Just now, joemas6 said:

Watch the film....you like to do that.    Tell me how you beat Mailata?    What was exposed?  

I never said it actually was with Mailata, Hurts running or our WRs. But that’s my actual concern going forward the most.

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You just wrote a long post that was every bit wrong. Too bad they don’t have scoring on this site. You’d get a minus 7 ….one take away for each false point.

Break down each sentence and point out how it's wrong. Only negative I see is your IQ

15 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

At 29 points against the Texans is exactly what I’m saying is pretty much irrelevant. Your way of brushing off any individual weaknesses that might have been exposed. If they showed how to beat Mailata will that be a real issue going forward? Or you think it doesn’t matter because we still put up 29 against Texans? They stopped Hurts runs. They stopped our WR. I can come up with plenty of excuses…starting with the crap Thursday night game scheduling. All I care about here is if real weakness was exposed. If a certain technique works against our player. Sure we still put up 29…not what I’m even talking about at all.

Siri admitted Mailata got beat because of calls HE made??? Did you read that or not???? Didn't last long there did it? Siri adjusted

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

They are better than KC? Buffalo? The Vikes only have 1 loss(to us remarkably) but they can't beat us? Only game I feel we could lose is Vs Dullaz at AT&T. The rest of the division also has easy schedules OUTSIDE the division,so that makes them the best? I will respectfully disagree

I didn't even understand what Ham is trying to say with Dallas, Minnesota or Giants?

I know mathematics tells me they are the teams that can catch us for a 1 seed.

I also know those teams all play each other.  Minnesota has Buffalo coming up.  Dallas is going to Green Bay, who us going to be desperate for a win.  

Giants have a nice record... if you watched the games, they have been very fortunate.  Their fans will tell you that.  Idk they make the playoffs.  

But,  I'm letting it all play out, too much anticipation of negative stuff.  8-0...with 4 game lead on 11 NFC teams, still people can't enjoy it? 

9 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

I'm going to be like you and not look at any links...  

I'll ask you who you think has the best shot in the NFC to beat us in the playoffs.   To me... Giants, Minnesota and Dallas are not those teams.    They happen to be mathematically the teams that can catch us during the regular season...  but come playoff time, I would be more concerned about some other teams.  Tampa and SF are two of those. 

I'm not ready to say we can beat the VIkes again. While that was an amazing game,I doubt they will fold like they did the first time

8 minutes ago, Senhorcook said:

At halftime I was very unsure. And disappointed. But they got the interceptions and momentum changed.

Yeah that pick at the 3 really changed things.It could have been 29/24(5) with 3 mins left) IDK that +14 turnover ratio  ever hurt any team. 

5 minutes ago, Senhorcook said:

At halftime I was very unsure. And disappointed. But they got the interceptions and momentum changed.

Unsure....meaning you needed it to be like what almost guaranteed?   At what point were you thinking it's probable they were going to lose?

Or was it the greed of it needing to be guaranteed?   At a tie score you weren't sure... what is wrong with that?  That’s how it should be.   Nothing should be guaranteed. 

5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Siri admitted Mailata got beat because of calls HE made??? Did you read that or not???? Didn't last long there did it? Siri adjusted

Not only that but you have to wonder how much the shoulder and brace are limiting his punch

12 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You just wrote a long post that was every bit wrong. Too bad they don’t have scoring on this site. You’d get a minus 7 ….one take away for each false point.

Great post,now lay out sentence by sentence where it's "wrong"

For me....down vs Jax was the only time that I would have thought we were going to lose.

Thinking we are going to lose...is different than not being sure we are going to win.

I think we have gotten greedy as a fan bass now...we want the guarantee right from the start. 

Oh no, without an interception, we would only be ahead by 5 and have the ball with 2 minutes... oh the fear of that...lol.  

You got the ball with 2 minutes left and a 5 point lead.. you should take that every time.  Odds are in your favor by far !

Just now, Asg 15 said:

Not only that but you have to wonder how much the shoulder and brace are limiting his punch

I'm sure he wasn't 100%, but Siri called plays where he was to block inside.of course you're going to get beat outside doing that. That was 2 plays in a row as I recall. Siri realized that was mistake and fixed it. We probably won't see that again. part of growing as a coach

For me the best thing about Thursday is they didn't play close to their best game and still won by 2 TDs

Eagles teams in past years played down to the competition

16 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

They are better than KC? Buffalo? The Vikes only have 1 loss(to us remarkably) but they can't beat us? Only game I feel we could lose is Vs Dullaz at AT&T. The rest of the division also has easy schedules OUTSIDE the division,so that makes them the best? I will respectfully disagree

In the NFC I think we are the best of the bunch is what I'm saying. 

7 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I have a super long essay I can write if you want Ham(really tired of talking about Wentz again) But YOu were the ONLY one who saw things? Oh please!!! You don't believe the decision to lose Wentz was made the instant we drafted Hurts? You can't see this???  No you were late to that game so stop with the "I called it BS" You didn't "preach to run the ball" you were pom pomming that HURTS was running it. Difference. Our WR room wasn't average,yet you clammored on and on for Reagor. Even Ertz didn't know he was getting traded mid season?? Did you call that? Nope,we all suspected he could be AFTER the season,so more spin. You also don't think the decision to rebuild the entire team didn't start at the end of the SB year??? You weren't the only one,you just CLAIM to be.I can write that super long essay if thats what it takes lol. All we hear is how GREAT HURTS is running the ball. That is not what we had in mind when we say "run the ball"

I don’t believe the decision to ax Wentz was made by drafting Hurts. I mean really, a second round pick at Qb you think is a clear cut successor?

