If Waddle is at 12, I take him. I can spend the next 2 on CB's back to back if I wanted to or like I said go  WR,CB,LB,CB. I would take a CB if Waddle is gone. Sorry guys if Reagor is the only "threat" WR we have,we aren't going anywhere. Time to clear out the dead wood on this team. 

WIth Ertz supposedly gone, dreftnetwork makes us, dullass, Atlanta, LA and Houston all pretty TE needy. Possible trade partners?

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/R/ReagJa00.htm    This is pathetic right here. The last #1 WR Agholor wasn't much better. Wanna try again???? A)We are clueless on WR's to draft and how they fit in our OWN system B) My round 1 pick needs to do alot better than this(or why did I waste the pick on him) C) If your #1 WR pick can't produce by year 2, the entire WR staff needs to be fired. Now I'm not expecting a rook to get 1200 yards(even though others do), but JFC they better by year 2 at least show they are on the upswing. This is annoying and frustrating when you can't get the ball to your playmakers

2 minutes ago, mjkline1958 said:

WIth Ertz supposedly gone, dreftnetwork makes us, dullass, Atlanta, LA and Houston all pretty TE needy. Possible trade partners?

ATL will/should take Pitts

4 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

ATL will/should take Pitts

Yep, supposedly farming Julio Jones too

12th Ertz and a 3rd for the Panthers 8th pick wouldn’t shock me 

This WR fiasco(and make no mistake it's a fiasco) forces us to always hit FA because we fail to develop the ones we draft. So maybe y'all are right,just give up on that position and pick off more FA's(cause thats what we DO). If thats the case,no need for a WR at all this draft,since it's a pointless effort in futility

6 minutes ago, mjkline1958 said:

Yep, supposedly farming Julio Jones too

IDK why, gaining Pitts would actually give them some semblance of respect to contend in that division, offensively at least

I am hearing more and more that the Gnats like Smith

Just saying if we get back into the top 10.

Still have picks in every round plus gained an extra 1st in next years draft... Howie did a fantastic job maneuvering trades in the draft.

He probably will just F up the picks though so will be all for nothing lol 

Here is my issue in a nutshell. OK we lost Wentz (because we failed to give him a team),so now rinse and repeat with Hurts. Same old BS. Don't care if it's Hurts or a new QB next year,if you don't give them weapons they will fail. get some weapons in here,not for this year,but so they can grow and learn. Without them Hurts is guaranteed to be gone next year and we'll bring in the next "god he will save us from lack of planning" QB.With no WR's, do you think this team would appeal to say Wilson or any other decent FA QB? I will stick out my neck and say NOPE. If it doesn't appeal to a FA QB,what are your chances with a rook??

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Just saying if we get back into the top 10.

Still have picks in every round plus gained an extra 1st in next years draft... Howie did a fantastic job maneuvering trades in the draft.

He probably will just F up the picks though so will be all for nothing lol 

IDK in my view last years pick was a ":shoe in". I sat in STUNNED silence when they took Reagor. I threw ALL of my foam pillows at the TV right after I pulled out my last hair

If we have no weapons, then I will say we play Flacco. At least he will go through his checkdowns before being sacked

On other news SF going Mac Jones is cooling off now Trey Lance is starting to get hype at 3. 
 

Lance would be a good fit there Shanny get maximum him plus they could let him sit for awhile behind Jimmy G if needed 

43 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

"statistically" it depends where all those guys went. Cooper would have sucked here last year,so would any of the top WR's. A round 5 WR would look great in Tampa simply because there is a TEAM around him

King's analysis took into account ALL WRs drafted since 2016.  

6 minutes ago, time2rock said:

King's analysis took into account ALL WRs drafted since 2016.  

What about all CB's since 2016?

Easy, we can get all defense if you want and hope we win those 3-0 games because thats all we will score

Opposing defenses- "just DT Reagor,clog up the middle and they are done"

26 minutes ago, mjkline1958 said:

Yep, supposedly farming Julio Jones too

ertz for jones done deal

Some saying Fields is dropping - what happens then? Before negating that, think of all 3 1st rd picks next yr not having to be spent on a QB. Just a possible scenario of QB competition.

58 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Reagor, that is ONE WR out of 3 needed.ONE. I suppose that is terrific for a supposed ONE read QB since he only needs ONE. Depends for me, if Waddle is there, I am taking him. You'd be foolish not to. BTW I cannot compare us to GB as far as developing WR's WORLDS apart. Maybe we close the gap a bit with this new staff, but we won;t know that either unless we get some top tier talent in here

I get it. You want Waddle. I am defensive minded for round 1. Just my preference...

Too much baggage w/ Julio, at least there was, dunno what he's like now. He's also 32

2 minutes ago, mjkline1958 said:

Some saying Fields is dropping - what happens then? Before negating that, think of all 3 1st rd picks next yr not having to be spent on a QB. Just a possible scenario of QB competition.

 I heard that Fields is equal to Hurts. Not sure I want that if this is the case....

3 minutes ago, stine said:

I get it. You want Waddle. I am defensive minded for round 1. Just my preference...

Well it was a swing and a miss last year. How many times will we fan at this position? If he is there I take him, if not, CB and a WR at 37(actually I want Pitts HAHAHA)

2 minutes ago, mjkline1958 said:

Some saying Fields is dropping - what happens then? Before negating that, think of all 3 1st rd picks next yr not having to be spent on a QB. Just a possible scenario of QB competition.

Stated in my guesses if we end up moving back up will be for a QB. Not saying I agree with it but just seems like the most likely reason for a move back up. 
 

Otherwise we could likely get a Waddle/Smith/Horn/Surtain etc. at 12 

If Atl takes a QB,the entire draft will go insane

9 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

What about all CB's since 2016?

I don't know I didn't do the analysis and don't have plans to.