Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I had high hopes for Howard’s return. He just doesn’t look good though. We need a third RB. Clement does a little on ST and blocks. Not enough for what I think we need. Huntley has perfected taking up a roster spot this season. That’s all I can say about him. We need to get another RB. We need a guy that can take over as the number two. Handle the load if Sanders is out. But also a complimentary style. Really like Scott much better as the third Rb. 

Yep,got one in my mock(if you checked it out). See I am always head of things(pats self on back)

  • Replies 89.6k
  • Views 2.3m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

3 hours ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Reps are reps are reps... Hurts getting game reps is always a good thing... As for Wentz a bigger slap in his face would be having him start. Starting Hurts is no different then when we pulled Wentz 3 weeks ago. 
 

As for the off-season as I stated before  Doug Lurie Howie need to sit down make a decision at QB and move forward. I’d trade the other guy whether it’s Wentz or Hurts.

IDK reps and reps and reps didn' do much for Wentz did they?

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Could go WR Chase in one, The U TE(does it really matter what his name is?) in two and RB Najee Harris in the third. 

Harris wont be there in 3. I'm going CB in 1,the hoping Olave is there in 2 and in 3 I am getting a solid guy for our O line for the next decade(Deonte Brown-OG-Bama)

1 hour ago, jsb235 said:

I think Parsons is really good, but a wr (Chase) or a corner (Surtain) or an edge rusher (Rousseau) makes so much more sense for this team, and one of them should be there when we pick.

I'm in on Surtain

3 hours ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Reps are reps are reps... Hurts getting game reps is always a good thing... As for Wentz a bigger slap in his face would be having him start. Starting Hurts is no different then when we pulled Wentz 3 weeks ago. 
 

As for the off-season as I stated before  Doug Lurie Howie need to sit down make a decision at QB and move forward. I’d trade the other guy whether it’s Wentz or Hurts.

Starting Wentz today would accomplish 2 things 1) If he plays well he becomes more tradable 2) Could give him the confidence to try and win his job back(we can always pull him and put Hurts in yes???) So now what if Hurts is sucking rocks? At this point do you really want to win this game??? I WOULD want to win this game if I see Wentz got his mojo back and he's fixed and he will be here next season. But you won't know that sitting him will ya? Ped needs to THINK more.This is a great opportunity to ANSWER questions we have, but nah, to hell with that

13 minutes ago, jsb235 said:

Adam Schefter on Twitter: "Eagles' CB Nickell Robey-Coleman and a practice-squad player tested positive and both players will go on the Reserve/COVID list today, per source. Robey-Coleman now will miss tonight's game against the WFT." / Twitter

I think we will get to see Elijah Riley at slot corner, which I am looking forward to. He could be a sleeper. I also expect Grayland Arnold to get a lot of time at outside corner since Jacquet is injured.

99.9% survive and the ones that die are usually because they have other issues. Healthy people have more risk of dying in a car wreck on the way to the stadium. This covid list thing is BS.Give them the vac and let's play ball-jebus

BTW I also think DeVonta Smith is every bit as good as Chase,maybe even better. I will wait until round 2 to add my WR(Olave or Chase's teammate Terrance Marshall). 2 RB's I am looking at(late picks) Jamir White-Georgia and trey Sermon-Ohio st(MAN this kids runs HARD)

1 hour ago, jsb235 said:

I think Parsons is really good, but a wr (Chase) or a corner (Surtain) or an edge rusher (Rousseau) makes so much more sense for this team, and one of them should be there when we pick.

Outside of CB not sure the other make more sense then Parsons.... Honestly LB is probably the weakest spot on our D in my eyes... Could make the case for CB #2 but in a new scheme that might actually aid the CBs not leave them on islands alone as much could drastically improve the play. 
 

DL definitely need to address they are old but we do have guys at this moment it was a unit that got sacks. 

9 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Starting Wentz today would accomplish 2 things 1) If he plays well he becomes more tradable 2) Could give him the confidence to try and win his job back

He is already being ask for by teams so he is already trade able and you risk more putting him behind that terrible OL and getting hurt then he won’t be traded at all.

Playing Hurts gives you another look at him and help your decision in the off-season on what to do. Is Hurts your QB of the future???? Do you try and salvage Wentz??? If none of these are an option do you look at drafting a new QB????

Eagles have a huge off-season ahead of them with tons of decision that have to be made 

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Or could switch and go Rousseau, Kendrick then Jabril Cox

Had Cox penciled in,then went another way. I am picking up my under the radar LB Micah McFadden-Indiana in round 6. He's better than a round 6 IMO

 

2 hours ago, time2rock said:

 

You stated: "He drew it up as they ran it in HS ... ".  But yeah I agree, a lot of plays are "borrowed".  

Exactly, he showed them the way they ran it in HS.(drew it up the way his high school used it) There are many variations of the play design. Bears ran it a year before, just a little different. 

1-6- Surtain-CB-Bama     2-37- Olave-WR-Ohio St.    3-70-Deonte Brown-OG-Bama  5-134-Jamir White-RB-Georgia  5-140- I can either take Jimmy Morrissey-C-Pitt or pick up another CB in Greg newsome-Northwestern. I need to know what Kelces plans are  6-165-Micah McFadden-ILB-Indiana  7-198-Tommy Togai DL3 tech- Ohio st.

5 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

He is already being ask for by teams so he is already trade able and you risk more putting him behind that terrible OL and getting hurt then he won’t be traded at all.

Playing Hurts gives you another look at him and help your decision in the off-season on what to do. Is Hurts your QB of the future???? Do you try and salvage Wentz??? If none of these are an option do you look at drafting a new QB????

