Sanders dropped an easy catch in there to keep us from converting a first down or staying on schedule also.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Second half of Browns game. Sanders run for minus one yard. Three and out. Next drive: after recovering fumble one pass play for TD. Not running it there. Next drive Sanders run one yard. Didn’t get a first down. Next drive: Sanders runs for no gain. Sanders runs for two yards. Then Safety given up. Next drive:Sanders one yard on rush. The wegive up a TD. Down by two scores.

See previous post

WE DIDNT RUN SEE MY POSTS.... Shocker he had -1 yard when he has 1 carry here 1 carry there and two at the goal line when literally everyone knows it’s a run.... whoooo great way to have a successful ground game lol 

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

WE DIDNT RUN SEE MY POSTS.... Shocker he had -1 yard when he has 1 carry here 1 carry there and two at the goal line when literally everyone knows it’s a run.... whoooo great way to have a successful ground game lol 

The runs weren’t successful in the second half. Really hurt us.

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

And sadly it isn’t Doug call on the kicker he can. Say Howie think we need a new kicker and if Howie mmm no I like Elliott Doug has to deal with it

My kicker needs to practice-------------OUTSIDE------------EVERY practice--------------- for at least 30 minutes. Then you can come inside lol

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

The runs weren’t successful in the second half. Really hurt us.

When teams figure out your QB sucks and you can't throw, pretty easy to lock it down. Hurts just changed all that

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

The runs weren’t successful in the second half. Really hurt us.

We didn’t run lol 😂 wow what don’t you get on it we had 5 runs with Sanders and they were all spaced out. Hard to be successful running when you don’t run 

Sanders missed his blocking assignment on a pass. Also dropped two passes if I recall. We stay on schedule with down and distance we could try and run more. RUnning game wasn’t working. And the RB was hurting us in the passing game. Your trying to argue about rushing attempts in a vacuum. That’s what happened. 

Sanders gained 1 yard then we passed twice for a 3 and out 

Sanders got a run on a 2nd down for 1 yard... Then passed twice for a 3 and out 

oh Sanders got two carries backed up at our EZ when everyone knew runs were coming got us two yards from them.

then like two series later we gave him one more run.

Hard to be successful when you don’t run 

Howie won't lose face by trading Wentz and getting his cap in worse shape. We are stuck with Wentz for now. Howie has an ego that doesn't quit, he will ride overpaid losers and suck coaches into the sunset rather than admit he was wrong

Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said:

We didn’t run lol 😂 wow what don’t you get on it we had 5 runs with Sanders and they were all spaced out. Hard to be successful running when you don’t run 

The runs weren’t successful...or we could have run more. Minus one yard carry or plus one yard carries weren’t moving the sticks. They were to blame as much as the other stuff. One of those runs moves the chains we could have another rushing attempt. Couldn’t gain even three yards and a cloud of dust.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Sanders missed his blocking assignment on a pass. Also dropped two passes if I recall. We stay on schedule with down and distance we could try and run more. RUnning game wasn’t working. And the RB was hurting us in the passing game. Your trying to argue about rushing attempts in a vacuum. That’s what happened. 

Running game was working we abandoned it hard to be successful when you don’t run. 

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

The runs weren’t successful...or we could have run more. Minus one yard carry or plus one yard carries weren’t moving the sticks. They were to blame as much as the other stuff. One of those runs moves the chains we could have another rushing attempt. Couldn’t gain even three yards and a cloud of dust.

And neither was passing for incompletions... idk why don’t we try to run the ball couple times in a row instead of 1 run here then another run two series later lmao 

Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Sanders gained 1 yard then we passed twice for a 3 and out 

Sanders got a run on a 2nd down for 1 yard... Then passed twice for a 3 and out 

oh Sanders got two carries backed up at our EZ when everyone knew runs were coming got us two yards from them.

then like two series later we gave him one more run.

