So anybody please…but No Mas does my math seem to add up here?

A bunch on the plate just for us to win the division still.

Record : Eags 11-4     Cow 10-5

split head to head

division records tied

common opponent Eags 5-3. Cow 5-4

conference record tied

It’s that freakin close

🤣 36 straight posts by Ham??? Sometimes I post too much,but I really think he is trying hard to catch my post total(or was that General Mills LMAO). Ham needs his own show 🤣 I still want to know what O,D and ST means, since I am a rookie. All I see is a blank like page. It's better that way

Spoiler

(there is no hidden content and I can't delete this LOL)

Win out and see where the chips fall. We actually play better AWAY. Either way we win or lose on the field and I know I am right about this 😆

2 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

🤣 36 straight posts by Ham??? Sometimes I post too much,but I really think he is trying hard to catch my post total(or was that General Mills LMAO). Ham needs his own show 🤣 I still want to know what O,D and ST means, since I am a rookie. All I see is a blank like page. It's better that way

O is Offense

D is Defense

ST is Special Teams

if you actually didn’t understand that all this time

3 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

So anybody please…but No Mas does my math seem to add up here?

Not sure if this came out correctly. Was actually wanting you, No Mas, to see if that looked correct to you. But be good if anybody loooked it over and pointed out what I missed of the scenarios…or just messed up on. Thank you in advance.

5 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Think I’ve clearly stated my point of view about that whole subject…that’s in the past now. I would like to utilize your skills to breakdown the scenarios utilizing your math on the subject of us winning the NFC East possibilities against Dallas. This is what I believe is the most likely important subject with these two games left. If you wouldn’t mind…I would appreciate that.

Very simple.  And I apologize... I had two basketball practices starting at 4 all the way until 7:15.  Just finished eating and getting settled. 

But simple with division.   Obviously we would have to lose in order to tie and force a tiebreaker.  

So here you go... Dallas wins the tiebreakers... either division if we lose to the Giants.  Or conference as they lost 3, we would lose 4.

At 11-6... same.  They win both division record and conference. 

So we need to have a better record than Dallas to win the division now. 

3 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

We lose both games and cowboys beat lions and lose to Wash. we lose division on conference record

To simplify.   The Cowboys win the division if same record.  

3 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Been broken up between doing so many other things here. What scenario am I missing in any of this?

None... Dallas would have the tiebreaker going forward.   It was the Eagles up until the Seattle game.  

Again..that last drive cost us tiebreakers....and allowed the 49ers to lose a game.

The Math has not changed.  It's been the same.   Seattle loss was huge.  

Or as put after the Buffalo game....winning any one of the next 3 kept the Eagles in the driver seat... you pick the game and do the math.  Losing all 3 was and still is....what F@#ked them.   

Win the SF game...would be 2 games ahead of them.  Win the Dallas game... would be 3 ahead of Dallas and one ahead of SF and Detroit.

Win the Seattle game....one ahead of SF... one ahead of Detroit, plus have the tiebreaker... and be 2 ahead of Dallas. 

Can you see now why I was saying just winning one of those 3 was the key?

Nothing has changed.  I'm not proclaiming to be so smart... it was just right there all along.   Because they were head to head matchups with Dallas and SF...and a common opponent of Detroit.  

Not difficult. 

Now no margin for error. ..zero tiebreakers with either of the 3 teams.  

Didn't change. 

1 hour ago, joemas6 said:

None... Dallas would have the tiebreaker going forward.   It was the Eagles up until the Seattle game.  

Again..that last drive cost us tiebreakers....and allowed the 49ers to lose a game.

The Math has not changed.  It's been the same.   Seattle loss was huge.  

Or as put after the Buffalo game....winning any one of the next 3 kept the Eagles in the driver seat... you pick the game and do the math.  Losing all 3 was and still is....what F@#ked them.   

 

55 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Win the SF game...would be 2 games ahead of them.  Win the Dallas game... would be 3 ahead of Dallas and one ahead of SF and Detroit.

Win the Seattle game....one ahead of SF... one ahead of Detroit, plus have the tiebreaker... and be 2 ahead of Dallas. 

Can you see now why I was saying just winning one of those 3 was the key?

Nothing has changed.  I'm not proclaiming to be so smart... it was just right there all along.   Because they were head to head matchups with Dallas and SF...and a common opponent of Detroit.  

Not difficult. 

Now no margin for error. ..zero tiebreakers with either of the 3 teams.  

Didn't change. 

