Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Didnt say cut him, I said I would keep Ward over Jjaw if it came to that decision. I hope we draft 2 that replace them BOTH

Lmao then what are you doing with JJaw your making zero sense.

Said I wanted to see trio of JJaw/Watkins/Hightower beat Ward for a starting job basically want one of the young guys to take the next step. Then your saying I would keep Ward????

If we draft guys hope they compete to and hope we find 5 good WRs(or 6) but that means other guys getting cut 

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LOL nope,but this is why we strive for .500. Say we "did the right thing" and got JJ last year, Pitts this year. While 1 player may not make a difference over the course of a few years ALL those guys make the difference

Right... time to let it go bro...  he is a Viking,  we can't get that pick back.  And to be honest,  idk his impact last year with this team.   The OL was brutal and he wouldn't have had a running game or Theilen to take attention away.    

This defense could easily go in the toilet ... like really really bad soon, if we don't get some young players in here.  Graham and Cox are not going to be here forever,  without them, we are in trouble!

5 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

This was an easy trade to make. 

Yep hand Pitts to Dullaz on a platter lol. perfect

4 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Right... time to let it go bro...  he is a Viking,  we can't get that pick back.  And to be honest,  idk his impact last year with this team.   The OL was brutal and he wouldn't have had a running game or Theilen to take attention away.    

This defense could easily go in the toilet ... like really really bad soon, if we don't get some young players in here.  Graham and Cox are not going to be here forever,  without them, we are in trouble!

My new mock has 3 D players in a row lol then a CENTER to replace Kelce with the 2nd- 3rd pick(Josh Myers),then I go O with  WR,and RB, after that grad your WIP linemen

4 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Yeah,that fact we "wanted" to move up for Wilson,already tells me Hurts is only a fill in.Sadly we gave up JJ last year and it appears we will give up Pitts THIS year,and if he doesn't go to ATL,he will go to Dullaz,because they aren't stupid. Assuming Wentz does well in Indy we'd have 2 firsts which is more than enough to move to get your QB, but greedy Howie doesn't see it that way. having 3 firsts next year is great, but you just gave up a player who will impact the game for a decade, was it worth it? Personally, I dont think so. If ATL passes on Pitts,I could see us moving back up a bit,maybe like Joe said to 7,but I dont see any way he gets past Dullaz

Pitts should go 1st.  He is the best college prospect of all time.   

No pressure there,  it's exactly why I didn't want to see him here.  He doesn't need this crap from our fans.  If he falls at 12 then great,  and I have no doubts he will be a good player.  But no worth 2 firsts and a move up in another round.  He doesn't need that ridiculous amount of pressure in a sport where 53 guys make up a roster. 

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Yep hand Pitts to Dullaz on a platter lol. perfect

Dude... this is where I don't get you.   Pitts is a generational talent.  But he is going to fall all the way to 10 now?   Which is it? Last week we were handing him to Detroit...now it's 3 picks later.

I think we will see the first time in NFL history...where 1 player can get drafted and play for multiple teams.  Pitts will be playing for ATL, Detroit, Dallas and the Giants next year.   All 4 of them.  

3 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Dude... this is where I don't get you.   Pitts is a generational talent.  But he is going to fall all the way to 10 now?   Which is it? Last week we were handing him to Detroit...now it's 3 picks later.

IDK,but if he does Dullaz wont be passing on him

A thread listing 40 times, measurements for the top corners.

Jim Nagy on Twitter: "Good year to need big, long, fast, & explosive CBs (Potential Day 1). ⏱💥 Jaycee Horn 6006, 33 arm, 4.37/4.39, 41,5 VJ Greg Newsome 6000, 31 1/8 arm, 4.37/4.40, 40 VJ Patrick Surtain II 6020, 32 1/2 arm, 4.40/4.44, 39 VJ Ifeatu Melifonwu 6024, 32 1/4 arm, 4.48/4.49, 41.5 VJ" / Twitter

Jim Nagy on Twitter: "Good year to need big, long, fast, & explosive CBs(Potential Day 2). ⏱💥 Eric Stokes 6005, 32 3/4 arm, 4.25/4.29, 38.5 VJ Robert Rochell 5116, 32 1/2 arm, 4.39/4.45, 43.0 VJ Tyson Campbell 6010, 32 arm, 4.39/4.44, 34.5 VJ Ambry Thomas 5117, 32 1/4 arm, 4.37/4.39, 38 VJ" / Twitter

Farley not on the list because he didn't run at his pro day.

I imagine one name from these two lists will be an Eagle, and likely our CB2.

3 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

I think we will see the first time in NFL history...where 1 player can get drafted and play for multiple teams.  Pitts will be playing for ATL, Detroit, Dallas and the Giants next year.   All 4 of them.  

One will get him because ALL four pick ahead of us lol

1 minute ago, jsb235 said:

A thread listing 40 times, measurements for the top corners.

