Just a FWIW,the Eagles logo is the only NFL logo facing to the left

1 hour ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

You know what I mean,but yes disturbed Ham has to pick it apart rather than just get the idea. Hello Darkness my old friend 

I think we should all agree to a certain standard here. Twelve man formation plans just has to made fun of…basic. I believe you are referring to what I think of as Pro Form sets. Pretty old school basic personnel in essence. You desire the split back. 

21 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Just a FWIW,the Eagles logo is the only NFL logo facing to the left

It's so the E in the feathers is facing correctly

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GQ3IB4iJmjQ&pp=ygUQV2VzdGJyb29rIHJldHVybg%3D%3D

Imagine the phones of UDFA's are burning up today, not being posted cause it's Sunday.

5 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I think we should all agree to a certain standard here. Twelve man formation plans just has to made fun of…basic. I believe you are referring to what I think of as Pro Form sets. Pretty old school basic personnel in essence. You desire the split back. 

The standard is we are all fans who understand the game. If you have to pick apart every word and put it under a microscope that is beyond fandom

6 minutes ago, mjkline1958 said:

It's so the E in the feathers is facing correctly

Should remove the bottom bar then unless E's have 4 bars. Just sayin

May see some team cuts coming out from others we can add

14 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

So I guess we know how that’ll look…nice

21 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

AKA instant chemistry

34 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I think we should all agree to a certain standard here. Twelve man formation plans just has to made fun of…basic. I believe you are referring to what I think of as Pro Form sets. Pretty old school basic personnel in essence. You desire the split back. 

You have the ‘I’ Formation with the old straight line FB Power. But Pro Form you don’t just lean a FB towards a Strong side by half a step. You split them evenly in the backfield.

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

AKA instant chemistry

Think Carter is going to thrive!

Just replace those two up front(non Eagles) in the photo with Reddick and Sweat….NASTY!

4 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Just replace those two up front(non Eagles) in the photo with Reddick and Sweat….NASTY!

Or really it would have to be more Milton and …Sweat or Reddick. 

Right now it will be Fletch…but he’s getting short term in the plans

18 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You have the ‘I’ Formation with the old straight line FB Power. But Pro Form you don’t just lean a FB towards a Strong side by half a step. You split them evenly in the backfield.

The point was, we can attack and cause match-up problems from any formation,but that went over your head LOL

31 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Just replace those two up front(non Eagles) in the photo with Reddick and Sweat….NASTY!

Cox would be the other DT. Still have Graham. Etc... I forgot about the DT we got from the Saints...then Milton and this Ojomo can play... nice depth.  You have an early down run stuffing group and a pass rushing group.

18 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

The point was, we can attack and cause match-up problems from any formation,but that went over your head LOL

Would be nice to cause that matchup advantage from the 2 TE package though right.    You see why i was looking there.   

You figure ... 2 WRs...1 TE...1 RB ...the standard 4 that are out there for you.   Brown, Smith ,Goedert and the RB....   now... add that stud to the group... does it really matter which position it is?

You would think the WR works best because then you could also have depth behind 2 guys... where the TE only provides depth when Goedert comes out....but still... the more weapons the better.

But im not just looking " upgrade Quez" I'm talking a difference maker.

Maybe a little greedy on my part, but that's where I was thinking as an option if both our top targets on the DL and OL were taken.

1 hour ago, EaglesTD123 said:

Then add Ricks as a UDFA. I still can't believe he made it through the whole draft process

3 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Would be nice to cause that matchup advantage from the 2 TE package though right.    You see why i was looking there.   

You figure ... 2 WRs...1 TE...1 RB ...the standard 4 that are out there for you.   Brown, Smith ,Goedert and the RB....   now... add that stud to the group... does it really matter which position it is?

You would think the WR works best because then you could also have depth behind 2 guys... where the TE only provides depth when Goedert comes out....but still... the more weapons the better.

But im not just looking " upgrade Quez" I'm talking a difference maker.

Maybe a little greedy on my part, but that's where I was thinking as an option if both our top targets on the DL and OL were taken.

I'm hoping Calcaterra can step up and into that role. That's why I preferred a WR because after Quez we don't have anyone who can be a difference maker(that I am aware of) Quez dropped off last year,dropped a big one in the SB. We had Calc and I think we still have Jackson we've been coddling at TE and I didn't see any WR's that could step up,so thats why I wanted a WR over a TE

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I'm hoping Calcaterra can step up and into that role

I'm hoping for TE Jackson to do something…SOMETHING lol

2 minutes ago, EaglesTD123 said:

I'm hoping for TE Jackson to do something…SOMETHING lol

(see above) LOL