Jump to content

Featured Replies

 I am looking at are Ferguson Wisconsin  underrated receiver and just a stud blocker at TE. Think him paired with Geodart could make a deadly duo 

  • Replies 89.6k
  • Views 2.3m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

3 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

 I am looking at are Ferguson Wisconsin  underrated receiver and just a stud blocker at TE. Think him paired with Geodart could make a deadly duo 

I like this type of pick.  What round are we looking at with this guy?

16 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I’m assuming Pitts is gone by 20/21 hence me going Bateman.... Think we end up drafting QB with our top 10 pick which is Zach Wilson...

Im starting to look at Surratt former QB that transition to LB so likely lots of room to grow probably a really good football IQ as well. 

I have no clue who we are trading with(if at all)

17 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I’m assuming Pitts is gone by 20/21 hence me going Bateman.... Think we end up drafting QB with our top 10 pick which is Zach Wilson...

Im starting to look at Surratt former QB that transition to LB so likely lots of room to grow probably a really good football IQ as well. 

yeah I just said Surratt lol

19 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I’m assuming Pitts is gone by 20/21 hence me going Bateman.... Think we end up drafting QB with our top 10 pick which is Zach Wilson...

Im starting to look at Surratt former QB that transition to LB so likely lots of room to grow probably a really good football IQ as well. 

Btw you know we COULD take Pitts,then maybe a Trask or Mac Jones later in 1 right???? Pitts and Trask already played together and we have a coach from FL.Kills 3 birds with 2 picks lol

Wanted Samuel in the 2nd if we didn't go there in the 1st, which I didn't expect.

I do wonder w/ the new coaching staff if the board is made up by positions and the quality of player at those positions vs the others. Then again we need so much there are very few positions we couldn't go BPA at this yr.

2 - 1st rd kickers would be rediculous, even for us!

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Btw you know we COULD take Pitts,then maybe a Trask or Mac Jones later in 1 right???? Pitts and Trask already played together and we have a coach from FL.Kills 3 birds with 2 picks lol

Possible sure... Not sure I see Howie/Lurie doing that though that is the real question but hey I’m always up to be surprised lol 

1 minute ago, mjkline1958 said:

Wanted Samuel in the 2nd if we didn't go there in the 1st, which I didn't expect.

I do wonder w/ the new coaching staff if the board is made up by positions and the quality of player at those positions vs the others. Then again we need so much there are very few positions we couldn't go BPA at this yr.

2 - 1st rd kickers would be rediculous, even for us!

I have Moehrig at S in 2. I had Samuels in another mock,so I like him too

20 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Sorry but Wentz....is the soap opera stuff

Ham, but look at the bright side here.  Lurie loves Andy.  Lurie loves Wentz.  Howie is still here.

The obvious thing is the last 2 seasons of both, the rosters were not good enough... dumpster fire stuff.   Questionable stuff going on behind the scenes 

Just saw an article " Andy Reid had to leave Philadelphia to be successful "

And you are smart enough to see into the future... " Wentz had to leave Philadelphia to be successful "

Right now you are just being the typical emotional Philly sports fan, the anger towards Wentz, in why he couldn't take 2 dumpster fire teams to the playoffs.   But you know the real issue lies within the organization and not putting the guys ( Reid, Wentz) in the best position to succeed.

Do you foresee Jeff Lurie watching a future AFC championship game where Reid is coaching and Wentz is playing.. and the light bulb finally goes off? 

4 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

have no clue who we are trading with(if at all)

Right now I’m just going with the popular rumors which has been Chicago and Indy lol picks 20 and 21... 

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Possible sure... Not sure I see Howie/Lurie doing that though that is the real question but hey I’m always up to be surprised lol 

IDK if we can't find a QB trading for Foles and taking Trask and having Hurts, we're in worse shape than I thought

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

IDK if we can't find a QB trading for Foles and taking Trask and having Hurts, we're in worse shape than I thought

Dumpster fire!

