22 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

That's injury.... in talking about the lineup we have to start.  On 3rd and 2... only Jurgens and RB changed. Really Sanders came out on a ton of those plays.  So we basically just added more options at RB....for these specific plays. 

Jurgens is an unknown.

RB all healthy. T realistically this season.

Idk ... I'm just trying to understand here..   Miles Sanders apparently was the reason we were able to kill clock?  

22 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I already stated that multiple times,and once again why we need to keep Sermon get it????

That’s why keep 4

17 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Say Penny goes down,we insert Sermon in the rotation. Even with 4 RB;s one of them is still expendable. That's a pretty solid insurance policy in my view

Just call up the PS RB

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

That’s why keep 4

As I said if you want to put Sermon on the RESTRICTED PS then Im ok with that,but if Penny goes down we have no other basher back,maybe Scott can cover

So we wasted all this time here 

.

Basically...fear of the RBs getting injured and not being able to close out a game like when we had to opitome of the reliable player....Miles Sanders at RB. 

This is what we have been cryptically trying to say? 

21 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

So Dak ... you said he got paid because they added Cooper?   Obviously the #1 WR is the best friend of the stud QB.

The running game can mask a bad QB.  In the modern game you aren't going to be able to win avoiding the QB making passes.

Unless your opponent stinks...like the bulk of last year.

You don’t avoid passing. But it’s a balance. Much harder to defend an O that isn’t one dimensional. Simple basic football logic to me.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

That’s why keep 4

We had 4,replaced Sanders with Swift and Penny,therefore we should keep 5 RB's

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You don’t avoid passing. But it’s a balance. Much harder to defend an O that isn’t one dimensional. Simple basic football logic to me.

Clock killing running the ball isnt 1 dimensional?

16 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Up 10 points,don't drop the ball LOL

Not even half the game was played yet. But sure…whatever.

2 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

So we wasted all this time here 

.

Basically...fear of the RBs getting injured and not being able to close out a game like when we had to opitome of the reliable player....Miles Sanders at RB. 

This is what we have been cryptically trying to say? 

I worry about Penny playing 17 games and why I would like to keep Sermon. Until Penny can prove he can stay on the field for me it's a concern

17 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Up 10 points,don't drop the ball LOL

Does  it matter even? Blame Hurts for the loss. Whatever. Would have been a blowout without him. Best player on the field.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Not even half the game was played yet. But sure…whatever.

yeah that false start gave them a free 7 huh? but "whatever"

17 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Game day isn't the 53.   I'll be curious though.   You know I'm not a big theory guy..  I like to check the facts. 

So when is cut down day for final rosters?

I'll look at all 32 teams and see.   So I'll give your " most teams"  comment...that 17 teams ( just over half,will only keep 3 RBs.)   

Be curious to see...especially what we consider the better teams.

Depends on returner situation some

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

You don’t avoid passing. But it’s a balance. Much harder to defend an O that isn’t one dimensional. Simple basic football logic to me.

Nah... you just said you wanted to run 3 times for 10 yards when the opponent knows its coming.     Having to mix in the pass makes it harder.  

That's the NFL....in the modern game who can just grind out the clock running the ball in dominant fashion today?

On a consistent basis?  

That's not the game today.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Does  it matter even? Blame Hurts for the loss. Whatever. Would have been a blowout without him. Best player on the field.

Yep he was the best player that made 1 fatal error

Just now, joemas6 said:

Nah... you just said you wanted to run 3 times for 10 yards when the opponent knows its coming.     Having to mix in the pass makes it harder.  

That's the NFL....in the modern game who can just grind out the clock running the ball in dominant fashion today?

On a consistent basis?  

That's not the game today.

1970 Woody Hayes

17 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LMAO oh boy. NO) NO,the teams we face are alot better than the last 2 years,we need to keep our foot on the gas because most teams we face can SCORE

I’m not disagreeing with what you’re saying. But I was saying with one minute to go…with the lead. Kill the clock!

18 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Then you are a fool

Nah…RB 5s are easy to come by

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

I’m not disagreeing with what you’re saying. But I was saying with one minute to go…with the lead. Kill the clock!

That was my "issue" last year when we started the 2 minute clock killing with 12 minutes left.We cannot do that this year

18 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Then you are a fool

I’m a fool because Sermon is so precious we can’t win without him? Lord.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Nah…RB 5s are easy to come by

So are WR 8's

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

I’m a fool because Sermon is so precious we can’t win without him? Lord.

Cant win without WR 8 either we're DOOOOOMED

15 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

More so this year we would assume... being that we shouldn't be winning by 3 TDs every game like last year. 

Then killing the clock matters. Up three TDs don’t care 

15 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

You told me my goal of 32 PPG was stupid remember? Welp sorry thats what you need to score(maybe more)

False…you didn’t say "goal” ….if that’s what you meant ok…I have no problem with ‘goal’