He looks fairly clearly like a Pro Bowl level player.

1 hour ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

That's fine if you think Gains can take over for Sanders(which I previously stated)

I'll state this....we won a Superbowl with only Sproles and Smallwood on the roster post draft.    I think we need to look at priority here and see how easily RB is replaced.   No need to invest big money or picks.   

We have to address the defense and our OL.   

I don't think we end up without picks from rounds 4 -6.   There is a lot to look at here.  First being the impact of RBs in general.    3 solid guys is enough.  

59 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Stated there are "decent" RB's out there,however Robinsoin is a difference maker and those are guys you draft,plenty of run of the mill guys available in the draft or FA.With only 4 picks I need guys that can be my future,and once again I CANNOT RULE HIM OUT at this time. Maybe I can later,but right now no one knows squat. I personally don't care either way,but you guys are writing off a "better than Barkley" RB??? Suddenly taking the BPA doesn't exist?? Be nice to have a stud RB in your stable for 5 years while you rebuild. So write him off that is your prerogative,I personally can't at this time

RBs in general are not difference makers.  

58 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Wasted pick,just get a FA RB With only 4 picks take the top guy or none at all

I agree with not taking RB in top 3 rounds. 

37 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

This is a guy we just have to talk about. Michael Mayer is a sure fire super stud!

I like Nolan Smith also at 30

2 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

I agree with not taking RB in top 3 rounds. 

I can't rule it out yet. it's TOO early,but I'm fine with Brooks later

30 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Can you watch this film of a super stud TE and really just pass up such a great looking player? His ceiling is like they call him ‘Baby Gronk!’ His floor is very good starter level TE.

I'm in if we got 2 TE sets... cause mismatches.  It didn't work with Ertz because he didn't cause a mismatch in the run game if he had to block a small LB or S.   If this guy comes in and is paired with Goedert , basically taking over for Pascal or Quez with the snaps.  Injury protection vs Goedert.  And if used properly... that could be a game changer.... because it's both run and pass game mismatch.

7 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

RBs in general are not difference makers.  

He seems better than "in general"(which is what the others are) I'm not going to argue about it. Gibbs will go end of 1, must be a difference between a 10 pick and a 30 pick I would think

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I can't rule it out yet. it's TOO early,but I'm fine with Brooks later

I'm not ruling anything out...except we didn't trade with the Saints to take a RB first.   That's nice with better than Bark.   Bark not winning too much in the NFL...it doesn't translate like amateur football where the RB dominates.

3 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

I'm not ruling anything out...except we didn't trade with the Saints to take a RB first.   That's nice with better than Bark.   Bark not winning too much in the NFL...it doesn't translate like amateur football where the RB dominates.

We traded for the 10 pick because it's the 10 pick and was a great trade. it's basically a free pick. Take anyone you want I didn't get the 10 for a TE either 

If the NFL rules out the tush push I'm still fine with Brooks at 232 pounds

At 30 I am torn right now between Nolan Smith(edge) or Ika at DT

19 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

I'm not ruling anything out...except we didn't trade with the Saints to take a RB first.   That's nice with better than Bark.   Bark not winning too much in the NFL...it doesn't translate like amateur football where the RB dominates.

BTW with Robinson I was also assuming a trade back to around 15 if you were following my posts. Which we should trade back from 10 to 12-15 I would think. Tough draft to call with all the teams scrambling for QB's. Why I want to wait and see what shakes out first. Believe we could trade back and still land Bresee(DT Clemson) and pick up an extra selection

25 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

He seems better than "in general"(which is what the others are) I'm not going to argue about it. Gibbs will go end of 1, must be a difference between a 10 pick and a 30 pick I would think

Better than in general ... give me your guys in the NFL who fit that.  

The hope is that fourth QB, likely Richardson from Florida, has a team leaping for him at 10.

21 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

We traded for the 10 pick because it's the 10 pick and was a great trade. it's basically a free pick. Take anyone you want I didn't get the 10 for a TE either 

You have choice of Jim Brown or Gronk at pick 10.... in the year 2023.  Which player you taking.  Me, I don't hesitate to answer Gronk.   If it's 1970... I'll take Brown.  Different game today.

Day three I see Whyle for Cincy that could beat out Calcatarra at TE. 

I see TJ Edwards having the same supposed market value as Tremaine Edwards. That’s pretty tough. I see Tremaine as soooooo talented. TJ has earned it here big time with very little pay. Both coming up at 11 mil per year.

Of course I’d think the DC will be key to any decisions.

I thought Kyzir White did not look good at the end of the season. Got abused there in that big game. I question Gannon on whether Dean wasn’t a better option? 

Gardner-Johnson Fined $14K

C.J. Gardner-Johnson penalized $14,111 for lowering helmet to initiate contact in Super Bowl (NFL Network)      So NOW even though no flags was thrown we're going to fine players for non calls????? WTH???-Goodell SUCKS

45 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Better than in general ... give me your guys in the NFL who fit that.  

First define "general"

48 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

You have choice of Jim Brown or Gronk at pick 10.... in the year 2023.  Which player you taking.  Me, I don't hesitate to answer Gronk.   If it's 1970... I'll take Brown.  Different game today.

If I have a hole at RB and not at TE I take the RB. I would be ok moving back from 10 to 15 getting another pick and adding Bijan. Obviously you have ruled that out already and I haven't

4 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Gardner-Johnson Fined $14K

C.J. Gardner-Johnson penalized $14,111 for lowering helmet to initiate contact in Super Bowl (NFL Network)      So NOW even though no flags was thrown we're going to fine players for non calls????? WTH???-Goodell SUCKS

This has been going on for over a decade

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

This has been going on for over a decade

because Goodell SUCKS. If there was no flag there was no penalty,how do you fine players with no penalties? Random fines like drug testing?