Supposedly Vance Joseph will interview for our DC job according to Josina Anderson.

https://www.nfl.com/news/bucky-brooks-top-five-2023-nfl-draft-prospects-by-position-1-0-stroud-young-hook

The Bears won’t become no interesting anytime soon this offseason. Fields, the number one pick….but they also have almost 100 mil in cap space.

4 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

https://www.nfl.com/news/bucky-brooks-top-five-2023-nfl-draft-prospects-by-position-1-0-stroud-young-hook

The UCLA RB he describes like we’ve heard Siri preferring.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Pretty messed up. Teams just obviously don’t feel he’s a great HC option.

Right...specifically for him.  He obviously needs to get away from KC.

58 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Punt coverage sure didn’t cover up for it.

The defense wasn't going to stop KC if they had to drive 300 yards.  It became a video game in the 2nd half where it was clock management.   The key play of the game for me was the 3rd and 2 before the punt... that should have been 2 runs.  At this point,we get within 2 yards ...I'm good with 2 sneaks.  We had people at the party wanting to sneak on the 2 point conversion....lol.

We were ahead...we weren't stopping KC... need to trade scores to win,with us managing the time to have the ball at the end.   Really if we don't burn the first time out, could be Hurts gets a minute to move into FG range. 

I hate the call at the end...hate the punt return,hate Hurts fumble... the coach still managed the games well all season up until that timeout and 3rd and 2.  

59 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Supposedly Vance Joseph will interview for our DC job according to Josina Anderson.

We hire him, along with the addition I our front office....we are set up to get draft picks if these guys move on and get promoted.  

Now that I think about it...maybe nobody wants Bienemy because they don't want to give KC the extra draft pick?

Fields stated he hopes Chicago gets a dome.

20 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

The defense wasn't going to stop KC if they had to drive 300 yards.  It became a video game in the 2nd half where it was clock management.   The key play of the game for me was the 3rd and 2 before the punt... that should have been 2 runs.  At this point,we get within 2 yards ...I'm good with 2 sneaks.  We had people at the party wanting to sneak on the 2 point conversion....lol.

We were ahead...we weren't stopping KC... need to trade scores to win,with us managing the time to have the ball at the end.   Really if we don't burn the first time out, could be Hurts gets a minute to move into FG range. 

I hate the call at the end...hate the punt return,hate Hurts fumble... the coach still managed the games well all season up until that timeout and 3rd and 2.  

Hurts fumble doesn’t even happen without Seumalo false start don’t forget. Already lined up for the QB nonsneak.

Anybody here going to get into the XFL?

11 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Anybody here going to get into the XFL?

I did last year because Philly had a team.  I’ll have to look at rosters and see if there’s anyone worth watching.

Dean Blandino says the NFL Competition Committee might look to eliminate the "Tush Push" play on QB sneaks that was so effective for Jalen Hurts and the Philadelphia Eagles this season. https://t.co/nCP16kQEiA

4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

The UCLA RB he describes like we’ve heard Siri preferring.

Sources Tell Us

"He has to eat. The more carries he gets, the more damage he does. I know it’s not popular, but I would draft him in the first round and just get him the rock as much as I possibly could. He’s a much tougher runner than Saquon (Barkley) was coming out.” -- Personnel executive for NFC team      This is Robinson, and he will be there when we pick(even if we traded back a few spots). If Sanders doesn't stay, which we all assume he goes,and if we believe in taking the BPA,I still can't write him off. How do you turn down a guy with this description?. I wouldn't take Charbonnet,I would rather add a FA RB because he is "run of the mill". Although Robinson is a 3 down back,he would be(IMO) an upgrade over Sanders and we'd have him 5 years. With Gains we wouldn't be giving up anything in the run game for next year, or the next few years, and if they are going to do the "no tush push" rule,we could use a banger(and here he is right in your face). Although everyone else has written him off as our first pick,I cannot

The 2 second half TDs that were so open were the same play thet JAX  Agnew scored against the Eagles in their game. AR saw that and Gannon wasn't smart enough to counter it

2 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Sources Tell Us

"He has to eat. The more carries he gets, the more damage he does. I know it’s not popular, but I would draft him in the first round and just get him the rock as much as I possibly could. He’s a much tougher runner than Saquon (Barkley) was coming out.” -- Personnel executive for NFC team      This is Robinson, and he will be there when we pick(even if we traded back a few spots). If Sanders doesn't stay, which we all assume he goes,and if we believe in taking the BPA,I still can't write him off. How do you turn down a guy with this description?. I wouldn't take Charbonnet,I would rather add a FA RB because he is "run of the mill". Although Robinson is a 3 down back,he would be(IMO) an upgrade over Sanders and we'd have him 5 years. With Gains we wouldn't be giving up anything in the run game for next year, or the next few years, and if they are going to do the "no tush push" rule,we could use a banger(and here he is right in your face). Although everyone else has written him off as our first pick,I cannot

First pick... or first round?

