Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Intangible gap Evil Knievel couldn’t have jumped

And it doesn’t matter because if the OL misses a massive block and hit the QBs blind side and he loses the ball it’s still a fumble…. The intangibles isn’t changing that… or we going to act like Hurts doesn’t have a fumbling problem 

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

Didn't Baltimore win?

Yes I already stated I was wrong. Tucker did miss a kick however

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Everyone yammering hot hot Stroud is(and he is) but the Colts have the same record

Colts are a way better team overall though…. Many didn’t see the Texans winning 4 games this year they are way over achieving 

5 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

He is my final take and you can take it how ever you want.

I think Hurts would look equally as bad as Fields on the same exact Bears roster because that is how bad the bears are 

On the flip though I’m not sure Fields would look as good as Hurts if he was on this Eagles team… I do think there are things Hurts does that helps us win 

You already know how I take it.

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Colts are a way better team overall though…. Many didn’t see the Texans winning 4 games this year they are way over achieving 

True,but who got the Colts started on the right track back? I would say Reich had a big hand in that

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/fg_perc_career.htm

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

True,but who got the Colts started on the right track back? I would say Reich had a big hand in that

Didn’t the colts have a strong roster before Reich though I would say Reich got them winning but the roster was still solid before him… Even now the Colts have a good roster just need a coach and QB to get them over the hurdle 

So ask yourself this. After hiring Siri. How would we look if we lost AJ, Swift and Goedert? That's about what Carolina did to Reich except caff was most of their offense

Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Didn’t the colts have a strong roster before Reich though I would say Reich got them winning but the roster was still solid before him… Even now the Colts have a good roster just need a coach and QB to get them over the hurdle 

Let's recall also that(who was their QB that just up and quit?) So they tried many QB's after he left. Shew is a handcuff,maybe he stays as their BU

5 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

And it doesn’t matter because if the OL misses a massive block and hit the QBs blind side and he loses the ball it’s still a fumble…. The intangibles isn’t changing that… or we going to act like Hurts doesn’t have a fumbling problem 

Dickerson isn’t playing well this season…in case you haven’t noticed. Cam Jurgens, Opeta, Steen haven’t played like studs at RG. Driscoll isn’t very good. Hurts has been massively harassed back there this year. Think you might be in a fairytale version of what our Oline has performed like this season.

Five sacks first half against KC. Kelce gave up two of them even.

5 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You already know how I take it.

Because you love to ride Hurt dick so hard you can’t accept any of his faults I do think Hurts is better then Fields I just don’t think Hurts is going to magically make the bears look better…. I do think the rosters they had plays a huge part and the fact Hurts had a far superior OL from the start and better overall roster has added him v Fields.

but as I said I think hurts has aided us in wins that not sure Fields would have if in the same situation I just don’t see Hurts carrying the bears any further then Fields 

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So ask yourself this. After hiring Siri. How would we look if we lost AJ, Swift and Goedert? That's about what Carolina did to Reich except caff was most of their offense

I'm not asking myself those type of questions.  I'm more into not worrying on who to blame....but just giving my coach the players to win.   

I don't want to see any Eagles QB have to try to win with crap.  I'm perfectly fine if the debate continues to be if it's the QB or his weapons that are the reason.  Let's debate this for another decade or so.    

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Because you love to ride Hurt dick so hard you can’t accept any of his faults I do think Hurts is better then Fields I just don’t think Hurts is going to magically make the bears look better…. I do think the rosters they had plays a huge part and the fact Hurts had a far superior OL from the start and better overall roster has added him v Fields.

but as I said I think hurts has aided us in wins that not sure Fields would have if in the same situation I just don’t see Hurts carrying the bears any further then Fields 

I can't laugh AND like this post at the same time LOL

Heck several games even the announcers are just acknowledging the gameplan is Hurts drops backs, avoids the rush, giving time for WR to get open, resets and throws. That’s not too mention how D has to account so heavily for his legs as an option dictating their whole scheme/playcalling. 

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Dickerson isn’t playing well this season…in case you haven’t noticed. Cam Jurgens, Opeta, Steen haven’t played like studs at RG. Driscoll isn’t very good. Hurts has been massively harassed back there this year. Think you might be in a fairytale version of what our Oline has performed like this season.

We are still rated what top 5 in PFF hell think they have us at #2 behind the Lions lol but guess would don’t want to use PFF ranking when it doesn’t aid your narrative lol let’s just stop acting like our OL isn’t by far better then the bears 

3 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

I'm not asking myself those type of questions.  I'm more into not worrying on who to blame....but just giving my coach the players to win.   

I don't want to see any Eagles QB have to try to win with crap.  I'm perfectly fine if the debate continues to be if it's the QB or his weapons that are the reason.  Let's debate this for another decade or so.    

So losing those 3 would not affect Siri? We're just having a discussion. I think Reich was treated like CRAP

KC he changed the playcall and hit Devonta deep bring the main big play of the game. But not just that….He finished it off by running it in the last two yards.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Heck several games even the announcers are just acknowledging the gameplan is Hurts drops backs, avoids the rush, giving time for WR to get open, resets and throws. That’s not too mention how D has to account so heavily for his legs as an option dictating their whole scheme/playcalling. 

Could you image if the Bears actually game planed to use Fields legs something they didn’t do for the entire like first half the season???? That is one of his biggest strengths right 

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

KC he changed the playcall and hit Devonta deep bring the main big play of the game. But not just that….He finished it off by running it in the last two yards.

You mean the under throw that Smirh made a great play on but yup that was all Hurts 

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Could you image if the Bears actually game planed to use Fields legs something they didn’t do for the entire like first half the season???? That is one of his biggest strengths right 

Hurts was total trash for 30 minutes. We can't play 30 and win a SB

Fields has not been 100% most of the year,they try to get him in but perhaps they are rushing him back

And again I do think Hurts is better then Fields but having a BETTER ROSTER ESPECIALLY OL and OCs that are playing to the QB strengths are massive 

Hurts first 1/2 stats(those pesky things that don't matter) 33 passing yards 1 rushing yard(TD) Just AWFUL and that was at HOME. he didn't start playing until Allen started playing LOL

If we play the first 1/2 coming up like we just did the 9ers will kick us into the ocean