3 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Also if Gains is 3rd string talent that not a great sign then since he clearly outclassed the rest of our RBs all PS and camp hence why he is the 1st man up 

Now comes Ham's "see I told you we needed to overspend on Taylor" speech

6 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

You're behind,are you Greek?

Why does that get you excited in some less than heterosexual ways?

The RB room will stabilize if gains doesn’t produce we will see Swift and even Scott start to take carries from him as it should be.

But won’t matter who is at RB if the OL doesn’t block better and our passing game doesn’t get going. 

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Nope…never said gashed. Misquote from you attributed towards me. But what’s new?

Dodge,deflect,deny,same old same old

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Why does that get you excited in some less than heterosexual ways?

Not me,I think you get it on for Hurts

6 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Did you see the Hurts repeat of the fumble again? Is this going to be commonplace now? That brronze statue you have of him,you need to cut the ball out of his hand and place it on the ground

You miss most everything important that occurs in these games. Not sure you actually watch any of it. Just study stats evidently. It was a fantastic play by the defender. Got to give them credit when do also. He put a huge hit…right on the ball. Was a huge play he made. Well done. Don’t think it mattered who was carrying the ball on that hit.

23 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

The idea that either side isn’t working for mostly the same interests is short sighted. Democrat or republican, which side do you believe isn’t working for the pharmaceutical industry, oil, bankers…..? 

My post wasn't about politics,it was about disrespect,you can go back to sleep now

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You miss most everything important that occurs in these games. Not sure you actually watch any of it. Just study stats evidently. It was a fantastic play by the defender. Got to give them credit when do also. He put a huge hit…right on the ball. Was a huge play he made. Well done. Don’t think it mattered who was carrying the ball on that hit.

Right, yet a turnover is a turnover?? No do overs on those? Those reduce our chances at better O stats and plays?

Interesting hearing Gains is dealing with a rib injury and questionable for Thursday… have to wonder when the injury happened now and IF that is a factor in his play falling off after the start of the game

12 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I'm not going back 50 pages,you clearly said the Pats would gash us,back when I was asking for numbers you refused to post. 

You’d have to go back much for thee than that to find anything to quote from me as gashed. Be from talk about the SB.

11 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Our whole offense looked like 3rd string talent did we not watch the same game? I’m sorry I’m just not overreacting to how bad we were week 1 and definitely not placing blame on just Gains. 

 

10 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Also if Gains is 3rd string talent that not a great sign then since he clearly outclassed the rest of our RBs all PS and camp hence why he is the 1st man up 

Clearly not a great sign. Scott has been a better option all along though. So seems like a Siri biased issue taking place. Was proven fairly clearly that Gains isn’t good enough how we lost the SB. Actually so bad we just took the RB off the field all together.

7 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Dodge,deflect,deny,same old same old

Misquote, not actually watch and pay attention to games, just base everything on stats without context….same old same old

7 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Not me,I think you get it on for Hurts

Not that interested in what you think about. That is disturbing you think about it though.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

 

Clearly not a great sign. Scott has been a better option all along though. So seems like a Siri biased issue taking place. Was proven fairly clearly that Gains isn’t good enough how we lost the SB. Actually so bad we just took the RB off the field all together.

Also been proven pretty clear that Scott is that talented either he usually a no factor in games outside of when we play NYG

On 9/7/2023 at 6:39 PM, cunninghamtheman said:

They can run the ball well. Our run D looking suspect going into week 1. They gash us with the run game …then we have to overcommit to stop it…opening up the passing game and playaction.

So,you never posted this on page 3128? Must have a fake account that was hacked

6 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Right, yet a turnover is a turnover?? No do overs on those? Those reduce our chances at better O stats and plays?

Just stats for you. But when actually watching a laying any attention? You just have to admit it was a fantastic clutch play by the defender. Laid a precise huge hit right on the ball.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Just stats for you. But when actually watching a laying any attention? You just have to admit it was a fantastic clutch play by the defender. Laid a precise huge hit right on the ball.

Yep one less offensive possession

4 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So,you never posted this on page 3128? Must have a fake account that was hacked

Once again caught in a LIE LOL,yet calling ME out for "misquoting"  Comical

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Also been proven pretty clear that Scott is that talented either he usually a no factor in games outside of when we play NYG

Scott isn’t a starter level talent. But you only can base his lack of production on coaches not giving him the opportunity. The RBs sucking in the SB clearly Scott was a better option. Next game, week 1, Gainwell struggling…Scott was a better option. Both games, if not so many more, Scott was the better option but the change wasn’t made…even after proof was playing out so clearly. The biased has been proven. Proven unfounded at that.

Gains last year 53 carries 240 yards 4.5 a carry 

Scott 54 carries 217 yards 4 yards a carry

Idk clearly Scott isn’t all that either not sure how you can even make the claim he is clearly better 

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Scott isn’t a starter level talent. But you only can base his lack of production on coaches not giving him the opportunity

Again stats I just posted he had 1 more carry more then Gains and less yards so they had the same opportunities last year 

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

The RBs sucking in the SB clearly Scott was a better option.

You mean the 2.7 yards a carry he was giving us again not seeing it and not like he was showing he was the better option during the season either 

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Gains last year 53 carries 240 yards 4.5 a carry 

Scott 54 carries 217 yards 4 yards a carry

Idk clearly Scott isn’t all that either not sure how you can even make the claim he is clearly better 

Gains better in the passing game a bit also. Still surprised we didn;t use Penny in a rain game

4 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So,you never posted this on page 3128? Must have a fake account that was hacked

I can see how you misunderstood my post. More correct way to have stated my theory would have been by using a ? instead of …. Just explaining basic football 101 to you once again.

I’m not saying Gains is the guy we should be using just that Scott clearly hasn’t shown anything as to why he is better he has actually shown to be quite a bit worse