Watched the Cin-Ten game. For the most part Henry was doubled and Cin had to play man. Henry will get his but he can be limited.

Saints pick back up to #7.   

Would be great to cement that #1 seed vs them week 17 by giving them another loss.

1 hour ago, mjkline1958 said:

Watched the Cin-Ten game. For the most part Henry was doubled and Cin had to play man. Henry will get his but he can be limited.

Cincy has better linebackers

If you look at the stats the game shouldn't have been close

140 yards passing and 107 on the ground shouldn't make 33 points

34 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Saints pick back up to #7.   

Would be great to cement that #1 seed vs them week 17 by giving them another loss.

Thought it was weird they could not even put up a FG. TB,Atl,Cleveland then us

28 minutes ago, Asg 15 said:

If you look at the stats the game shouldn't have been close

140 yards passing and 107 on the ground shouldn't make 33 points

special teams had something to do with it

18 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Thought it was weird they could not even put up a FG. TB,Atl,Cleveland then us

All 4 can beat them. Question is will they?

32 minutes ago, stine said:

special teams had something to do with it

All 4 can beat them. Question is will they?

Yes ST gave up 172 yards,that has to stop pronto

36 minutes ago, stine said:

special teams had something to do with it

All 4 can beat them. Question is will they?

Weird game,they put up 0,but held SF to 13(not easy to do that). I think TB will be too much for them,they could beat Atl,probably a close loss to Cleve. Don't see them beating us,so they have their work cut out for them. So if they go 1-3 we should be in good shape pick wise

18 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Weird game,they put up 0,but held SF to 13(not easy to do that). I think TB will be too much for them,they could beat Atl,probably a close loss to Cleve. Don't see them beating us,so they have their work cut out for them. So if they go 1-3 we should be in good shape pick wise

Funny thing is ATL is still in the mix to win the division. So they should be focused to play.   

As for the SF game...it looks like they turned the ball over a few times in the red zone... that occupies the clock with longer drives,so makes sense the scoring was low. 

 The Tampa loss to Cleveland really might help that pick stay high.  Let's hope.  

52 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Funny thing is ATL is still in the mix to win the division. So they should be focused to play.   

As for the SF game...it looks like they turned the ball over a few times in the red zone... that occupies the clock with longer drives,so makes sense the scoring was low. 

 The Tampa loss to Cleveland really might help that pick stay high.  Let's hope.  

I think TB is winning the division with a losing record? 

1 hour ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Weird game,they put up 0,but held SF to 13(not easy to do that). I think TB will be too much for them,they could beat Atl,probably a close loss to Cleve. Don't see them beating us,so they have their work cut out for them. So if they go 1-3 we should be in good shape pick wise

except they have 5 more games....

1 hour ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Weird game,they put up 0,but held SF to 13(not easy to do that). I think TB will be too much for them,they could beat Atl,probably a close loss to Cleve. Don't see them beating us,so they have their work cut out for them. So if they go 1-3 we should be in good shape pick wise

  I admit I am wrong more often then right on here, But I did actually call this one correct before the season started. I said between 4 & 8 wins at most. More than likely somewhere in the middle. I was hit with many saying they thought NO would be over 8 and compete for the division. Some had them as winners. Anyway, here I am, patting myself on the back because I know it won't happen again lol

38 minutes ago, stine said:

  I admit I am wrong more often then right on here, But I did actually call this one correct before the season started. I said between 4 & 8 wins at most. More than likely somewhere in the middle. I was hit with many saying they thought NO would be over 8 and compete for the division. Some had them as winners. Anyway, here I am, patting myself on the back because I know it won't happen again lol

Man.  How about being dead on in the numbers....yet Saints still can win the division....lol.   

Really the NFC south teams are the ones to watch here....3 of the Saints 5 games are vs those teams... and the records, along with Cleveland are similar enough to where it can change the pick. 

20 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Now... this is where I ask Ham... does he think in the playoffs the opponent is going to let Hurts run like this?

I say no. It's different when allowing him run ends your season.  

I think allowing him to run probably did end the Packs season. Chance at postseason anyway.

19 hours ago, UK_EaglesFan89 said:

GB WRs are not that good. Rodgers has a broken thumb and their defense isn't very good. We should be out of sight and yet it isn't. 

Except for that rookie Watson. That kid looks fantastic. Gardner-Johnson hit him with his shoulder with a big hit. Like hitting a brick wall. Not only did he hold onto the ball but left our S crumbled in agony.

3 hours ago, stine said:

except they have 5 more games....

Yeah but by then the pick is set. 1 game wont matter much maybe 1 spot

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Except for that rookie Watson. That kid looks fantastic. Gardner-Johnson hit him with his shoulder with a big hit. Like hitting a brick wall. Not only did he hold onto the ball but left our S crumbled in agony.

Yeah, one of my picks for us. Took him awhile to break out, but he's another Kupp

1 hour ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Yeah but by then the pick is set. 1 game wont matter much maybe 1 spot

You never know... one game could be 4 or 5 spots

Anyway glad we won. I said before this was a game we could very well lose. SO happy we pulled out the W

We began the season w/ the so called 2nd easiest schedule. Now I only see 2 easy games left on the schedule

8 minutes ago, mjkline1958 said:

We began the season w/ the so called 2nd easiest schedule. Now I only see 2 easy games left on the schedule

Don't forget we lost an "easy game" and almost lost a second

Wow does Matt Ryan look awful... in a where I just don’t need the Steelers D to have a huge game...  he looks like  deer in headlights...with about 10 hunters pointing shotguns at him.   Brutal. 

3 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Wow does Matt Ryan look awful... in a where I just don’t need the Steelers D to have a huge game...  he looks like  deer in headlights...with about 10 hunters pointing shotguns at him.   Brutal. 

Yeah, he looked terrible. Maybe the Panthers will trade them Mayfield And I know a QB who is out of a job in NY lol

3 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Wow does Matt Ryan look awful... in a where I just don’t need the Steelers D to have a huge game...  he looks like  deer in headlights...with about 10 hunters pointing shotguns at him.   Brutal.