26 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Been enjoyable seeing Dallas and KC stuff on social media.

Dallas with a ton of posts with stats for Dak and their fans slurp it up.   Every time one pops up I write..." $300 million,  pay him Jerry!"   

KC talking up their CB ..." Pay him, $100 million. "

It cracks me up,  especially with Dallas fans....the same cycle...  they get a player... over hype him after some individual success...then overpay.  

Parsons and Dak are going to get way way overpaid and continue the cycle of their not being able to sign free agents.   

Watch ... those 2 will get half a billion dollars combined in their next contracts. 

They just brought in Gilmore and Brandon Cooks. Weren't free agents but who needs free agency when you can trade for vets like that? 

24 minutes ago, RICWOOFLAIR said:

They just brought in Gilmore and Brandon Cooks. Weren't free agents but who needs free agency when you can trade for vets like that? 

We brought in the heavy hitters in Penny, Mariota, Kentavious Street, Greedy Williams and Edmunds.

11 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

We brought in the heavy hitters in Penny, Mariota, Kentavious Street, Greedy Williams and Edmunds.

We are 9-1... they are 7-3.... 27 years of irrelevance.

We brought in Reddick, Bradberry, Slay, AJ, 

Was it last week...when the top 5 players with receiving yards across the league were 5 guys who were on the Dallas roster 2 years ago?

It's ok.. you do your typical cherry picking of stuff to spin it your way... 30 weeks with the best record in the NFL.

Btw... who caused the 2 turnovers Monday night?    Were they guys brought in by the GM during the season.

They had a great discussion the other day on one of the national shows...." Jerry Jones is old school....old school is saying here is your team, my job is done now getting you players once the season starts...Howie Roseman is the new school... you don't stop adding to the roster once the season starts. "

Dallas was done at the draft...  

You keep hyping up the Dallas and SF moves... the results will speak for themselves.   A team that can win in KC with the QB only producing 179 yards and not throwing a TD.

 

4 hours ago, Asg 15 said:

If Brown is getting double coverage it leaves someone open.

That's just good football

How is it good football when you can only scheme your star WR for 1 catch at 8 yards a game? And while I have nothing against Smith(in fact he was my draft pick that year) It's a pathetic display of "Inept" IDC if he is triple teamed,you can't run a few crossing routes to produce more than 8 yards? That's shameful to me,but keep throwing those 1 yard sideliners that don't work 

3 hours ago, Asg 15 said:

Well folks i'm a grandpa again. Little girl born on the 20th . 4 pounds. Yes 6 weeks premature

Congrats

3 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Play calling was not an issue the last few weeks.  KC game different story.   But like you said, no Goedert makes a difference. 

When I mentioned getting the stud 4th receiving option, you asked " how many balls are there to go around "   I said plenty...because you keep getting 10 yards on 3 plays and you keep the ball.

We didn't get enough people involved Monday....because we didn't keep the ball.   

You can absolutely NEVER have too many weapons on offense...because they all get touches if you keep the ball.  

I said I preferred the 2nd TE over the slot WR...simply because you add an extra blocker...now the 2 TE sets offer a mismatch in the run game.  They have to go big, and so that should create a mismatch for your TEs in coverage.

But ... " we need a DB, RB, LB"  was what everyone else was saying.  No we don't.   Doing fine with these guys... the extra offensive weapon ( especially the 2nd stud TE)  ...then we dominate even more offensively...both run and pass. 

Changes the game.  And the other benefit of having a guy that could play TE 1 if Goedert got hurt. 

That's great with Trotter Jr.... congrats to him.  I want the stud 4th weapon for my $250 mil QB. 

Yeah we do fine against weak teams,but you know we nearly lost to Dullaz by 12 inches and 1 drop vs KC or we would not be 9-1,we would be 7-3. Not very impressive in my view. Those 2 lost the game,we didn't win them. Your 250 million dollar QB should be able to see the open guys we have before adding more he ignores. You can watch the vids and see guys waving their arms and Hurts doesn't see them(I can recall alot of games where Goedert did it). I'm all for adding a decent slot guy or TE,so I see nothing wrong with taking Trotter first. Could be different if we were drafting top 10-12,but we're not and if Trotter is the BPA,which you always push,then you should want him also,but to your point,yeah I can see a top RG pick since Jurgens will be moved eventually. Howie is afraid of defensive skill positions we all know that 

3 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Play calling was not an issue the last few weeks.

Atrocious,so I disagree. Like I said we won in spite of those terrible calls not because of them

Happy Thanksgiving everyone. Then we need to make turkeys out of Buffalo

22 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Atrocious,so I disagree. Like I said we won in spite of those terrible calls not because of them

The play calling the 3 games prior to KC.. you think atrocious?    Yeah we disagree on that for sure.  

