1 hour ago, Asg 15 said:

The pick 6 was a rookie mistake. Not whai i expect of someone with his experience

LOL maybe, but he has played TWO actual games in 2 years(this was his third) A little rusty maybe from non use??? Tough to stay sharp and "on your game" when you never play and Latt has set up other QB's. He's good at it. 

7 minutes ago, EaglesTD123 said:

https://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/news/giants-vs-eagles-will-be-sunday-at-425-pm-week-18-2022

Home game,we're going down. We can't play at home

13 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Home game,we're going down. We can't play at home

Go away Hater

I'm trying to think positive here lol

7 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Wait..... a rookie ....one.... single player... " clearly swings us to victory "  over the Saints? 

One rookie safety would have been the difference?   Really?   That's really what you think?   

Wait..... a rookie ....one.... single player... " clearly swings us to victory "  over the Saints? 

One rookie safety would have been the difference?   Really?   That's really what you think?   

You think of yourself so smart and on point. Calling me out…but you at least if you think you’re calling me out…with attitude none the less….at least deal with the situation correctly. Because I even wanted two players. But will just skip past that point. When we traded with the Saints we did lose a first round pick. But didn’t the Saints trade up and take a player themselves also? WR Olave in fact. Stay with me here on the math. So next time you come at me calling me out at least try and make your weak point with the correct math. You used to make stronger arguments. I can listen and understand a different point of view. Strong enough reasoning could effect my opinion. You at least meet that bar and challenge me with any real reason to defend and explain my opinion more….I’ll oblige. The full answer isn’t a one word answer. I’ve already posted it here. Do really just go back and read my posts and put it all together. But at least start with we didn’t get a S and we enabled them to get hold of Olave. Then once you get that far…make a counter point. I don’t see anything pointing to your opinion of why my thinking isn’t correct and is clearly flawed. Just a post of you incorrectly quoting my thoughts. Trying to incorrectly oversimplify my thoughts. No counter opinion. 

On 1/1/2023 at 6:42 PM, GreenbleedinNC said:

They really only had 3 weapons. Kamara,a banged up Olave and the guy that kicked our arse Hill. Missing key plays all day long.no D stops. We had nothing. One guy said "this will be the most angry 13-3 team in NFL history". He's not wrong

How will they respond? Most angry? Confidence shook? Motivated and focused? Try to over do their jobs to make up the difference? We just don’t know the answer to that? Only place to be angry is with themselves. Doesn’t help anything really. Need to address just the real issues and tighten things up. 

Hulk smash and trying to do too much isn’t the answer. Figure out and address the real issues.

On 1/1/2023 at 6:45 PM, GreenbleedinNC said:

Yep. The "vaunted" O line looked awful. Running game vanished. They panicked early. Looked like the 3rd we got it together and would come back,then it all fell apart gain. We played the 3rd 1/4 and forgot about the other 3/4's. Thought that 78 yarder would wake the team up.get a spark. No back to sleep everyone

I remember one three and out specifically. Where Sanders ran for like 4. Then 5 and 1/2. Third and short Shew’s hands failed. I think your point is overall correct. But the Saints have a good D. But we’re missing their Pro Bowl S. Traded Ceedy Duce to us. So the statistics pointed towards favoring the passing game. With Hurts we’ve seen this team be flexible to take full advantage of the weakness most every week.

On 1/1/2023 at 6:26 PM, GreenbleedinNC said:

Yes it's all about the trade today. With that rook S we coulda won!!! So obvious 

Playing the Saints and the trade being with them. Many many ways it was a factor. Clearly, to me at least, made the trade look even less favorable.

On 1/1/2023 at 6:48 PM, GreenbleedinNC said:

Welp,now we are in a "MUST WIN". Both the Boyz and the Gnats have clinched a playoff berth I believe?

Is it really a ‘Must Win’?

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Is it really a ‘Must Win’?

Not necessarily disagreeing. But not sure we are talking about the same reasoning.

For the Top Seed? That’s not Must Win. To bounce back the confidence? Yes. Losing two in a row was really bad. But a third loss…to my most hated rival….with them resting best players….being fairly insignificant game for them? How brutal would that loss make things for this team? Completely devastating!

Soul crushing!

Season destroying!

Eagles need a W/Tie or the Wuss have to beat/Tie dullass

PSU wins Rose Bowl

8 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

https://www.espn.com/nfl/boxscore/_/gameId/401437940  So here is the box score/stats.. Fairly even across the board.The difference was allowing all those conversions on defense which we normally don't allow that many of. IDK just seemed to me like no adjustments were made. Maybe someone who saw the game can fill me in on the play calling. TOO much talent to have that many 3 and outs on offense. 

