Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Any player that doesn’t play has a much higher percentage of being healthy for the postseason, agreed there?

What if they want to play? So you're fine sitting Hurts even if he's healthy for the remaining games,because we already in post season. No sense getting him hurt. We can win from the wild card spot

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So Houston should have sent everyone home 5 weeks ago. I mean it's pointless to play guys you are paying 15 million dollars to

Why? What’s at risk?

Not risking them not being healthy for postsesson

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Up 40-0 in the fourth. Do you still risk everybody?

Just trying to figure out your stance here.

My stance is you play the starters to get that 40-0 lead?????

What are you saving the Houston players for? Makes no sense your argument here.

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

My stance is you play the starters to get that 40-0 lead?????

Where is the line?

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Why? What’s at risk?

Not risking them not being healthy for postsesson

They should send them all home,have the players refund their checks and come back next season

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

My stance is you play the starters to get that 40-0 lead?????

How about playing your starters to get the one seed?

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

What are you saving the Houston players for? Makes no sense your argument here.

Where is the line?

Players want to PLAY??? Thats the line,not what YOU think they should do. Athletes want to PLAY and they get PAID to PLAY.IDK whats so hard about this?

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

How about playing your starters to get the one seed?

Why? You are putting them at risk according to you

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

What if they want to play? So you're fine sitting Hurts even if he's healthy for the remaining games,because we already in post season. No sense getting him hurt. We can win from the wild card spot

I consider it. Rust is also a consideration. Momentum. Whether the player wants to play isn’t a huge concern. What’s best for the franchise. Business.

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

They should send them all home,have the players refund their checks and come back next season

Teams that suck maybe should have to be penalized some of their checks.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I consider it. Rust is also a consideration. Momentum. Whether the player wants to play isn’t a huge concern. What’s best for the franchise. Business.

OK I want to record you going into the locker room next week and telling the starters they aren't going to play for awhile. I need to record this

4 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

My stance is you play the starters to get that 40-0 lead?????

What about 20-0 with two minutes left

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Players want to PLAY??? Thats the line,not what YOU think they should do. Athletes want to PLAY and they get PAID to PLAY.IDK whats so hard about this?

Why? You are putting them at risk according to you

Risk to accomplish goals. If you have the one seed then what are you risking for?

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

What about 20-0 with two minutes left

What about it? What if it's 3-0 with 2 minutes left?

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

OK I want to record you going into the locker room next week and telling the starters they aren't going to play for awhile. I need to record this

I’d do that no problem if that’s the decision. Boss tells employees what to do. Don’t care much for feelings. 

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Risk to accomplish goals. If you have the one seed then what are you risking for?

Players goals are to PLAY,to get STATS,so they can make more MONEY. Sitting won't accomplish that. Why do you think we play Sanders so much?? Contract year maybe???

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I’d do that no problem if that’s the decision. Boss tells employees what to do. Don’t care much for feelings. 

Great way to destroy your team spirit LOL

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

What about it? What if it's 3-0 with 2 minutes left?

They other team can still win at 3-0…duh. The point is once you accomplish your goal ….you’re done. Not FL goal of 32 points. The goal of winning. Getting top seed. Win division. Then postseason you all in.

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

What about it? What if it's 3-0 with 2 minutes left?

You can’t see the difference where 3-0 you don’t accomplish the goal yet?

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

They other team can still win at 3-0…duh. The point is once you accomplish your goal ….you’re done. Not FL goal of 32 points. The goal of winning. Getting top seed. Win division. Then postseason you all in.

So players get paid to take risks? Thanks for proving my point

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Players goals are to PLAY,to get STATS,so they can make more MONEY. Sitting won't accomplish that. Why do you think we play Sanders o much?? Contract year maybe???

Great way to destroy your team spirit LOL

We play Sanders because he’s by far the best back. Big dropoff otherwise.Doing what’s best for the franchise. Driving up Sanders price isn’t coach goals.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Not FL goal of 32 points

Actually we're not far off that,but you said it was no possible HAHAHA(Thanks again for another point proven)

You’re in fantasy football world. Like it’s all about stats, really? What planet you on? It’s about winning!! Winning!

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

We play Sanders because he’s by far the best back. Big dropoff otherwise.Doing what’s best for the franchise. Driving up Sanders price isn’t coach goals.

How do you know? last year he had zero TD's. Why not use Scott et al and save Sanders? IDK how good Scott would be unless we play him

4 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You can’t see the difference where 3-0 you don’t accomplish the goal yet?

So it's ok to risk your players then??? could be 1 snap too many?

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Actually we're not far off that,but you said it was no possible HAHAHA(Thanks again for another point proven)

I didn’t really say anything about whether it was possible. I don’t care that much about just O stats…you get it? I care about winning! Win the game. Defense / ST I don’t care that much how! Sports is about winners! Did you ever play any sport?

You going in the boxing ring to try and lab 100 jabs? Heck no! Win the fight!

I'm not paying millions to guys to sit,thats why I have BU's that don't make the same money. The starters have know the risks ever since they started pee wee's. They play because they love the game

Olympics….bobsled. You risking all to do the fastest time possible? Or doing what it takes to win?

We have a huge divide in our thinking on this

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I didn’t really say anything about whether it was possible. I don’t care that much about just O stats…you get it? I care about winning! Win the game. Defense / ST I don’t care that much how! Sports is about winners! Did you ever play any sport?

You going in the boxing ring to try and lab 100 jabs? Heck no! Win the fight!

Winners win because they take risks???? That's what makes them winners and they get paid more?