Eagles have a huge off-season ahead of them with tons of decision that have to be made 

So Wentz could get hurt but Hurts can't-got it

8 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

He is already being ask for by teams so he is already trade able and you risk more putting him behind that terrible OL and getting hurt then he won’t be traded at all.

Playing Hurts gives you another look at him and help your decision in the off-season on what to do. Is Hurts your QB of the future???? Do you try and salvage Wentz??? If none of these are an option do you look at drafting a new QB????

Eagles have a huge off-season ahead of them with tons of decision that have to be made 

IDK could we trade Wentz and get the QB from BYU(who most think is #3 QB in this draft) Then we would be relying on basically 2 rooks,which may not be a bad thing to do, but one of them would need to emerge. I think we take Zac Thomas(appalacian st) as a UDFA QB. I would

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So Wentz could get hurt but Hurts can't-got it

If your want to trade Wentz his risk of injury is way more concerning... On top of the fact that he already has a track record of injuries and isn’t anywhere near as mobile as Hurts to avoid pressure 

5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

1-6- Surtain-CB-Bama     2-37- Olave-WR-Ohio St.    3-70-Deonte Brown-OG-Bama  5-134-Jamir White-RB-Georgia  5-140- I can either take Jimmy Morrissey-C-Pitt or pick up another CB in Greg newsome-Northwestern. I need to know what Kelces plans are  6-165-Micah McFadden-ILB-Indiana  7-198-Tommy Togai DL3 tech- Ohio st.

Sorry,but(even being biased) this draft would help us out a TON

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

If your want to trade Wentz his risk of injury is way more concerning... On top of the fact that he already has a track record of injuries and isn’t anywhere near as mobile as Hurts to avoid pressure 

yeah,they are all mobile,until they get caught lol(see RG3)

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

yeah,they are all mobile,until they get caught lol(see RG3)

Hurts needs reps and Eagles need to see more of what he can do we could be picking as high a 3rd in this draft. Need to know if Hurts is your QB or not especially if Wentz wants out and we trade him.

In the above mock we have 1)added a top flight CB, 2)we have added an excellent WR to our stable 3) we have a starting OG and can quit F ing around for a change. he will be solid for a decade 4) Added a nice RBBC RB, who can compliment Sanders,or pull the weight in his absence 5) if Kelce retires,we need a sold C for a decade, they guy we have is a camp body.If he stays,then we can add another decent CB(this is yet to be decided) 6) McFadden is good enough and an upgrade to out LB position 7) This guy is also underrated,he is a solid young DL 3 tech(which we play) and a nice future addition. UDFA- Zac Thomas-QB. Going late of as a UDFA due to the small school,but this kid can play 

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Hurts needs reps and Eagles need to see more of what he can do we could be picking as high a 3rd in this draft. Need to know if Hurts is your QB or not especially if Wentz wants out and we trade him.

SO you put Hurts in,then tell him to lose? Is that wise? We are not fighting for a playoff spot,we are fighting for the best draft spot.if Hurts lights it up and we win, we LOSE. If you put Wentz in and we win,you know he can DO IT AGAIN. I will take the latter because I need that question answered because of the MASSIVE amount I am paying out. I will have Hurts for 3 more years to find out if he's good or not

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

This guy is also underrated,he is a solid young DL 3 tech(which we play) and a nice future addition.

Schwartz is supposedly retiring and likely have a new DC can’t say what scheme we play yet 

3 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Schwartz is supposedly retiring and likely have a new DC can’t say what scheme we play yet 

Won't change because------------if you are doing a complete changeover you will need the CAP SPACE to go out in FA and get those players you need to replace and we DONT have that

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

SO you put Hurts in,then tell him to lose? Is that wise? We are not fighting for a playoff spot,we are fighting for the best draft spot.if Hurts lights it up and we win, we LOSE. If you put Wentz in and we win,you know he can DO IT AGAIN. I will take the latter because I need that question answered because of the MASSIVE amount I am paying out. I will have Hurts for 3 more years to find out if he's good or not

I put Hurts in and say play if we lose we lose if we win we win... I never tell players to lose.

Lmao as for Wentz the question isn’t if Wentz can win if you haven’t figured out he can win by now something is wrong the question is can you repair the relationship between him and staff. If Wentz wants out that likely it sure we could keep him around force him to finish his contract but just going to have a disgruntled player on roster. 
 

So yea think figuring out what I have in Hurts is way more important 

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Won't change because------------if you are doing a complete changeover you will need the CAP SPACE to go out in FA and get those players you need to replace and we DONT have that

Lmao 😂 can completely change we run a wide 9 now new coach might not run that... We have the pieces in place already to put together a solid 34 D if that’s what we want. 
 

There is no way to say what we will ask from our D players with a new coach they likely will not be asked to do the same things by a new coach 

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I put Hurts in and say play if we lose we lose if we win we win... I never tell players to lose.

Right,so if we win we lose lol. I in round 1 every pick is worth more than the next. The higher you pick,the more compensation you can demand in a trade back scenario no?

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Lmao 😂 can completely change we run a wide 9 now new coach might not run that... We have the pieces in place already to put together a solid 34 D if that’s what we want. 
 

There is no way to say what we will ask from our D players with a new coach they likely will not be asked to do the same things by a new coach 

it's a 7th round pick bud. I don't think he makes that big a deal do you?????? Besides a good 3 tech DL can play in either scenario

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Right,so if we win we lose lol. I in round 1 every pick is worth more than the next. The higher you pick,the more compensation you can demand in a trade back scenario no?

Lmao so your going to put Wentz in and say lose but you want to see if he can win man you make zero sense 

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

it's a 7th round pick bud. I don't think he makes that big a deal do you?????? Besides a good 3 tech DL can play in either scenario

Oh but he is fixing our DL problems lol but he is a 7th round pick 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.