Jim Nagy on Twitter: "Good year to need big, long, fast, & explosive CBs (Potential Day 1). ⏱💥 Jaycee Horn 6006, 33 arm, 4.37/4.39, 41,5 VJ Greg Newsome 6000, 31 1/8 arm, 4.37/4.40, 40 VJ Patrick Surtain II 6020, 32 1/2 arm, 4.40/4.44, 39 VJ Ifeatu Melifonwu 6024, 32 1/4 arm, 4.48/4.49, 41.5 VJ" / Twitter

Jim Nagy on Twitter: "Good year to need big, long, fast, & explosive CBs(Potential Day 2). ⏱💥 Eric Stokes 6005, 32 3/4 arm, 4.25/4.29, 38.5 VJ Robert Rochell 5116, 32 1/2 arm, 4.39/4.45, 43.0 VJ Tyson Campbell 6010, 32 arm, 4.39/4.44, 34.5 VJ Ambry Thomas 5117, 32 1/4 arm, 4.37/4.39, 38 VJ" / Twitter

Farley not on the list because he didn't run at his pro day.

I imagine one name from these two lists will be an Eagle, and likely our CB2.

Yeah I like newsome and Horn

8 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Pitts is a generational talent

But he's not a QB lol SF moved up obviously for a QB which dropped Pitts down a spot. he could go to Miami at 6,the point is we took him off our board(voluntarily). So cross off one generational talent

I didn’t have us going Pitts even if we stayed at 6 honestly so moving back is fine 

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I didn’t have us going Pitts even if we stayed at 6 honestly so moving back is fine 

Welp we're not going QB at 12 either, so new mocks all around lol

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Welp we're not going QB at 12 either, so new mocks all around lol

I already stated that lmao but hey thanks buddy 

4 hours ago, time2rock said:

The rumor that we wanted to move up to 3 to get Wilson (I wouldn't call it fact because, well you know ... the media) tells me that if true, the earlier "reports" that Lurie instructed Howie to do whatever possible to build around Hurts was false.  So a true rumor to squash a false one, or a false one that contradicts an earlier possibly true one.  It's anyone's guess.  It's the silly season ... a lot of inaccurate info is purposely put out there by the teams so I try not to put much faith in them as being true.  

It seems most were on either Chase or Pitts (and quite a few also on Smith and Waddle).  It wouldn't surprise me in the least if 2 or 3 of those 4 are still there at 12.  If we still end up landing either Chase or Pitts (my 2 preferred targets) after trading back imagine how the perception of Howie will change (well at least temporarily).  lol

Right .. so if you think a couple of these guys are there anyway,  why would you pick at 6?   

Unless you think that only one player makes the impact and not only would he be there at 6, but the Eagles would take him? 

35 minutes ago, mjkline1958 said:

Also don't understand the complaints about Ward, he comes through.

I like Ward he is fine love to see him around as the 4th 5th guy but he can and should be upgraded on... Id love for that to be one of our young guys on roster taking the next step 

6 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I already stated that lmao but hey thanks buddy 

LMAO,I think that was pretty much assumed but CONGRATS for saying it FIRST! U RULE!!

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LMAO,I think that was pretty much assumed but CONGRATS for saying it FIRST! U RULE!!

I know thank but hey your the one who had to repeat aren’t you great also lmao 

5 hours ago, time2rock said:

So what happens if after seeing Hurts all of 2021 they decide he isn't the guy and go grab their QB next year that fits the description of a true passing type QB?  Then similar to your DL/LB situation, you would have passed on a generational type skill position player for what would likely be a lesser player at another position.  

I don’t think you take a QB for the sake of taking a QB.... You don’t settle for the other guy either....you either get your guy or move on and build the roster. At least that is my mind set on drafting QBs. 

3 hours ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I mean in terms of similar yes meant the physical and the fact both guys are not the most traditional inline TE neither are plus blockers(yet) and there biggest skill is what they can do after the catch.

But the fact they have a TE they like and major holes everywhere else makes me think it’s hard for them to take Pitts even if on the board. I’d think Dallas is more likely to take Pitts before NY... But honestly not sure either would take him other really good players in areas they need help in. 

Agreed on the other needs... but Pitts strength is not after he gets the ball... his strength is getting the ball.  For a QB, that's a big difference.   The Giants were the division Champs if Engram catches that pillow Jones laid out for him the first game vs the Eagles.   He also caused a few INTs with drops last year.   But you can hand the ball off to Engram,  don't see that with Pitts. 

Just now, joemas6 said:

but Pitts strength is not after he gets the ball... his strength is getting the ball.

Soooo he doesn’t have YAC ability Joe come on buddy your better then this yes he can catch the ball lots of guys can catch the ball well but what excites people about Pitts is the ability once the ball is in his hands 

Travis Kielce, Gronk, Kittle all great at catching the ball what makes them special what they can do once they catch the ball.... Ertz great at catching not much after why he was never in the same tier 

To add Gronk and Kittle were are both plus blockers... Not as sure with Kielce sure he is fine at blocking as well though 

27 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Agreed on the other needs... but Pitts strength is not after he gets the ball... his strength is getting the ball.  For a QB, that's a big difference.   The Giants were the division Champs if Engram catches that pillow Jones laid out for him the first game vs the Eagles.   He also caused a few INTs with drops last year.   But you can hand the ball off to Engram,  don't see that with Pitts. 

SO he gets open and gets the ball,like that's a bad thing lol( supposedly why we got Jjaw lol)

31 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I know thank but hey your the one who had to repeat aren’t you great also lmao 

SO no need to comment on my post, just move on like an adult would(it's hard for you I know lol) But nope,we had to point out "I said if first" lmao. Participation trophy will be mailed to you Monday