Jump to content

Featured Replies

Biggest disappointments to me this season. The Saints.  Green Bay had it, but that was a couple of fluke mistakes... the Saints really didn't look good at all for a while down the stretch, including the Eagles game. 

Seattle... don't know what happened to Wilson, can't say he didn't have the WRs.  

Buffalo I guess was my team that I thought would have Tampa results.  You could see last year the impact a #1 WR would have on the rest, plus their OL was getting better.  To me they need a run game to take the next step. 

Next year, I can see the Giants making big strides with a big weapon added. 

  • Replies 89.6k
  • Views 2.3m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

I love the youth in the coaching staff.    If I had to pick my ideal scenario... keep one coach (would be Stout) and go young everywhere else.  Like the diversity and the backgrounds of each.  Still need players though.  

BTW... just for Ham ... I hope Jason Peters gets paid well and plays 12 games for his next team.  would be ironic if we get a comp pick in the 2022 draft for him, considering he hung on a few years too long here...lol

 

I'M feeling 100 times better about not taking a WR early. I am seeing amazing plays from "no name" guys like Yeboah(Ole Miss) Grimes(FL) etc and they aren't playing with their usual QB's. These are all late picks or UDFA's. This WR class is tremendous!!!!! and so DEEP you can get contributors as UDFA's. I don't recall me ever thinking that  before

2 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Saints, Green Bay, Seattle... KC.  I had Tampa who was 7-9... at 10-11 wins but behind the other teams.  Didn't see the Saints fizzle especially Thomas and Brees in the way they did. 

I had Seattle, NO, KC, and Baltimore as final 4.

Oh well, 1 out of 4 isn’t bad!  :lol:

 

4 minutes ago, time2rock said:

I had Seattle, NO, KC, and Baltimore as final 4.

Oh well, 1 out of 4 isn’t bad!  :lol:

 

LOL, I had Pittsburgh.They really screwed up the end of their season

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LOL, I had Pittsburgh.They really screwed up the end of their season

My god that team fell and they fell hard didn't they. 

My vote for COTY is McDermott.

2 minutes ago, UK_EaglesFan89 said:

My god that team fell and they fell hard didn't they. 

I was SHOCKED

14 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LOL, I had Pittsburgh.They really screwed up the end of their season

Crazy how they were on such a tear then got into a funk and couldn’t get out of it.  Just kept getting worse.  

So ,here is the GBNC "plan" based on ALOT of help from all you guys(JMO). Draft- 1-Pitts-TE(Ham), 2-Moehrig-S(guys mock I posted and checked out), 3-Cox-LB(Me and Ham), 5-Rashad Weaver- edge (me), Trevon Grimes(me), Camryn Bynum-CB-Cal(guys mock I posted), Al Blades-CB-Miami(me).      Free agency- Marlon Mack-RB (93)        UDFA(my research)- TJ Vasher-WR, Demitruis Taylor- DL, Brady White-QB, Rakeem Boyd-RB, probably some O line and other DT's in here as well     I know it will take more than one draft/offseason, but all this sounds like a GREAT start!!!! Doing this we don't need to spend alot(cause we wont have it anyway lol).Hey,it's a PLAN HAHA

12 minutes ago, time2rock said:

Crazy how they were on such a tear then got into a funk and couldn’t get out of it.  Just kept getting worse.  

LMAO yeah we STARTED that way and never got back lol. I think Conner going out really screwed them all up

27 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LOL, I had Pittsburgh.They really screwed up the end of their season

IDK, they looked good early, but a lot was their schedule... which not only was so easy early... and tougher teams late... but the days of the week where games were switched was ridiculous.  

33 minutes ago, time2rock said:

I had Seattle, NO, KC, and Baltimore as final 4.

Oh well, 1 out of 4 isn’t bad!  :lol:

 

I'm not sold on the running QB ... Jackson is a freak athlete, but I don't like that style offense for the NFL.   1 guy can't beat 11.   Why I'm not a fan of Hurts for us.  

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

IDK, they looked good early, but a lot was their schedule... which not only was so easy early... and tougher teams late... but the days of the week where games were switched was ridiculous.  

Yeah,they sure lost their "poise" (maybe through no fault of their own)

13 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So ,here is the GBNC "plan" based on ALOT of help from all you guys(JMO). Draft- 1-Pitts-TE(Ham), 2-Moehrig-S(guys mock I posted and checked out), 3-Cox-LB(Me and Ham), 5-Rashad Weaver- edge (me), Trevon Grimes-WR(me), Camryn Bynum-CB-Cal(guys mock I posted), Al Blades-CB-Miami(me).      Free agency- Marlon Mack-RB (93)        UDFA(my research)- TJ Vasher-WR, Demitruis Taylor- DL, Brady White-QB, Rakeem Boyd-RB, probably some O line and other DT's in here as well     I know it will take more than one draft/offseason, but all this sounds like a GREAT start!!!! Doing this we don't need to spend alot(cause we wont have it anyway lol).Hey,it's a PLAN HAHA