3 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Right now I’m just going with the popular rumors which has been Chicago and Indy lol picks 20 and 21... 

Yeah but see, in your scenario we take Wilson to SIT him because we traded for Foles? between FOles and Wilson who are you sitting? My scenario doesn't waste a first on a QB that will sit

2 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Dumpster fire!

Yes but you predicted FOLES RETURNS!!! HAHAHAHA

I'm fine taking Trask and letting him sit and get better behind Foles. I cannot sit my first pick QB at 6. It would be tough enough sitting a first round QB at 20 and BTW who is the guy we got from the Gators?

 

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Yeah but see, in your scenario we take Wilson to SIT him because we traded for Foles? between FOles and Wilson who are you sitting? My scenario doesn't waste a first on a QB that will sit

I think Foles is part of the trade mainly for Wentz. I think Foles will be the penciled in starter but will be open competition. But wouldn’t shock me to see a Wilson as the day 1 starter

Pick up Pitts and Trask,trade for Foles. Trade Ertz and Hurts for more picks

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I think Foles is part of the trade mainly for Wentz. I think Foles will be the penciled in starter but will be open competition. But wouldn’t shock me to see a Wilson as the day 1 starter

Then you're going to sit FOles? Why trade for him then?

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Pick up Pitts and Trask,trade for Foles. Trade Ertz and Hurts for more picks

Then you're going to sit FOles? Why trade for him then?

To appease Wentz to make the deal go through. 

Can't see being angry at injuries - they'll happen and we just have to accept them. Can be angry at Howie for his bad drafts, who he passed over in those drafts, bad contracts, bad FA's. Very angry at Jeff for allowing it to happen, and not just once.

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

To appease Wentz to make the deal go through. 

And after starting Foles wants to be a BU again? Sounds like more drama in the making(again)

No offense to Foles but not like he was lighting it up why he was the backup in Chicago lol. Came in as the backup played then got benched again.  Definitely it your franchise QB but a hell of a backup 

3 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

No offense to Foles but not like he was lighting it up why he was the backup in Chicago lol. Came in as the backup played then got benched again.  Definitely it your franchise QB but a hell of a backup 

IDK sounds "iffy" IMO Can't say it won't happen, just saying thats not a good look to trade so we can "dump Wentz off"

3 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

No offense to Foles but not like he was lighting it up why he was the backup in Chicago lol. Came in as the backup played then got benched again.  Definitely it your franchise QB but a hell of a backup 

he started there before(and in Jax)

12 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Dumpster fire!

 

Dumpster_Fire_c43-0-596-323_s885x516.jpg

Say what you want,but I have always like Fitz. he floats around from team to team,comes in and saves your arse then goes someplace else to repeat it lol(not saying I want him now cause he is "up there") but I respect the man

6 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

he started there before(and in Jax)

Lost his job in Jax after one year signed in Chicago to be the backup... Became the starter for a few weeks then got benched again for Trubisky... I mean dudes a backup a damn good one. 
 

See it as a win all around for Philly Wentz is traded. Gain multiple picks get a top tier backup in Foles and can draft our QB of the future. 

Foles thrived in our old O, we know what to do to make things work for him again. What I like about him and Hurts is they weren't looking for "their guy" like Wentz did too often. They understand the play, process the D, go through their reads and act more quickly than Wentz does. Wentz quite often winds up holding on to the ball waiting for the play to develop. Coaches could have helped by going to the quick pass game and not abandoning the running game too early. Expect Siri to have our QB's getting the ball out fast to all the playmakers and keeping a decent balance w/ the RB's in both the run and pass.

8 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Say what you want,but I have always like Fitz. he floats around from team to team,comes in and saves your arse then goes someplace else to repeat it lol(not saying I want him now cause he is "up there") but I respect the man

I like Fitz too and not concerned about age.  What you’re looking for is nothing more than a short term fallback plan should Hurts completely crap the bed (in which case you draft a QB high in 2022).  If Hurts flourishes then the backup doesn’t see the field (unless due to injury).  

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.