Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Lmao so your going to put Wentz in and say lose but you want to see if he can win man you make zero sense 

No,it makes total sense.If Wentz wins and looks great doing it, then it's worth the ONE spot we may lose in the draft. If Hurts wins,it "hurts" Sorry you can't understand the logic

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

No,it makes total sense.If Wentz wins and looks great doing it, then it's worth the ONE spot we may lose in the draft. If Hurts wins,it "hurts" Sorry you can't understand the logic

And if Hurts plays great and wins it shows that maybe this is year guy of the future and don’t need to draft QB if he is terrible then you might be seriously looking at QB sitting in the top 5 

I’m sorry you can’t understand that logic 

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

And if Hurts plays great and wins it shows that maybe this is year guy of the future and don’t need to draft QB if he is terrible then you might be seriously looking at QB sitting in the top 5 

I have 3 more years to figure that out,why do I need to know that today? He did well 2 games,then sucked. Todays game has no bearing on if he's good or bad,because have already seen both and I don;t thinki Ped decides TODAY that Hurts is the future of our franchise

5 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I’m sorry you can’t understand that logic 

OH great so now we draft another QB,that MAY be good(or not). I'm not taking that risk. It's TOO EARLY to know if Hurts is the future or not, drafting another in round 1 just muddies the already muddy water. So,including todays game you have FOUR games to decide your future? That's insane

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

OH great so now we draft another QB,that MAY be good(or not). I'm not taking that risk. It's TOO EARLY to know if Hurts is the future or not, drafting another in round 1 just muddies the already muddy water. So,including todays game you have FOUR games to decide your future? That's insane

And that the problem you rather gamble that hurts is the future and be terrible next year as the starter that smart...I’d much rather get as much tape and info as hurts as I can to make decision 

SO,it is MY OPINION if we played Wentz and he balled and we won, that would be worth it because that would help my decision making. If Hurts balled and won,it really doesn't tell me any more than I already know or can't find out in the offseason. But Ped already said Hurts is starting,so the point is mott,but I still think he(Ped) is making another mistake

6 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I have 3 more years to figure that out,why do I need to know that today? He did well 2 games,then sucked. Todays game has no bearing on if he's good or bad,because have already seen both and I don;t thinki Ped decides TODAY that Hurts is the future of our franchise

Because reality is he has to Wentz could be gone good chance Wentz wants out and if that’s the case we likely trade him... that leaves you Hurts if your Doug do soy risk your job on Hurts being your QB that a huge decision 

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

And that the problem you rather gamble that hurts is the future and be terrible next year as the starter that smart...I’d much rather get as much tape and info as hurts as I can to make decision 

1 game isn't going to alter what you think of Hurts. I need to know if Wentz is going to be here next year or not.if he sucks today(if we played him) THEN my decision gets MUCH easier

And if you don’t believe in hurts then you have to options do everything in your power to salvage the relationship with Wentz( I’d image that would include trading hurts) or go the draft route 

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Because reality is he has to Wentz could be gone good chance Wentz wants out and if that’s the case we likely trade him... that leaves you Hurts if your Doug do soy risk your job on Hurts being your QB that a huge decision 

Well it's a tough decision either way. I'm just saying give me one more REAL time game with Wentz in,because that will make my decision easier. With Hurts starting all you have is the last game Wentz played to go by. For me, I want that last "audition" from Wentz

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

1 game isn't going to alter what you think of Hurts. I need to know if Wentz is going to be here next year or not.if he sucks today(if we played him) THEN my decision gets MUCH easier

If you don’t have a sense of Wentz in 4-5 years now 1 game behind backups isn’t changing anything and if you are influenced by that one game that even more an issue in my eyes 

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

And if you don’t believe in hurts then you have to options do everything in your power to salvage the relationship with Wentz( I’d image that would include trading hurts) or go the draft route 

Nah, no need to trade Hurts. we have him for 3 years. even as a #2 I would hold on for that

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Nah, no need to trade Hurts. we have him for 3 years. even as a #2 I would hold on for that

Completely disagree it isn’t about the contract it’s about the relationship with Wentz if you opt for him to stay your QB 

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

If you don’t have a sense of Wentz in 4-5 years now 1 game behind backups isn’t changing anything and if you are influenced by that one game that even more an issue in my eyes 

QB's are only as good as their last game and I need to see either a HOT Wentz,or the same BS Wentz,in which case I pull him out AGAIN and put Hurts in.In any event what do you lose by starting Wentz even if you have to pull him again???

