edwards and Singleton versus Riley and Gerry is that they miss fewer tackles and lay better zone coverage. The only possible reason you play Gerry and Riley is because they are better in man coverage, which they aren't, so they shouldn't be out there.

The difference between them is that Gerryband stiles are out there more to get exposed vs Edwards and Singletary.

Im all for making the change but I don’t think they will be better they will just be exposed like Gerry and Riley 

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Come on now maybe the depth but it was literally throw right to him didn’t need much recognition literally anyone could have made that play.

How many interceptions would Gerry have if his positioning was better? How many pass breakups would he have? How many additional sacks would the defense have if Gerry weren't consistently in the wrong place, leaving guys wide open?

2 minutes ago, jsb235 said:

We played seven DBs. Strap and NRC both played 40 percent of the snaps. Epps and Wallace split time at SS. Will have to wait for the film to see how each guy did. We know how Epps did on one play, though. Aiyuck? Jesus.

 

Wallace looked like a rookie in his first start from the plays I noticed got beat a few times missed some tackles 

1 minute ago, jsb235 said:

How many interceptions would Gerry have if his positioning was better? How many pass breakups would he have? How many additional sacks would the defense have if Gerry weren't consistently in the wrong place, leaving guys wide open?

Lmao I agree Gerry isn’t good and is on the field 99% of the snaps to get exposed.... Put Edwards out there for 99% of snaps or Singletary will see them get exposed as well for there lack of coverage ability 

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

The difference between them is that Gerryband stiles are out there more to get exposed vs Edwards and Singletary.

Im all for making the change but I don’t think they will be better they will just be exposed like Gerry and Riley 

To me the difference is really clear. They may make as many bad plays, but both guys are consistently in position to make good ones, so you get some upside with the downside. How many impact plays did Gerry and Riley make? Edwards had two really nice tackles, and Singleton had an INT and two tackles for a loss. That's five impact plays on 33 snaps. Riley and Gerry had at most two such plays on 109 snaps. That's the difference. 

1 minute ago, jsb235 said:

They may make as many bad plays, but both guys are consistently in position to make good ones

Because they play for a qtr of the snaps lol.... And if they make as many bad plays they aren’t better... Just getting exposed differently 

1 minute ago, jsb235 said:

How many impact plays did Gerry and Riley make?

Off my head Gerry had a great tackle for a loss...Also had a pretty good tackle on Kittle who A. isnt easy to bring down and B. Like 4 other defenders missed tsckles on...Thougg guess he did get called for the weakest face mask ever didn’t even grab it barely touched it while Kittle was punching him in the face 

5 minutes ago, jsb235 said:

Edwards had two really nice tackles, and Singleton had an INT and two tackles for a loss

Edwards got credit for a single TFL and Singletary was credited with zero and had an int handed to him....

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Off my head Gerry had a great tackle for a loss...Also had a pretty good tackle on Kittle who A. isnt easy to bring down and B. Like 4 other defenders missed tsckles on...Thougg guess he did get called for the weakest face mask ever didn’t even grab it barely touched it while Kittle was punching him in the face 

I remember two good plays for him and zero for Riley. In over 100 snaps. If that's good enough for you, fine. But Edwards and Riley will give you 10 times that amount with almost no drop off in coverage ability in man and vastly better coverage in zone. 

3 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Edwards got credit for a single TFL and Singletary was credited with zero and had an int handed to him....

He had two. The film will show it. As far as the INT being handed to him, if that's your argument why he shouldn't play, find a better argument.

3 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Edwards got credit for a single TFL and Singletary was credited with zero and had an int handed to him....

One of Edwards' good plays was an open field tackle for a yard that, had it been Riley or Gerry, would have been a huge play since they can't tackle.

1 minute ago, jsb235 said:

But Edwards and Riley will give you 10 times that amount with almost no drop off in coverage ability in man and vastly better coverage in zone. 

This is where I disagree I’m not ok with it but I don’t think Edwards/Singletary will be any better just exposed different.

I remember one great play from the two the tackle for a loss by Edwards.... I’m sorry not overly impressed with an INT a QB throw right at a guy 

Watching highlights of the game that man Epps was really laying the lumber on some hits... kinda limited with the highlights but seemed to be involved in a few nice tackles.