I didn’t preach to run the ball? I was yelling to the roof tops to run the ball. Siri said his approach first game against Dallas was Shootout…stupid. I started off that offseason talking about how huge a season I believed Sanders would have. That part I was actually wrong about. But clearly shows one part of how I expected our approach of being run based.

 I didn’t clamor on and on for Reagor. False. I did mention him. I did identify our need for outside speed considering all we had was two TEs that were great. But my idea was trade back and get a WR from this loaded class. Reagor was one of seven draftee names I mentioned as being available in that trade back scenario. Bunch of good WRs went later not counting Jefferson. I was wrong to mention Reagor in my list of seven choices. That I beat the drum for Reagor is false.

We all knew Ertz was being traded. Happened later than we even expected. We’ll all of us but you evidently.

 The decision to rebuild the team didn’t remotely get started after that SB. In fact Rosie got caught with his still in the same cookie jar in 2020.

 All we hear is how great Hurts is at running the ball? Really…I mean really. How false is this? I’ve tried to express how many things he brings to the table as a leader. Ever heard me speak about the INTANGIBLES? Evidently you heard one of it. I’ve been seeing Hurts throws sone absolutely incredible balls this year also.

 Can’t continue doing this for you all the time. Too exhausting….clearly pointless also. Just total BS…crap post. But since you asked I indulged once again.

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

Oh no, without an interception, we would only be ahead by 5 and have the ball with 2 minutes... oh the fear of that...lol.  

Well you can't say that doesn't happen. If momentum shifts you can blow a 10 point lead pretty easily

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

I'm sure he wasn't 100%, but Siri called plays where he was to block inside.of course you're going to get beat outside doing that. That was 2 plays in a row as I recall. Siri realized that was mistake and fixed it. We probably won't see that again. part of growing as a coach

I'm not sure I understand this? I didn't watch... did Mailata get beat by a guy that he didn't attempt to block?

If that's the case,then what is the issue?  If it wasn't his assignment how could he get beat?

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Well you can't say that doesn't happen. If momentum shifts you can blow a 10 point lead pretty easily

You have the ball with 2 minutes and a  point lead.  They have to stop you from getting a first down and then score a TD.    That puts the odds in your favor by a lot.

3 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

I'm not sure I understand this? I didn't watch... did Mailata get beat by a guy that he didn't attempt to block?

If that's the case,then what is the issue?  If it wasn't his assignment how could he get beat?

Not a defense whiz here.but it looked to me like he was supposed to chip block Hughes then move inside to block someone else for a run play,but their outside guy came around the outside because the chip block wasnt enough to slow him down. After those 2 plays where he got beat twice,Siri stopped that and let him do the job he should have done 

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

You have the ball with 2 minutes and a  point lead.  They have to stop you from getting a first down and then score a TD.    That puts the odds in your favor by a lot.

You never see 3 and outs and the other team drive for the game winning FG? After a 3 and out,if they had scored instead of us getting the pick at the 3,there was 3 minutes lef(I believe). The final first down was the key to the win,but we had just done a 3 and out on the previous series

6 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I don’t believe the decision to ax Wentz was made by drafting Hurts

Nope, it was made before that and why we drafted Hurts. Howie saw in the SB he didn't need a prolfic QB with a crap attitude,he needed a game manager and better players around him. Foles showed him that

8 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

hat part I was actually wrong about. But clearly shows one part of how I expected our approach of being run based.

But you didn't blame your god Hurts for that lack of letting the RB's run?

9 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I didn’t clamor on and on for Reagor. False.

OMG this is BS to the 1,000,000,000th power We argued for PAGES on end(I wanted JJ like every other sane person on the planet). Your statement is the false one

We paid Wentz after that. Not sure what larger a sign you need to disprove your point.

11 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

That I beat the drum for Reagor is false

🤣

12 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I’ve been seeing Hurts throws sone absolutely incredible balls this year also

Yes that's what we ALL wanted to see. We just weren't "assuming" he could pass,we wanted to SEE IT HAPPEN. But we're haters LMAO

13 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Can’t continue doing this for you all the time. Too exhausting….clearly pointless also. Just total BS…crap post. But since you asked I indulged once again

And I pointed out how wrong you are yet again. Don't you ever tire of being wrong?

5 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

We paid Wentz after that. Not sure what larger a sign you need to disprove your point.

Who else did we have that we could pay??? Sudfeld? Have to pay someone? You don't sign your SB QB?(or should I say the guy that got us there)

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Yes that's what we ALL wanted to see. We just weren't "assuming" he could pass,we wanted to SEE IT HAPPEN. But we're haters LMAO

And I pointed out how wrong you are yet again. Don't you ever tire of being wrong?

Clearly pointed out how your entire rant was false. Give it up!