3 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Completely disagree it isn’t about the contract it’s about the relationship with Wentz if you opt for him to stay your QB 

What does Hurts have to do with your relationship with Wentz? Hurts either starts or he doesn't. With Hurts starting,we already know the relationship is over. I would start him(Wentz) pull him if I needed to. I see no downside to doing that At that point my decision just got alot easier and I know what we need to do with Wentz now, no more guesswork

8 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

And if you don’t believe in hurts then you have to options do everything in your power to salvage the relationship with Wentz( I’d image that would include trading hurts) or go the draft route 

How can you "believe" or not believe after 4 games as a rookie? Drafting another one gives you another rookie lol(but we "believe" in that guy now?)

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

What does Hurts have to do with your relationship with Wentz? Hurts either starts or he doesn't. With Hurts starting,we already know the relationship is over. I would start him(Wentz) pull him if I needed to. I see no downside to doing that At that point my decision just got alot easier and I know what we need to do with Wentz now, no more guesswork

You don’t think the drafting of hurts effected him??? You don’t think going into next season him having to look over his shoulder if he has any little mistakes will bother him??? 
 

it’s not that hard to figure out 

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

How can you "believe" or not believe after 4 games as a rookie? Drafting another one gives you another rookie lol(but we "believe" in that guy now?)

Same way you drafted Wentz and believed his was your guy back in the day or the team that drafted Manning.. Or how the Jags feel about Lawrence.... 

But by that logic we should never dractvrookies can’t believe in any of them just take vets 

So,if Hurts sucks,do you put Wentz in????(assuming you want to win the game) And if Wentz does well then what's your call as to the QB situation? To me that is working things in reverse

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

You don’t think the drafting of hurts effected him??? You don’t think going into next season him having to look over his shoulder if he has any little mistakes will bother him??? 
 

it’s not that hard to figure out 

Then we drafted the wrong guy if he thinks the job will be handed to him.If thats the case then he needs to go no matter

If a guy that lead playoff teams is so worried about a ROOKIE, that he throws league leading picks and takes league leading sacks, then we got the wrong guy to begin with

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Then we drafted the wrong guy if he thinks the job will be handed to him.If thats the case then he needs to go no matter

That your opinion but won’t effect Wentz at all he got paid he has the leverage and teams already calling for him. As I stated good chance Wentz is gone hence why I want to get as much tape on Hurts as possible 

4 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Same way you drafted Wentz and believed his was your guy back in the day or the team that drafted Manning.. Or how the Jags feel about Lawrence.... 

But by that logic we should never dractvrookies can’t believe in any of them just take vets 

We pretty much had no choice because we had noone else. We knew Foles was going away. We had to believe because that was our only option

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

We pretty much had no choice because we had noone else. We knew Foles was going away. We had to believe because that was our only option

We had Bradford we didn’t have to believe in Wentz you make that call as a team lol... You draft guys because you believe in them 

3 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

That your opinion but won’t effect Wentz at all he got paid he has the leverage and teams already calling for him. As I stated good chance Wentz is gone hence why I want to get as much tape on Hurts as possible 

Then the decision has already been made and seeing 1 more game from Hurts makes ZERO difference,since he will start next year no matter  and the team makeup will be different

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

We had Bradford we didn’t have to believe in Wentz you make that call as a team lol... You draft guys because you believe in them 

"Bradford is our QB" Until the day we traded him lol