16 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Same example as he didn't do anything at all and took up a cheap roster spot..  except those teams weren't top seeded Superbowl level teams with all of their starters and top backups healthy.

Was a seventh round draft pick with the whole reason to draft him was to teach him football. That was the year we tried to repeat our Championship. Alshon Jeffrey drop away from Conference Championship.

15 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Mailata wasn't on the practice squad.  He took up a cheap roster spot. 

So now some backup RB is so valuable to waste a roster spot on for nothing? Not to teach him football. He played at the mega Ohio St. Highest level of college ball.  A RB. The position that usually transitions the easiest. The position known as the most youthful. Who is one year younger than Mailata…now.

24 year old RB from Ohio St you are developing? You compare that to a Rugby player that was  21 to teach football and play T?

We drafted Mailata

Over at Bleacher Report, the word on Sermon was that there was a lot to like and nothing to love

9 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

So now some backup RB is so valuable to waste a roster spot on for nothing? Not to teach him football. He played at the mega Ohio St. Highest level of college ball.  A RB. The position that usually transitions the easiest. The position known as the most youthful. Who is one year younger than Mailata…now.

Did he need to play last year?   Do you only want to have 3 RBs on your roster?   I think with everyone playing in front of him and the team dominating... I don't think it was necessary. 

Not how Mailata as ever described 

6 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

24 year old RB from Ohio St you are developing? You compare that to a Rugby player that was  21 to teach football and play T?

I'm " developing" im saying there was no need for him to play with the success and health of what was in front of him on the depth chart.   Why isn't that obvious?

Just now, joemas6 said:

Did he need to play last year?   Do you only want to have 3 RBs on your roster?   I think with everyone playing in front of him and the team dominating... I don't think it was necessary. 

Exactly a fourth RB on the roster that wasn’t even suiting up….wasn’t even close to necessary. PS? Fine

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Over at Bleacher Report, the word on Sermon was that there was a lot to like and nothing to love

Yeah... for my 4th string guys on a Superbowl team ... a lot to like is fine.   

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Exactly a fourth RB on the roster that wasn’t even suiting up….wasn’t even close to necessary. PS? Fine

Then....PS + poach + injury = not fine...you follow?

I mean... you are complaining about the 7th DB or worse and the 4th RB...

After a year where 30 teams didn't have half of that.. with absolutely brutal football played by 4/5th of the league. 

It's hilarious

2 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Then....PS + poach + injury = not fine...you follow?

Totally fine. Call up the other PS RB

CGJ was awful according to your stats...but we should have signed him week 3?   

How does this make sense?

You don't see where it looks like you just want to complain...just to complain? 

Everybody so caught up trying to poach our fourth string RB that the Niners dropped. So dearly crucial a player. With all his abilities to maybe kind of like ceiling.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Totally fine. Call up the other PS RB

And what does that do?  Then you have to find another player to put on practice squad.... does that save cap space or win you a Superbowl?

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

CGJ was awful according to your stats...but we should have signed him week 3?   

How does this make sense?

You don't see where it looks like you just want to complain...just to complain? 

Nope, you are pulling out the negative parts of my assessment of CGJ.  In that same talk I also brought up his strengths. Said he’s worth 13 mil. Same amount I wanted to sign him for week 3. Now he likely is gone(like I said).

You have this black or white viewpoint. Like everything has to be all rosey or stink. Rarely ever applies. Most of the time there are positives and negatives. 

19 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

I mean... you are complaining about the 7th DB or worse and the 4th RB...

After a year where 30 teams didn't have half of that.. with absolutely brutal football played by 4/5th of the league. 

It's hilarious

It was more than the seventh DB. Stashed several DB on our roster last year. I’m actually fine with the idea. It was a capped out team rebuilding. The problem is that none panned out. Not every player works out. That’s just reality. But needed to get one of all those to work. I felt like two, really.

 

43 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You have this black or white viewpoint. Like everything has to be all rosey or stink. Rarely ever applies. Most of the time there are positives and negatives. 

Yea...it's black and white if you want to resign, trade or cut a guy.   Absolutely it's how you have to run a business. 

44 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You have this black or white viewpoint. Like everything has to be all rosey or stink. Rarely ever applies. Most of the time there are positives and negatives. 

Like when a player gives away 7 free points to the other team without anyone else being able to do anything about it.     You know...the guy you just can't bring yourself to say anything negative about. .

Oops.. it was a false start on the play before by Seamulo ... I forgot that false starts often lead to QB fumbles the next play for a free TD.

36 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

It was more than the seventh DB. Stashed several DB on our roster last year. I’m actually fine with the idea. It was a capped out team rebuilding. The problem is that none panned out. Not every player works out. That’s just reality. But needed to get one of all those to work. I felt like two, really.

 

Blankenship didn't work out?

23 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Yea...it's black and white if you want to resign, trade or cut a guy.   Absolutely it's how you have to run a business. 

You want to sign plenty of these good players. But there is a salary cap.  I can have a viewpoint of positives and negatives about a player and a ceiling for their pay. Want to resign….but only up to a certain amount.

Seems totally logical to me

37 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You want to sign plenty of these good players. But there is a salary cap.  I can have a viewpoint of positives and negatives about a player and a ceiling for their pay. Want to resign….but only up to a certain amount.

I don't really want to sign everyone.   Really I could just sign CGJ...let Slay walk and start over.    That can all be done under the cap with plenty of room.