4 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

If it was Sanders...why did we go away from him...lol

We didn’t last season. Clearly a huge gap between a legit starter and the rest. Now we just stick to a clear third string ability RB as a starter and workhorse. But let’s just blame Hurts for the O not looking as strong.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Yeah clearly we don’t see things the same. Aliens exist. All these sightings by so many different people all across the world and at different times. Our top fighter pilots have witnessed aliens even. Whole towns.

 Ghosts is a tough one. I don’t think they are imaginary though. Not sure on what all forms they come in though. 
 Bigfoot and Lochness I’m less convinced are real. But now am much more open to looking into their existence since you are so sure they are imaginary. Maybe!

So show me one you have in your collection. Until then they are imaginary

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Yeah clearly we don’t see things the same. Aliens exist. All these sightings by so many different people all across the world and at different times. Our top fighter pilots have witnessed aliens even. Whole towns.

 Ghosts is a tough one. I don’t think they are imaginary though. Not sure on what all forms they come in though. 
 Bigfoot and Lochness I’m less convinced are real. But now am much more open to looking into their existence since you are so sure they are imaginary. Maybe!

You have zero clue how I see things,which is obvious to everyone

4 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

We didn’t last season. Clearly a huge gap between a legit starter and the rest. Now we just stick to a clear third string ability RB as a starter and workhorse. But let’s just blame Hurts for the O not looking as strong.

Please define "legit starter" Is it those pesky stats again??? How many yards did Sanders "gash" ATL for?

5 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Now we just stick to a clear third string ability RB as a starter and workhorse. But let’s just blame Hurts for the O not looking as strong.

I mean Gains didn’t get touched during our punting stretches it was mostly all Hurts… but that’s somehow gainwells fault????

4 carry’s after the 1st series for the rest of the half 

Going out to late lunch,my sides hurt and I can't take anymore foolishness for awhile. I'm going to also go look for "TE's for dummies" so I can send that up to the Linc

7 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

We didn’t last season. Clearly a huge gap between a legit starter and the rest. Now we just stick to a clear third string ability RB as a starter and workhorse. But let’s just blame Hurts for the O not looking as strong.

 

8 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

We didn’t last season. Clearly a huge gap between a legit starter and the rest. Now we just stick to a clear third string ability RB as a starter and workhorse. But let’s just blame Hurts for the O not looking as strong.

 

16 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Mmmmm we won in spite of him vs NE he was doing everything he could to give that game away.

I mean I’m not overreacting he will likely bounce back but there is no hiding how bad he was vs NE 

Yeah that incredible roll out to get a tiny angle to throw a laser past great coverage for a TD to Smitty was in spite of him. Or when he ran for first down converting on long third downs. AJ bobbling the long pass was others overcoming Hurts play.

10 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

We didn’t last season. Clearly a huge gap between a legit starter and the rest. Now we just stick to a clear third string ability RB as a starter and workhorse. But let’s just blame Hurts for the O not looking as strong.

Clearly we need to blame Hurts's college coaches for not having TEs.   

But curious... how long does he get a pass for this?   

10 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

You have zero clue how I see things,which is obvious to everyone

Zero clue how you see things. All evidence points towards conclusions being based on looking at the box score over witnessing the game itself. Knowledge of how the game is played at the NFL level is just clearly limited. Enjoy the game how you like though. You’ve followed something to do with the game much too long to still have the thoughts you clearly demonstrate though.

3 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Clearly we need to blame Hurts's college coaches for not having TEs.   

But curious... how long does he get a pass for this?   

I gave no passes. I labeled it a weakness. But keep false trolling!

4 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Yeah that incredible roll out to get a tiny angle to throw a laser past great coverage for a TD to Smitty was in spite of him. Or when he ran for first down converting on long third downs. AJ bobbling the long pass was others overcoming Hurts play.

Yea because the sack he took that was bailed out by the NE D penalty that even let him throw that Smith TD??? Let’s not bring that up…

the fumble in the 4th on the first play of the drive giving NE the ball? 
 

4th and 3 to seal the game and you fail to covert ? We put the ball in the hands of our best player and he didn’t get it done.

 

So yea I’d say in spite of hurts for this game we won but hey let’s just blame gains 

In 27 games over the last 2 seasons... with Hurts at QB....Goedert has 145 targets...111 catches and 1532 yards

But Hurts not having a TE in college is supposed to be the excuse for 1 target and a bunch of times being wide open but not seen?

College????  Really?   This idea was actually thought, then typed and permanently posted ??     

Really?

WNt to bring up the brutal 2nd qtr where we gained 16 yards and we primarily put the ball in hurts hands to make plays? 

Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said:

WNt to bring up the brutal 2nd qtr where we gained 16 yards and we primarily put the ball in hurts hands to make plays? 

Right.. but he didn't have a TE in college

7 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

 

These two freeze frames maybe point towards another Hurts weakness. He isn’t prototypical size. The best Oline allowing free rushers right in line with his ability to witness an open target. Going with AJ one on one isn’t a bad way to go most of the time.

But again me saying ALL OF THIS about hurts 100% believing we won in spite of his terrible play… I realize it was week 1 and I do think he will bounce back 

You don't pay a guy $250 mil to handoff vs a top run D.    At minimum he should see wide open guys.

Listen it's weak 1..  he sucked...he knows it though as he admitted it. What any Stan boy on here thinks is irrelevant...as long as he corrects things, that's all that matters.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

These two freeze frames maybe point towards another Hurts weakness. He isn’t prototypical size. The best Oline allowing free rushers right in line with his ability to witness an open target. Going with AJ one on one isn’t a bad way to go most of the time.

It was Smith though. 

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

He isn’t prototypical size.

Brees did just fine as did Russell this is just another excuse that shouldn’t be made for Hurts… I don’t ever remember giving Brees this pass 

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

But again me saying ALL OF THIS about hurts 100% believing we won in spite of his terrible play… I realize it was week 1 and I do think he will bounce back 

Agree. 

Just now, joemas6 said:

Agree. 

Also think the usage of the RBs needs to be split up more... nobody should get 10 carries without anyone else getting 5.   Penny needs to play. Really don't see the value with Scott now with another receiving RB. 

3 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

But again me saying ALL OF THIS about hurts 100% believing we won in spite of his terrible play… I realize it was week 1 and I do think he will bounce back 

GM and coaches set us up with Gainwell workhorsing as starting RB. The O didn’t play during the PS. Siri even admitting it was a mistake that showed up. Game events dictated how things unfolded sone what. If we had been down instead of up? I believe the game would have played out much differently. Have a new OC trying to figure things out here. Everybody here really expected him to be peaking at his job week one?

5 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

It was Smith though. 

I’d take Smitty one on one also. Depends which of the two freeze frames you’re referencing.