Hard to be successful when you don’t run 

So him only gaining one yard creating second and nine isn’t a factor on rushing the ball on second or third down?

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

So him only gaining one yard creating second and nine isn’t a factor on rushing the ball on second or third down?

Idk trying running again could’ve picked up 5-6 yards.... Not running the ball getting in a rhythm isn’t a factor 

Ham,with Wentz at the helm we always started games running. Then due to picks, fumbles and assorted BS bonehead plays,we would get behind, then in an effort to "get back in it" we would abandon the run, allowing Wentz to make more bonehead mistakes, putting us further behind. Just a little turd that snowballed into a fertilzer factory

You are b1tch1ing about not running in the second half. We ran...totally unsuccessfully. One yard runs contributed to not converting first downs. So you don’t get another opportunity to run. Sanders failures in the passing game limited chances to run the ball. Just the way that second half went.

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Idk trying running again could’ve picked up 5-6 yards.... Not running the ball getting in a rhythm isn’t a factor 

Based on what? Every other second half carry that gained nothing?

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Ham,with Wentz at the helm we always started games running. Then due to picks, fumbles and assorted BS bonehead plays,we would get behind, then in an effort to "get back in it" we would abandon the run, allowing Wentz to make more bonehead mistakes, putting us further behind. Just a little turd that snowballed into a fertilzer factory

Assorted boneheaded plays especially. But this is a fair assessment.

6 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Running game was working we abandoned it hard to be successful when you don’t run. 

And neither was passing for incompletions... idk why don’t we try to run the ball couple times in a row instead of 1 run here then another run two series later lmao 

Because we were falling behind on down and distance. I’d argue the one yard runs forced us to pass even when we didn’t really want to. 

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You are b1tch1ing about not running in the second half. We ran...totally unsuccessfully. One yard runs contributed to not converting first downs. So you don’t get another opportunity to run. Sanders failures in the passing game limited chances to run the ball. Just the way that second half went.

Based on what? Every other second half carry that gained nothing?

Based on idk the entire first half of successful running... not the spaced out 1 carry Sanders would get a drive 

We recovered that fumble on Cox big play. One play strike to Rodgers for a TD. Not running on that series.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Because we were falling behind on down and distance. I’d argue the one yard runs forced us to pass even when we didn’t really want to. 

Because we WOULDNT RUN!!!! We wouldn’t even try an d string runs together we ran 1 time the. Well let’s pass hard to get going if you don’t. Run 

Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Based on idk the entire first half of successful running... not the spaced out 1 carry Sanders would get a drive 

If you take the first down carry for only one yard...or lose yardage...that forces the playcallers hand I’d say

Then we were down by two scores in the fourth. Hard to run then 

If Sanders picked up 5 yards on first down are you more likely to be able to run on second down? If you pick up nothing running on first down are you more likely to pass on second and ten?

That was the situation

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

If you take the first down carry for only one yard...or lose yardage...that forces the playcallers hand I’d say

Then we were down by two scores in the fourth. Hard to run then 

I don’t I’ve seen numerous teams gain a yard on first and I know what they ran it again on 2nd for more yards... we abandoned the run and it’s hRd for a RB and OL to get going if you don’t actually run 

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I don’t I’ve seen numerous teams gain a yard on first and I know what they ran it again on 2nd for more yards... we abandoned the run and it’s hRd for a RB and OL to get going if you don’t actually run 

It’s hard to have a bunch of rushes when you don’t convert first downs. I’d say that running the ball for minus one, no gain or only one yard put us in that position. Successful runs would have lead to more rushing attempts. Fairly obvious.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

It’s hard to have a bunch of rushes when you don’t convert first downs. I’d say that running the ball for minus one, no gain or only one yard put us in that position. Successful runs would have lead to more rushing attempts. Fairly obvious.

Hard to covert first downs when you keep passing and keeping yourself in terrible spots on 3rd down... I can go in this circle ⭕️ all day