1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

All the Chiefs did to beat us was throw to JuJu and Kelce while countering with the run. JuJu left. Kelce is hurt. Chiefs look vulnerable!

And run the fumble in untouched. 

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Seems like it was decided the team needed to go with nine captains mostly revolving around the WR duo. Naming AJ a captain and not DeVonta would lead to all sorts of upcoming divisions. Already have witnessed media trying to drive a wedge between the two. Had to go with nine to make DeVonta a captain also.

Why do we care?

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Upset alert: first game of the 2023 season.

Pittsburgh wins 

I'm going to " call it"

My division winners

Eagles,  Saints,  Lions,  Seahawks 

Bills, Jaguars,  Steelers, Chargers

 

33 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Yes....because you can't " poach" without putting them on the 53.   Just like we have had the tryouts and still nobody on the 53.    Very smart the way of using the PS this way.  Protect the other guys.

 

Every other team has their P on their 53. Just drop that worse P and pickup a better P instead. Nobody thought our P was better. Right there fir the taking. It isn’t smart to have Siposs as your P going on a third season now. Even with the ease it puts on our 53 man rostering not having to accommodate him.

33 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Well... look at the results.   Our guy really sucks ....really sucks right... why is half the league about a yard difference?  

Obviously whatever potential is there, hasn't been fulfilled.  Probably why there was a huge influx from college to begin with???

Our guy sucks….then chokes!

33 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Yes... 1 yard better. 

This answer just exposes your stubborn ignorance on the subject. Stick by your guy! Stick by how him sucking hadn’t cost us a game yet…so it didn’t matter. Even after it cost us the BIGGEST GAME!

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Every other team has their P on their 53. Just drop that worse P and pickup a better P instead. Nobody thought our P was better. Right there fir the taking. It isn’t smart to have Siposs as your P going on a third season now. Even with the ease it puts on our 53 man rostering not having to accommodate him.

Correct.... everyone already had a punter on 53.  Why make a move if there are a bunch of guys all in that same range.  Wouldn't make sense.  Just like doesn't make sense for us to change until one is clearly better.  So don't use the 53 ...if he gets poached or someone else steps up..you switch. 

It's not complicated. 

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Our guy sucks….then chokes!

It that what happened.... he choked.

26 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

And run the fumble in untouched. 

Returned the choking P shank

3 hours ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I missed the TE run in my league soon at Mark Andrew’s got selected TE got taken like crazy..

Happens,not the end of the world,you have a few extra WR's,maybe trade 1 and your TE to a team that is weaker at WR. I try to cover my bye weeks when drafting to avoid forced choices later. With only 1 TE you're going to have to make a move anyhow on the bye week. When I take my RB3 before WR 2 that usually starts a RB run,which leaves me all kinds of nice WR's,so I double dip those when my turn comes around. I will take WR2 then WR3 back to back. Just works best for me drafting down so far. The strategy is different if you are in the top 5. 4,5,6 are my fav draft spots. my 4 QB's are Fields in 2,Herbert in 1 and Hurts in the other. on 3 teams my BU is Arod,which isn't bad at all. I can stick him in on certain match ups. Already getting trade offers for him coming in 

26 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Why do we care?

Now you speak for all? Ok

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

This answer just exposes your stubborn ignorance on the subject. Stick by your guy! Stick by how him sucking hadn’t cost us a game yet…so it didn’t matter. Even after it cost us the BIGGEST GAME!

Because I don't believe it cost us the game. I believe the Chiefs would have scored 20 times in a row at that point. 

I believe not going for it was the key in the 2nd half....first half was the free 7 points Hurts gave them in-between the 2 drives they punted.

23 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

I'm going to " call it"

My division winners

Eagles,  Saints,  Lions,  Seahawks 

Bills, Jaguars,  Steelers, Chargers

 

Finally….first time putting yourself out there. Way to take some risk. Its much better to be wrong in your predictions than…your usual…,being wrong in hindsight.

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

Because I don't believe it cost us the game. I believe the Chiefs would have scored 20 times in a row at that point. 

I believe not going for it was the key in the 2nd half....first half was the free 7 points Hurts gave them in-between the 2 drives they punted.

Because you are too short sighted to consider all factors…like the clock difference.

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Now you speak for all? Ok

Idk... who here cares who is named captain?

4 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Correct.... everyone already had a punter on 53.  Why make a move if there are a bunch of guys all in that same range.  Wouldn't make sense.  Just like doesn't make sense for us to change until one is clearly better.  So don't use the 53 ...if he gets poached or someone else steps up..you switch. 

It's not complicated. 

There is no "if he gets poached”….he didn’t need to be rostered because he wouldn’t get poached. No danger of such an occurrence. Frankly it would be if assistance to us if anybody was dumb enough to take him from us. Catch up!

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Finally….first time putting yourself out there. Way to take some risk. Its much better to be wrong in your predictions than…your usual…,being wrong in hindsight.

I did it for you... your approval is what I live for.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

There is no "if he gets poached”….he didn’t need to be rostered because he wouldn’t get poached. No danger of such an occurrence. Frankly it would be if assistance to us if anybody was dumb enough to take him from us. Catch up!

another team would have to put him on the 53.  We don't have a punter on there.  Obviously the feeling within the organization is that they are all the same. None worth... I love this word ..." rostering" lol

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Because you are too short sighted to consider all factors…like the clock difference.

KC had to milk the clock at the end.  Right in front of the goal line. At what point don't you feel that they would have gotten the ball back with time to go kick a FG?   

3 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Idk... who here cares who is named captain?

I don’t care if you care…just explained to you why it occurred in case you did care

3 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

I did it for you... your approval is what I live for.

Who here cares what you predict?

3 hours ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Celek when he got used had some damn good games just wasn’t the consistent threat of the top guys which really is what makes TEs so hard to draft 

I look at the top 3 TE's as WR2's for fantasy purposes. I try to get RB1(hopefully a 3 down RB which is getting tough to find),my WR 1 and my TE(depending where I draft) but that usually works out well when you are in 8 and beyond,round 4 I try for RB 2. In the league I mentioned above Sanders is my RB 2,which is fine because they will overuse him. After a few byes go by,I will go what Joe did and snap his BU since they will run Sanders into the ground. round 5,6 is usually where I get my QB. Except I jumped on Hurts drafting 10th. I took my RB 1 at 10 and he was there on the backside,so he was my only round 2 QB. Some drafts are pretty weird LOL. You can tell the rookies right off. They will take a D or kicker in round 7. In that one league I think there were 9 rookies out of 12 because it was TOO easy HAHAHA 

3 hours ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Celek when he got used had some damn good games just wasn’t the consistent threat of the top guys which really is what makes TEs so hard to draft 

I had Ertz a few years starting

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I don’t care if you care…just explained to you why it occurred in case you did care

I asked the question to everyone on here..

DOES ANYONE ON HERE CARE WHO IS NAMED CAPTAIN?