Came out throwing early; some penalties; some poor throws; did NOT get any rhythm going on offense. I personally thought they should have worked the run game with a backup RT playing, but that’s easy for me to say post game. Maybe Minshew playing conservative; took some very early sacks; maybe WRs weren’t winning. Hard to see everything on TV. 
 

I saw in an earlier post you said it was Sirianni’s fault. I say it’s on the players. WRs have to win. They were not from what I COULD see on TV. Minshew wasn't seeing the field "fast enough” given the early sacks. Driscoll is NOT Lane Johnson, but in my opinion he was not horrible. He was ok. Minshew was not accurate when given chances. So if you are going to pass and your WRs aren’t winning, your QB has to be perfect; and Minshew was far from it yesterday. 

2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You think of yourself so smart and on point. Calling me out…but you at least if you think you’re calling me out…with attitude none the less….at least deal with the situation correctly. Because I even wanted two players. But will just skip past that point. When we traded with the Saints we did lose a first round pick. But didn’t the Saints trade up and take a player themselves also? WR Olave in fact. Stay with me here on the math. So next time you come at me calling me out at least try and make your weak point with the correct math. You used to make stronger arguments. I can listen and understand a different point of view. Strong enough reasoning could effect my opinion. You at least meet that bar and challenge me with any real reason to defend and explain my opinion more….I’ll oblige. The full answer isn’t a one word answer. I’ve already posted it here. Do really just go back and read my posts and put it all together. But at least start with we didn’t get a S and we enabled them to get hold of Olave. Then once you get that far…make a counter point. I don’t see anything pointing to your opinion of why my thinking isn’t correct and is clearly flawed. Just a post of you incorrectly quoting my thoughts. Trying to incorrectly oversimplify my thoughts. No counter opinion. 

I hate to correct you Cunningham, yet you said (see above) "we..you mean….the Eagles, did LOSE a first round pick”. THAT would mean the Eagles would NOT have had a pick in the first round. However, they picked a DT named Davis from Georgia IN THE FIRST ROUND. That means they did NOT LOSE a first round pick. They TRADED first round picks AND GAINED a first round pick for next season. Not trying to be a dick saying it. It just seems like you have not understood the trade. Please explain your logic behind your quote of LOSING a first round pick. Please. Thank you.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

For the Top Seed? That’s not Must Win. To bounce back the confidence? Yes. Losing two in a row was really bad. But a third loss…to my most hated rival….with them resting best players….being fairly insignificant game for them? How brutal would that loss make things for this team? Completely devastating!

Soul crushing!

Season destroying!

You do hate the giants. I think it is a must win if they have any chance of going to the NFC championship and hopefully a Super Bowl. Lose and its probably one and done.

Bad news at the Bills Bengals game

Just now, Asg 15 said:

Bad news at the Bills Bengals game

Yeah this has never happened before

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Playing the Saints and the trade being with them. Many many ways it was a factor. Clearly, to me at least, made the trade look even less favorable.

LOL the point is say the Gnats took him, or the wuss we would still have to face him sometime with SOMEONE,the fact the Saints got him is irrelevant. he was going to be selected in round 1 regardless of the trade,so that point you can place in the circular file

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Is it really a ‘Must Win’?

Not necessarily disagreeing. But not sure we are talking about the same reasoning.

You want home field or not? If you do it's a must win?

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

For the Top Seed? That’s not Must Win. To bounce back the confidence? Yes. Losing two in a row was really bad. But a third loss…to my most hated rival….with them resting best players….being fairly insignificant game for them? How brutal would that loss make things for this team? Completely devastating!

Soul crushing!

Season destroying!

Top seed gets a free week off(aka bye) You don't think we could use that???

I think this game is done.

37 minutes ago, Senhorcook said:

I saw in an earlier post you said it was Sirianni’s fault

Did the team come out fired up? SO fired up they could not score in 30 minutes? This was a home game? Run game VANISHED,that is on the COACH yes???? Coach formulates the game plan and changes it if he needs to? Why did the run game disappear only being down 1 score? The players don't make that decision the coach does. When he saw Shew was still "off" some why didn't he go back to the run game???? SOMEONE chose to "let it ride" and it wasn't the players

As a jockey, we had a fellow jockey that got killed in the 2nd race of a 12 race card of trials for a big Futurity. We decided it would be best if we stopped the races that day and come back the next day to run the rest of the races. People, trainers, and owners were pissed but THEY weren’t the ones risking their lives. So i totally get it.

3 minutes ago, Senhorcook said:

I think this game is done.

SO how do they make this up or finish it this close to the playoffs?

Maybe play it tomorrow. Its a great question.

Is he alive? I suspect not