I'll put my plan up against anyones

Theory/rationale (if I have any)- Moehrig and Cox will certainly help our middle of the field short game defense . Pitts and Geodert-I don't think I need to explain what that would bring.Rashad Weaver-Youth injection on the D line who could help our pass rush (thus the later CB's because we have to sacrifice somewhere). Grimes- Maybe not a "star" but he is capable enough to be the bookend for Reagor, at least for now. Bynum and Blades are both pretty nice CB's with upside and I think one could work their way into starting early in the season and with Slay and Moehrig,this is an immediate improvement both in youth and talent in the secondary . Marlon Mack-great RBBC guy to put with Sanders and Scott and our coach already knows what he can do. My UDFA's- many others,just personal choice. Alot of nice WR's also that won't get drafted here. Rakeem Boyd. he can learn behind Mack and Sanders and although not a "Stud" I think he can play in a RBBC backfield for a long time. Any picks for Ertz or whomever would just be adding to this. Taking White at QB(or Zac Thomas) means we can lose(and save) the salary for Suds.

I'll take him

Like this guy just fine. At around 1:25 he even takes on my WR choice lol. even in round 7,this guy could be a nice add in time

FB_IMG_1612049243186.jpg

4 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Another young minority coach hired. Youngest coordinator in the league.  

Btw, local article back on the " Sirianni is here for Wentz" idea.  I'm sure it will flip again soon with another hire... the local media is hilarious 

Pathetic would be more accurate

1 hour ago, joemas6 said:

FB_IMG_1612049243186.jpg

"2 weeks to flatten the curve"🤣

Tossing this out FWIW. We all understand the "smoke and mirrors" and outright lies we hear. So,I did a few BS mocks just cause I am bored. Supposing we hang onto Wentz(basically because we have to lol) Trask was there in round 2 of all the mocks I tried.(Stay with me here). If we used my last mock and we took Pitts in 1,Trask in 2 and Grimes in 5, would you be against that? (AKA gearing up for Wentz's departure after the 2021 season no matter what BS you hear). All 3 have time together(Gators),so was wondering what everyone thought about it. Trask threw for (if I recall) 4600 yards this year and he looked good in the senior bowl. That would give us Trask, Hurts and my UDFA snag of White as QB's. Also allows both Trask and Hurts to sit a year behind Wentz. If Wentz balls out,NP. If he's shaky again,we are good to let him go. Despite "pissing him off again" he would need to perform if he wants to play somewhere else. Opinions?  The big ? is if he lasts until round 2(which seems doubtful to me)

6 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Tossing this out FWIW. We all understand the "smoke and mirrors" and outright lies we hear. So,I did a few BS mocks just cause I am bored. Supposing we hang onto Wentz(basically because we have to lol) Trask was there in round 2 of all the mocks I tried.(Stay with me here). If we used my last mock and we took Pitts in 1,Trask in 2 and Grimes in 5, would you be against that? (AKA gearing up for Wentz's departure after the 2021 season no matter what BS you hear). All 3 have time together(Gators),so was wondering what everyone thought about it. Trask threw for (if I recall) 4600 yards this year and he looked good in the senior bowl. That would give us Trask, Hurts and my UDFA snag of White as QB's. Also allows both Trask and Hurts to sit a year behind Wentz. If Wentz balls out,NP. If he's shaky again,we are good to let him go. Despite "pissing him off again" he would need to perform if he wants to play somewhere else. Opinions?  The big ? is if he lasts until round 2(which seems doubtful to me)

I go build the rest of the team... if it's rebuild use Hurts.  Only way I get a QB early is if Wentz goes and that drafted guy is the plan.  If Wentz stays, you get him all the help you can. That help gets inherited by either Hurts or the next guy anyway.   

Using 2 early picks on QB ...2 years in a row after paying your " franchise guy"  what's the point?    If he does well , it's a waste, if not then that is 2 players that could have helped him.  You look worse when he succeeds elsewhere. 

Stafford to the Rams. Rams gave up two future 1sts 22 and 23, a 3rd and Goff for him.

23 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Stafford to the Rams. Rams gave up two future 1sts 22 and 23, a 3rd and Goff for him.

Should wentz be worried ? I think he should be more worried today than he was yesterday. The rams have shown the way out of a bad contract for a player who isn’t playing well.

30 minutes ago, EaglesIreland said:

Should wentz be worried ? I think he should be more worried today than he was yesterday. The rams have shown the way out of a bad contract for a player who isn’t playing well.

I think the big difference between Wentz and Goff is that Goff has always been somewhat average, whereas Wentz has fallen off a cliff. This also might be a wakeup call that Wentz needed to fix his issues instead of thinking everyone else is the problem.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.