Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

we have 37 and 70 thats 2 picks

I miss read lmao thought you said we are down 2 pick missed the to in there 

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

idk about whiff... but just seems like both Dallas and NY made out much better.  Dallas got the guy they were going to take at 10 plus our 3rd rounder... NY got better assets than we did from the Miami trade.   And I think Smith would have been there at 12 because the Giants are good at WR and have other positions they could use.   

well thats a whiff to me. Especially when this is a super DEEP WR draft

Mac to the Pats 

4 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

well thats a whiff to me. Especially when this is a super DEEP WR draft

If there was a HUGE fall off,then NP,but this draft is loaded at WR and we gave up a round 3 we didnt need to IMO. I found WR's we could use into round FOUR. With all we need I just thought it was unnecessary(aka whiff)

Smith is a huge addition to this team. Offense looks young and inexperienced....but good. 

5 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I miss read lmao thought you said we are down 2 pick missed the to in there 

All good

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Smith is a huge addition to this team. Offense looks young and inexperienced....but good. 

we could have added a young inexperienced GOOD WR at 84 lol

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

If there was a HUGE fall off,then NP,but this draft is loaded at WR and we gave up a round 3 we didnt need to IMO. I found WR's we could use into round FOUR. With all we need I just thought it was unnecessary(aka whiff)

What we could use in round four? Or Hurts old teammate that has total confidence in him that just won the Heisman?

Reggie Wayne already calling Smith OROY. I don’t think we have the QB to make him rookie of the year. But hey was wrong on us trading up for a WR maybe Hurts proves me wrong also 

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

All good

we could have added a young inexperienced GOOD WR at 84 lol

Or we added a day one starter at the X opposite Reagor.

6 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Mac to the Pats 

Good pick for the Pats

 

Smith was my initial round 1 pick WAY back on my first mock lol. But as I went through them all,I felt waiting would have been a better option since I found alot of others we could have taken later. But it is what it is. Now the next 2 tomorrow become more crucial

Made Fulgham the backup at X. Good spot for him to be in potentially also.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Smith is a huge addition to this team. Offense looks young and inexperienced....but good. 

Smith, Watkins and Reagor on the field at the same time is such a scary thought. 

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

What we could use in round four? Or Hurts old teammate that has total confidence in him that just won the Heisman?

If that was our only hole NP. We lost a chance to fill another hole by giving up the 84 pick

Just now, jsb235 said:

Smith, Watkins and Reagor on the field at the same time is such a scary thought. 

Let’s not forget Sanders. Leaves plenty of room for Goedert to work in between.

I’m just curious if we are finished tonight. Can’t rule out a move back into round 1 

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

What we could use in round four? Or Hurts old teammate that has total confidence in him that just won the Heisman?

Ham///

1.  Do you think Dallas took our offer over the Bears offer?

2.  If not... then do you think the giants would have passed on the Bears offer for Smith?

You see where I'm going?   Smith  should have been there for us at 12.  

 

 

I’d image if we got back up in round 1 it involves Ertz 

Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I’m just curious if we are finished tonight. Can’t rule out a move back into round 1 

We need a corner in the worst way. We don't want any more to come off the board.

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Made Fulgham the backup at X. Good spot for him to be in potentially also.

Why not Fulgham/Smith out and Reagor in the slot?(Ward as BU)

Just now, joemas6 said:

Ham///

1.  Do you think Dallas took our offer over the Bears offer?

2.  If not... then do you think the giants would have passed on the Bears offer for Smith?

You see where I'm going?   Smith  should have been there for us at 12.  

 

 

Here is my question if the bears were willing to trade to 11 why not 10 or 12???? Did the bears not calling Philly about 12??? 

Think the circumstances changed as soon as Philly moved up so I agree with the trade up no but not sure Smith makes it to 12 either 

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I’d image if we got back up in round 1 it involves Ertz 

Maybe Buff would go 3rd for Ertz??? That would help us(and them)

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

If that was our only hole NP. We lost a chance to fill another hole by giving up the 84 pick

You need to look at everything. We moved back, traded Wentz and added a third,fourth and two firsts next year(many here think). Giving up a third to get Smith. We added plenty of draft ammo and still hit DeVonte Smith. I wouldn’t even look at it like we gave up anything.

1 minute ago, jsb235 said:

We need a corner in the worst way. We don't want any more to come off the board.

CB isn’t that huge of a concern for me based off everything we supposedly will do on D we can get a Cb in the 3rd that could start 

3 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Ham///

1.  Do you think Dallas took our offer over the Bears offer?

2.  If not... then do you think the giants would have passed on the Bears offer for Smith?

You see where I'm going?   Smith  should have been there for us at 12.  

 

 

We added draft ammo and still got DeVonte Smith