1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

We struggled with Hargrave vs the run...no doubt.   

IDK how we are already struggling when we haven't played yet 🤣

2 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

We struggled with Hargrave vs the run...no doubt.   

Cox and Hargrave clearly wasn’t a great run stopping combination 

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Four year aging WR steady decline you believe is mostly due to QB play?

Who(list the QB's by year and other WR talent at the time) And will you say the same about Zaccheus?

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Wh(list them by year and other WR talent at the time)o were the QB's????? And will you say the same about Zaccheus?

Zac had his best season last year

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Cox and Hargrave clearly wasn’t a great run stopping combination 

WOW struggling already and we haven't even boarded the plane yet. We should just forfeit

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Zac had his best season last year

So why did they let him go? Surely you retain someone like that

10 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

WHat is that?

Any chance of a virus attack with that link?

This is a good game here!!!

2 minutes ago, EaglesTD123 said:

Any chance of a virus attack with that link?

IDK like I said I watched ASG's grandsons game and no alarms went off on my system. Although you know any FREE stream site is not exactly legal LOL

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

WOW struggling already and we haven't even boarded the plane yet. We should just forfeit

You just replied to a post speaking in the past tense about a combination of DT that we no longer can even field. You just looking to disagree with everything.

23 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Zac had his best season last year

Like I said before it really doersn't matter to me either way,but your arguments make no sense. Landry is a good receiver in the slot,so the question really is,is he better than Ward?" or the other 3 we have on the PS? Yes he is aging and not who he once was(few payers are) but he is solid and experienced,so whatever. I'm sometimes sorry I post on here because when you post a POSSIBLITY  it's always NO NAH FORGET IT HE SUCKS,he'll just get here and PRE struggle along with the rest. I didn't write the article and I didn't say I would DIE to get him did I? But because I post it you think I automatically do and it gets tiring after awhile. it was a post about someone we COULD LOOK AT.PERIOD

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You just replied to a post speaking in the past tense about a combination of DT that we no longer can even field. You just looking to disagree with everything.

But this new crew is already "struggling????? We haven't played a damn down yet lmfao

The PRE struggle is REAL!!!!!!

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Like I said before it really doersn't matter to me either way,but you arguments make no sense. Landry is a good receiver in the slot,so the question really is,is he better than Ward?" or the other 3 we have on the PS?

My argument of a player showing very obvious steady decline in performance over the last four years coinciding with aging is about as good and strong as an argument gets against an athlete.

I changed from DTV to Dish and Dish red zone is only 13 bucks a month,so I wont be using that stream anyhow. DTV wanted 350 bucks for a season

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

My argument of a player showing very obvious steady decline in performance over the last four years coinciding with aging is about as good and strong as an argument gets against an athlete.

Like I said I DON'T REALLY CARE EITHER WAY,RIF

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

My argument of a player showing very obvious steady decline in performance over the last four years coinciding with aging is about as good and strong as an argument gets against an athlete.

Yeah tell Cox about that LOL

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

But this new crew is already "struggling????? We haven't played a damn down yet lmfao

I’m sure getting rid of Edwards that was playing at such a high level at MLB for a player hasn’t played in the NFL yet most would assume would lead to ….improvement?

Well it's sad to know we are PRE struggling. I knew we were going 3-14 this year. We're probably PRE struggling in many areas

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

I’m sure getting rid of Edwards that was playing at such a high level at MLB for a player hasn’t played in the NFL yet most would assume would lead to ….improvement?

IDK haven't seen them play yet,neither have you

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Yeah tell Cox about that LOL

You tell your Cox about that…I’m fine!

Our RB's must also be in PRE struggling mode

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Well it's sad to know we are PRE struggling. I knew we were going 3-14 this year. We're probably PRE struggling in any areas

They drafted Davis last year as a priority to help the rush D that was understood to not be a strength. Some understandings and educated guesses are always made ahead of things actually occurring. Like how they assumed Blankenship was taking over a starting S spot,

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

You tell your Cox about that…I’m fine!

OH so age has no bearing eh???? Once again, age is not a good excuse,but I will let you be wrong as often as you want.As far as landry I dont care either way but if hes better than one of the 4 WR on our PS then you take him

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

IDK haven't seen them play yet,neither have you

Well  start Ringo over Slay then