Watching the highlights of SF and I’ll watch the all 22 later when it drops but if I had to say my two Lbs right now I’d go Gerry/Edwards.... Truly I’d rather go both rookies but that isn’t going to happen 

5 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Watching highlights of the game that man Epps was really laying the lumber on some hits... kinda limited with the highlights but seemed to be involved in a few nice tackles.

I am hoping that Epps and Wallace continue to get snaps at SS. To me, the long-term future of the secondary is somewhat coming into focus, Mills, Slay and LeBlanc at corner, Epps/Wallace at SS/third safety, Maddox at FS. Of that group, Mills and LeBlanc are free agents, but you can probably sign both guys for reasonable deals. Throw in James, Arnold (or Riley) and a few draft picks, and I think we have a decent group.

Eliot Shorr-Parks

 

@EliotShorrParks

 

Jalen Mills showed his value last night. Moved to CB and played a strong game. Remains an extremely underrated player #Eagles

Eliot Shorr-Parks

 

@EliotShorrParks

 

#Eagles quarterback hits vs. 49ers: 1) Genard Avery: 5 2) Derek Barnett: 2 3) Malik Jackson: 2

Avery has a game seemed to be around the QB all game still not a full time starter but he definitely has a niche he is good at 

Again still think doesn’t get enough credit Stout is a hell of a OL coach... he might honestly be the best at least top 5 

Roster moves keep Fulgham think with time him and Wentz can be a deadly duo.... Honestly think Killins over Huntley think we can use Killins in more creative ways plus extra value at a rb/we 

11 hours ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Think Edwards looks good because we use him as a run defender and Singleton honestly one good play that Noticed and it was literally handed to him.... Now to be fair don’t think Gerry or Riley are better  but not sure I see them as improvements(maybe Edwards) 

What the hell does that have to do with Berthard and Jimmy G 

There were 2 things combined,read the OTHER ONE lol

9 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Roster moves keep Fulgham think with time him and Wentz can be a deadly duo.... Honestly think Killins over Huntley think we can use Killins in more creative ways plus extra value at a rb/we 

IDK why Killins was changed to a WR. Maybe because we had no WR's lol. But he is a RB!!! He should be used like we used Sproles.I think making him a WR is a mistake(although he CAN catch out of the backfield).Stop trying to make guys move to positions they don't play.it's useless. Killins is NOT a WR, he is a RB,let him play the position he KNOWS.This is/was a bad decision and although he is as fast as Ruggs, it will take him awhile to learn being a WR.let him play RB,run patterns out of the backfield,but PLEASE,he's not TRAINED as a WR(and we have guys for that) Used CORRECTLY Killins can be a weapon,but we're F ing that up too  and ruining a possibly good player in the meantime.Not many make a successful transition.We have seen QB's go to WR and they all fail.WHY "untrain" this guy from all he has learned at RB? Stupid

4 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

he's not TRAINED as a WR(and we have guys for that)

He spent camp playing training as a WR has natural hands and everything I see him do was things we did with Sproles.... Sproles lined up a ton in the slot and motion especially early in his career and with the Saints.

But I would also use him out the backfield hence my replace him with Huntley 

7 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

We have seen QB's go to WR and they all fail.

Greg Ward QB transition to WR took some time sure but pretty good great hands smart guy...If your Killins just finding ways on the field is his best route take what he can get and produce 

Think we throw around the phrase use a player like Sproles to loosely.... Sproles was bout getting him in space he was excellent out the backfield yes but was also very good slot WR and KR/PR.... Basically anyway you can get Sproles with little bit of daylight to make a play he more often then not made them 

54 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

He spent camp playing training as a WR has natural hands and everything I see him do was things we did with Sproles.... Sproles lined up a ton in the slot and motion especially early in his career and with the Saints.

But I would also use him out the backfield hence my replace him with Huntley 

LMAo "trained" for 2 months when he was a RB for years? Why not work with our WR's to get them "trained" I'm not gonna argue with you he was a RUNNING BACK in HS and college(I watched him play personally)