So that’s the depth chart situation

Works out pretty good. Blankenship was a great undrafted find.

Became a crucial piece to our puzzle.

Wish Michael Irvin didn't do the interviews last night, at least he didn't go all crazy, just dumb

3 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I can agree here. But if there is a QB worth taking number one. You don’t pass on it. Not sure what trade you take to give away an elite franchise QB?

Right, they have their choice of players.  Which includes the choice of QBs.  

3 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Isn’t getting all the way to the SB after having a 17th regular season game with all our starters something of a miracle?

I don't really care about the miracle part...I'm more focused on the players that are playing...  you seem worried about Dallas scoring vs this guy Scott?     We have a great opportunity ahead with a full lineup.  Even the guy who will only have 2 punts for a 39 yard net average is playing.   It should be fun. 

3 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Just think this is the healthiest I’ve ever seen is get to the end of a season.

Is it though?  You seem to harp on trying to give the QB an excuse because he is " injured" ???

3 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

So I noticed his reaction. Lashed out at the criminals. But then took a shot at the city. Not really normal.

What was the shot at the city?    UT didn't sound like ..." ya' ll did this ... here"   like here as in where he has all the people or means to know it's them?  It didn't sound to you like " ya'll" aren't from Philly?   Like they came there to steal the car?  

That's what it sounded like to me. 

3 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Works out pretty good. Blankenship was a great undrafted find.

Pretty good.   Only pretty good?   Out of 32 teams ... you think our secondary is only pretty good?

I don't see that Scott guy playing this game. I didn't see him on the field in the playoffs???  

32 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Pretty good.   Only pretty good?   Out of 32 teams ... you think our secondary is only pretty good?

I don't see that Scott guy playing this game. I didn't see him on the field in the playoffs???  

You’re just in full on **** mode. I just explained how we are playing things on thesecondary. Keep reaching for things to be upset about.

10 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You’re just in full on **** mode. I just explained how we are playing things on thesecondary. Keep reaching for things to be upset about.

Lol... who is upset?  Like I've been saying the Eagles have a great opportunity here.   Yes ...I kinda led you to explain how " Scott " is irrelevant.  Because all of us know CGJ is playing slot when it wasn't Maddox...and Blankenship was playing the S spot.   

Basically... Aiyuk is full of S@#t.  There is no flaw. It takes better players to execute the plays, not " scheming vs any imaginary flaws"  

SF couldn't protect their QB, they weren't going to do crap against us.  KC may succeed, but it's going to be because of Mahomes,  Kelce and their other players stepping up.  Not any BS that Aiyuk is spewing.  

Dallas exposed Scott. He ain't playing.   The current Eagles defense that is healthy...is the best in the league.

The beauty of the Superbowl when the teams didn't already play each other is that we get to see the best vs the best...their best offense vs our best D.   But most of the time, it's what happens on the other side of the ball that decides the game.  I like our matchup their too.   Either way should be great game with the Eagles having good chance to be the champion.  Exciting time for the city and fanbase.

Get that parade and we'll see what CGJ thinks of Philly. 

It's gonna be a long week

6 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Felt true feelings came out when he was upset. I’d never take a crap at the city over some dumb thugs.

They probably didn't know it was his car LOL. I doubt that deters him from signing a big contract if the money is there and I believe all athletes would trade a Kia for a SB ring,so before we ramble on and on,let's see how it goes. If he leaves he does,neither of us make that call

6 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Well as far as the Bears are concerned, it’s all about is there that top stud QB? Numbers don’t matter. Only part about numbers is if you have four really good ones…kind of makes that top guy earn it. So he must be pretty dog on good

Fields was drafted high also? Put any QB behind a crap team and you get crap results. It takes 10 other guys on offense ya know? Drafting another rook QB won't solve the issues,you merely have a new face with a crap team. Why not trade that pick,grab extra high picks, and give the QB some weapons to work with? Or beef up the O line. How did the Jags do this year? They have a better team than Chicago,so he did ok there at the end. They need more for him also. a QB is not your teams savior,you need quality people around him. IDK why this is hard to understand nor why you argue about it. Any normal person would know you can't judge a QB's value if you never give him any tools. Put Fields with this team WE have for 2 years, and I would bet he has a better record than he did with the Bears. Not real hard to grasp here

6 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Well as far as the Bears are concerned, it’s all about is there that top stud QB? Numbers don’t matter. Only part about numbers is if you have four really good ones…kind of makes that top guy earn it. So he must be pretty dog on good

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/kiper-justin-fields-2023-draft-002943086.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall   Someones opinion,but obviously Fields is not trash LOL. Sometimes I worry about you

5 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

So I noticed his reaction. Lashed out at the criminals. But then took a shot at the city. Not really normal.

If you know the guys name that stole it please tell us so he can lash out at HIM. 

6 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Significance to keep him from playing. Kind of just a dumb statement, really. He clearly has been suiting up. So he’s going to play. Only if if it got reinsured really bad would he not play. The statement wasn’t the injury issue insignificant to Hurts. It wasn’t it doesn’t effect him. It wasn’t that there is no pain. See the wording is actually key FL. Sorry if you don’t get that. But that’s a huge difference in what you are saying versus what was actually said.

What was actually said? "His injury is not significant for the SB". Is there any other way to say this?????. Why would they bother to say this???? Guys like mahomes play through pain every game???? This is something new for you???? IDK what else to say here,just read the sentence LOL,jebus

6 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I’m saying the Bears would have to feel no QB is worthy of taking at one. Nothing to do with Fields really. Just scout and evaluate this years class. If you can’t find significant holes in every draftees game….then you gotta take the franchise Qb first.

Fields can be a franchise QB? Isn't that why they took him where they did? To start a re-build you start at QB? and build around him?. If some team offered them 5 round 1's and 2 round 2's(or any other ridiculous offer) I'm sure the Bears would do that. Unless the deal is so fantastic they can't turn it down,they keep Fields. Now Stroud is ranked highly. Yet I was told it was "dumb to draft OSU QB's" Fields and Stroud are 2 pretty good ones. Of course the Bears could screw up all their picks(sounds familiar huh?) but don't put that on Fields. He is good at his position.

6 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I’m saying the Bears would have to feel no QB is worthy of taking at one. Nothing to do with Fields really. Just scout and evaluate this years class. If you can’t find significant holes in every draftees game….then you gotta take the franchise Qb first.

So replace(basically) a rookie you drafted with another rookie? What have you gained? As I said put any QB in Chicago and you'd get a similar record because the REST of the team is trash(mostly). IDK what you can't understand about this. Anyway,if I was the Bears I would trade back the 1 because I have my QB in place. Unless I get an outlandish deal. I would also have to build around the new QB I drafted,so it would have to be what I gave up to get Fields and then some more on top of that 

6 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

But I’m not passing on them to see what Fields has got. See what I mean?

I'm not because Fields put up nice numbers with a trash team. Why fix what ain't broke?

2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You’re just in full on **** mode. I just explained how we are playing things on thesecondary. Keep reaching for things to be upset about.

Guess you should have used a better choice of words 🤣🤣 See how that works now????

49 minutes ago, Asg 15 said:

It's gonna be a long week

Already is......on here HAHAHA

Sorry this is far off topic but it made me laugh

 

Steve Wilks new 9ers DC - another slot that won't be poached from us