My first 7 are D,O,D,O,D,D,O

I'm serious about getting Kelce's replacement in here(and I dont care who is on the roster), so if I have the chance I will take Myers at C and nail that piece down

No surprise, officially 17 games.

Now how is that game decided home or away?

I'm fine at 37 with any WR near there. They are all talented enough to play, just different skill sets, but I think we need a top one despite the fact the class is deep, we need one to free up Reagor and he can't be "mediocre" or a WIP. We need him on the field learning, not sitting behind the lackluster guys we have now(they are fine as BU's)

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Why I would like to see a nice balance between O and D. We have an all new staff. I dont want to bomb one or the other.if we went all D he would have to put up a GREAT unit,so lets spread the job assignments around. Once we do that,then it's easier to see where the holes are next year

I’m in the let’s figure out what we already have at WR again 4 guys going into year two I like all 4 guys and would like to see more of them. I’d rather see us focus on defense and find some compliment pieces for the O later ie bigger RB maybe a blocking TE 

2 minutes ago, mjkline1958 said:

No surprise, officially 17 games.

Now how is that game decided home or away?

IDK maybe one is in a UK per team?? good question though

OK, AFC gets home this yr, NFC next

Still hate the oversees games

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I’m in the let’s figure out what we already have at WR again 4 guys going into year two I like all 4 guys and would like to see more of them. I’d rather see us focus on defense and find some compliment pieces for the O later ie bigger RB maybe a blocking TE 

I have those in my mock lol. We got 2 S's already so we are addressing the D, but without O weapons, no QB is going anywhere here. Our D is not terrible,our O IS. Add a CB at 12 and a LB and we aren't in too bad of shape. The later picks can be used for youth injection on either side

Phase 1 ( whatever that means ) OTA's April 19, not necessarily in person. Had my 2nd shot today, don't know why they can't get it yet

2 minutes ago, mjkline1958 said:

OK, AFC gets home this yr, NFC next

Still hate the oversees games

Seems DUMB lol. I would opt for the international games(we're going to play them anyway) as the 17th game "neutral" field. Seems more fair to me

1 minute ago, mjkline1958 said:

Phase 1 ( whatever that means ) OTA's April 19, not necessarily in person. Had my 2nd shot today, don't know why they can't get it yet

Age lol.They can have mine

8 minutes ago, mjkline1958 said:

No surprise, officially 17 games.

Now how is that game decided home or away?

Not a fan of the 17 games just going to look ugly just a money grab for the nfl 

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Not a fan of the 17 games just going to look ugly just a money grab for the nfl 

I can understand it though. Barring a TIE, a team will either have a winning or losing record. No more 8-8 you are either 9-8 or 8-9

What I REALLY want is to go back to the old KO rules. I miss the excitement of runs backs and they took those away for the most part

11 minutes ago, mjkline1958 said:

OK, AFC gets home this yr, NFC next

Still hate the oversees games

Thanks for that info

41 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Bateman all day great route runner already good hands size... Think he is the most underrated guy in this draft at WR doesn’t get lot of hype 

Lol just goes to show the depth of this WR class Marshall, Williams, Bateman and others all could be had later 

He's a master at WR

5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I can understand it though. Barring a TIE, a team will either have a winning or losing record. No more 8-8 you are either 9-8 or 8-9

 Did it really matter lol if you are 9-8 or 8-9 or 8-8 I would look at the teams the same a middOr of the road squad 

Just now, matchew88 said:

He's a master at WR

I do think Bateman is one of the more nfl ready guys I’d expect him to make a bigger impact early on then some other that maybe have more "upside” so they say lol 

A master Bateman - not going there!

Well, At least We can basically agree on what positions they should address with the first 4 picks:

Either WR, CB, LB, Edge or DT ... Get 4 of these and hit on each one. Then we should be in good shape. Possibly a O-Guard Center....

As lifelong fans, we've seen the ebbs and flows. They'll gain an extra week of prep before the 1st game. Would much rather have camps start earlier/be longer. Drop another PS game?

1 minute ago, mjkline1958 said:

Would much rather have camps start earlier/be longer. Drop another PS game?

This is a toughie though PS games mean nothing to fans I do think they earn players jobs give them games to show what they can do. Camp not everyone is a great practice guy we have seen plenty of great practice guys flop in games and vise-versa. 
 

I think 3 PS games is the right amount gives two games to seriously look at the mid/bottom roster and the rehearsal game for the starters work out some of the kinks before regular season. 

30 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Looking at likely two firsts and 2nd give or take similar to what we gave up when we traded for Wentz 

One 1st being our own 2021 1st and the other being either the one from Miami or the one from Indy (assuming Wentz meets the criteria to get their 1st - I think it is a pretty safe bet).  Then we still have the other 1st to grab some early talent (and a QB not chewing up 15% of the cap).  

2 minutes ago, time2rock said:

One 1st being our own 2021 1st and the other being either the one from Miami or the one from Indy (assuming Wentz meets the criteria to get their 1st - I think it is a pretty safe bet).  Then we still have the other 1st to grab some early talent (and a QB not chewing up 15% of the cap).  

It would also depend where we are picking and where Miami and the Colts are picking as wel lots of unknown variables. But cap wise definitely cheaper also gambling on a bigger unknown vs a proven guy like Wilson/Watson. 
 

Something to worry about next though when we know what the QB class looks like where our picks are and what Hurts is 

4 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

This is a toughie though PS games mean nothing to fans I do think they earn players jobs give them games to show what they can do. Camp not everyone is a great practice guy we have seen plenty of great practice guys flop in games and vise-versa. 
 

I think 3 PS games is the right amount gives two games to seriously look at the mid/bottom roster and the rehearsal game for the starters work out some of the kinks before regular season. 

BG, I think we are going to see allot more inter squad practices starting this year. That will help offset the dropping of one PS game and still be able to get a feel of the talent...

Just now, stine said:

BG, I think we are going to see allot more inter squad practices starting this year. That will help offset the dropping of one PS game and still be able to get a feel of the talent...

Was thinking that practicing with other teams could offset it some really I’m fine dropping game 4 of preseason was useless mainly anyway... Thought 3 is the right number