1 hour ago, joemas6 said:

First pick... or first round?

He won't last until 30. Could possibly move back get him and an extra pick. The QB rush will help us some, but I believe he would have to be our first pick.  Most teams would love a 3 down workhorse. I would be fine with him and Gains(maybe Scott stays too) in a time share/RBBC it's nice to know you have a 3 down back in your stable if needed. I'm seeing him go anywhere from 8 into the mid teens. No clue how far back we could go and still get him,but I suspect not real far. It would be another "Sanders move" You got him for 5 years,then move to the next one

The other option would be to take Gibbs at 30,he would be there around then. Just depends on the talent you want. IMO Gibbs isn't close to him. There again though, you'd have a nice(Gibbs) RB for 5 years,so I could see that also. But Gibbs is not on the same level as this kid

9 hours ago, joemas6 said:

I've heard the last few days that he was going to make a lateral move because it seems that being in KC isn't helping him get a head coaching job.   Or really even being considered. 

I guess it seems the perception will be that he will do more with a new team away from Andy.

Bad idea. No win position for him. Expectations will be unrealistic.

7 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Anybody here going to get into the XFL?

I’ll Pass. You?

I would take Robinson or Gibbs,those are the only 2 RB's I would take,unless we feel Gains can handle most of the load from here on. 

1 minute ago, Senhorcook said:

I’ll Pass. You?

The XFL is dead,it's the USFL. It's fun to watch because it's football and helps me through "the drought" lol

Risky but doable. TB. trade them the 10 pick for their 19 and 50 and their 6th.Would put them in range to get a decent QB. 19 may be a little late fr robinson,but maybe we can use those 7 picks to move up a spot or 2. I have him between 14-18 as of now. So we would have 19,30,50,62,94.TB 6th and 2 7's. So use the 6th and 7ths to move back up to 15 and robinson should be there(in theory).I would use all 3 late picks if I had to,but now we have the #1 RB and picks 30,50,62 and 94 left yet.I will work on this tomorrow see if there are players there we need so we don;t need to move again. Still stuck on Ika at 30 and still have 3 more nice picks left 2,2 and 3. So that would be Roinson and Ika in round 1 and I won;t complain about that

23 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Risky but doable. TB. trade them the 10 pick for their 19 and 50 and their 6th.Would put them in range to get a decent QB. 19 may be a little late fr robinson,but maybe we can use those 7 picks to move up a spot or 2. I have him between 14-18 as of now. So we would have 19,30,50,62,94.TB 6th and 2 7's. So use the 6th and 7ths to move back up to 15 and robinson should be there(in theory).I would use all 3 late picks if I had to,but now we have the #1 RB and picks 30,50,62 and 94 left yet.I will work on this tomorrow see if there are players there we need so we don;t need to move again. Still stuck on Ika at 30 and still have 3 more nice picks left 2,2 and 3. So that would be Roinson and Ika in round 1 and I won;t complain about that

Do a mock draft without taking a RB until pick 62 or later... that's the more realistic approach with the Eagles. 

4 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Do a mock draft without taking a RB until pick 62 or later... that's the more realistic approach with the Eagles. 

No need, because I would not do it. I would ride with Gain,scott and a FA pick up or 2 or use a 7th because if I am going to use a pick on a RB,he would need to be a difference maker and at 62 and later I don't see any. Perhaps we see one stand out at the combine

8 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

He won't last until 30. Could possibly move back get him and an extra pick. The QB rush will help us some, but I believe he would have to be our first pick.  Most teams would love a 3 down workhorse. I would be fine with him and Gains(maybe Scott stays too) in a time share/RBBC it's nice to know you have a 3 down back in your stable if needed. I'm seeing him go anywhere from 8 into the mid teens. No clue how far back we could go and still get him,but I suspect not real far. It would be another "Sanders move" You got him for 5 years,then move to the next one

We got Sanders in the second round.