Most watched game in NFL history per Eagles Nation

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

The play calling the 3 games prior to KC.. you think atrocious?    Yeah we disagree on that for sure.  

Easy to execute against less than stellar teams. Now the OC gets tested. We nearly lost the last 2

23 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Atrocious,so I disagree. Like I said we won in spite of those terrible calls not because of them

You mentioned the QB not seeing guys...and then you say it's the play calls?   28 vs Dallas... a top D... should have had 50 vs Washington except I guess it was the play calling that made our guys turn the ball over.  Fumble on tush push was play calling?

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Easy to execute against less than stellar teams. Now the OC gets tested. We nearly lost the last 2

Dallas, Miami... the less stellar teams?  You are watching the league this year right? Those are the less stellar teams?

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Easy to execute against less than stellar teams. Now the OC gets tested. We nearly lost the last 2

You nearly lost the last two because of 5 huge drops by KC...the other team's QB messes up at the end... and Washington put up 30 plus points...  that was the defense side of the ball...the offense was putting up points, moving the ball.. and you barely saw the punter.   

Who is our punter anyway?  I seriously don't know the new guy's name?  Probably because I barely see him.

Each game is different.... you have to comment on each game as you see it.  To comment that the OC was a problem the 3 games before KC is just plain nuts.  

KC ...the play calling absolutely could be questioned.  Also first game I thought our guys were the less physical team.

 

26 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

You mentioned the QB not seeing guys...and then you say it's the play calls?   28 vs Dallas... a top D... should have had 50 vs Washington except I guess it was the play calling that made our guys turn the ball over.  Fumble on tush push was play calling?

Both need worked on. Dullaz was missing some key D guys. We have pass catching RB's when have we seen them out on routes especially with Goedert out? How many flair passes to the sideline failed yet we ran them over and over and those failed? We aren't winning the SB with 8 plays

28 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Dallas, Miami... the less stellar teams?  You are watching the league this year right? Those are the less stellar teams?

Dallas missing some key D guys,not shocked we put up 28. ok so Miami vs the other 7. 1:7 is all you have?

29 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

You nearly lost the last two because of 5 huge drops by KC...the other team's QB messes up at the end... and Washington put up 30 plus points...  that was the defense side of the ball...the offense was putting up points, moving the ball.. and you barely saw the punter.   

Who is our punter anyway?  I seriously don't know the new guy's name?  Probably because I barely see him.

Yep drops by KC,they LOST the game,we didn't win it as i said. Dallas was 12 inches from taking us down. I'd rather not count on luck. We could easily be 7-3,do yeah I think we can do better than we are

27 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Each game is different.... you have to comment on each game as you see it.  To comment that the OC was a problem the 3 games before KC is just plain nuts.  

KC ...the play calling absolutely could be questioned.  Also first game I thought our guys were the less physical team.

 

Like I said against weak teams you can do well executing,when you get tougher teams you have to be more creative not run the same play you ran for weeks that worked against the weaker D's. We have lots of assets and we aren't using them. Pass catching RB's,where are the out routes? Why has Hurts regressed seeing his receivers?

5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Both need worked on. Dullaz was missing some key D guys. We have pass catching RB's when have we seen them out on routes especially with Goedert out? How many flair passes to the sideline failed yet we ran them over and over and those failed? We aren't winning the SB with 8 plays

Again.... I'm agreeing with you that play calling vs KC was questionable.   

I'm disagreeing about the 3 games before.... to me, when you barely see the punter, the play calling is fine.  

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Yep drops by KC,they LOST the game,we didn't win it as i said. Dallas was 12 inches from taking us down. I'd rather not count on luck. We could easily be 7-3

Dallas was 12 inches from scoring 30 points.   That's a defensive issue... not playcalling. 

Fins game was better that Dallas and Dallas was better than KC. Just as a fan I find this very weird

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Like I said against weak teams you can do well executing,when you get tougher teams you have to be more creative not run the same play you ran for weeks that worked against the weaker D's

Right...same crap as last year when you complained when we didn't put up 30 ...yet we were limiting the opponent's opportunity to score and won easily. 

Kc ..play calling was an issue....when you go 3 weeks... light up the scoreboard....and have more turnovers than punts... it's not the play calling. 

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

Dallas was 12 inches from scoring 30 points.   That's a defensive issue... not playcalling. 

If the offense was really good, we wouldn't have to be put in that situation,it would be out of reach by that time,but whatever,we aren't going to agree on this,so on the Buffalo and I hope the play calling is better

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

Right...same crap as last year when you complained when we didn't put up 30 ...yet we were limiting the opponent's opportunity to score and won easily. 

Kc ..play calling was an issue....when you go 3 weeks... light up the scoreboard....and have more turnovers than punts... it's not the play calling. 

But I was right about 30 PPG(which is "impossible" according to some). 6-3 is old school we need to crank out the points now