You said one win was needed BEFoRE the Buffalo game. So you aren’t being trueful on that part. Pretty sure you are well aware of it. But you were pointing to winning out after the three games…which included the Seattle game. Obviously a huge bad loss. But I’m just not going to endlessly argue it. I can actually go back and prove it exactly was what you stated if that big of deal. But I think you and everybody here knows I read and consider everything that’s pretty much ever been posted in this section for…,lord knows how long it’s been going on. Rather just move forward if you can agree with the math pointing to a zero percent chance you are changing MY thoughts on this subject ever. More interesting and less frivolous obnoxious subjects of the very near future we could focus and discuss instead of you decided you’d prefer that instead. 

My main points being health and winning the division right now. So I thank you for what seems like confirming and agreeing with the situation we face these last two weeks on that front.

Really didn’t feel simple much at all with just how deep dive the tiebreakers reached to be settled. Having the four opponents dealing with really adds to the…ughh…,well just call it the excitement. The team being down a game being up in the tiebreakers after what many preached for weeks it seemed was that we had the tiebreakers on them instead….flipped….and they lost. Pretty wild in my view really. Not real happy about that fact either. 

Tending to my number one priority of: health ….we are in no position to rest our players to make sure they are healthy for the postseason these last two games. Something many …or probably most fans don’t like the idea of sitting our stars for the last two games of the season I’d assume. But something I very much wanted to have a very exacting understanding of the situation of….to make an informed decision basing on. 

Really top health concern for me is arguably the worst field for players to seemingly avoid injury on…That Meadowlands garbage turf crap. Last game of the season. Took ARod before he started this season.

So I think facing the most injury prone field final game is part of the equation for me. Getting to the point of what we are playing for here. But no doubts here we gotta be full steam ahead against the Cards. If we beat them …and Dallas loses to Detroit. Then we have the division. Now this is not the scenario that gives us top seed I note. But should make everything very clear on just how much it’s really worth having to play our key guys on that trash field in Jersey. Outcome of Detroit v Dallas absolutely being crucial….when considering beyond division to still playing for top seed and such being heavily included. All rolls in together.

Ok so everything resting on? Beat the Cards.  A team I’m not sure if fans are acknowledging or understanding are much tougher opponent for us than if you just look at their record to gauge.

First off their record doesn’t reflect their star QB missing most of the whole season but being in very healthy prime form. I’m not a fan of Murray much myself. Think he’s missing those intangibles I covet and prioritize more than most. But he does have massive athletism and a large arm. Traits many prioritize over all else. 

The Cards have this unheralded up and coming kid Dortch that I could see be a real issue for us. Fans that only view stats alone doubtful would realize the issue he could present for us. They drafted that TE I was high on Trey McBride also. He could be a real issue. Just not sure we can cover a TE for crap. So our bad TE defense magnifies a young talented player really rising right now by the power of ten.

Then comes that mofo Gannon. What coach has an insider knowledge of everything about us more than him really? True answer is Steichen…hahaha….but number two? Gannon. He knows Siri and our players so very well. So could easily see him creating some much larger problems just for us…,he hasn’t been capable of doing to other teams. Just pointing out the unique situation we are facing here. I view the Cards as a much more difficult opponent for us…specifically….than their 3-12 record. I view it all as a problem. Not considering all this….just statements I’ve already heard(and surely will hear more of) from fans just blasting out about how we should easily pummel just some three win team.

39 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

 

You said one win was needed BEFoRE the Buffalo game. So you aren’t being trueful on that part. Pretty sure you are well aware of it. But you were pointing to winning out after the three games…which included the Seattle game. Obviously a huge bad loss. But I’m just not going to endlessly argue it. I can actually go back and prove it exactly was what you stated if that big of deal. But I think you and everybody here knows I read and consider everything that’s pretty much ever been posted in this section for…,lord knows how long it’s been going on. Rather just move forward if you can agree with the math pointing to a zero percent chance you are changing MY thoughts on this subject ever. More interesting and less frivolous obnoxious subjects of the very near future we could focus and discuss instead of you decided you’d prefer that instead. 

Ok...I'm not going to argue.. there was no way I would have said one win before Buffalo because that would have made 4 losses.  The math didn't work with the other teams only having 3 losses. 

I was looking at the tiebreaker scenarios...which were at 3 losses.   

Why would I or anyone due the math where the Eagles would go to 4 losses while the other teams has only 3?  Makes no sense.

Eagles owned every tiebreaker at 3 losses....except for SF...which I repeatedly said...." it forces SF to have to win out." 

17 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Ok...I'm not going to argue.. there was no way I would have said one win before Buffalo because that would have made 4 losses.  The math didn't work with the other teams only having 3 losses. 

I was looking at the tiebreaker scenarios...which were at 3 losses.   

Why would I or anyone due the math where the Eagles would go to 4 losses while the other teams has only 3?  Makes no sense.

You say you aren’t…but then do. What you are spinning now isn’t even what you said. So I’m just not discussing it anymore with you. Carry on